On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 06:32 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Are you planning to pursue 2.10 as RM or
should we be moving on to 2.11? The only outstanding issue I am aware
of is pgollucci's claim that the perl modules aren't linking correctly
to libapreq2 on Solaris. While that would be nice to
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:09:23 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r733221 - in
Dead projects typically have a bus-factor of 1,
where committers have all gotten into the habit
of waiting for one another to come along for the
ride. It's true that somebody has to drive the
bus, but the driver should rotate (and is named
RM). The only person allowed to set a schedule
for a
