Hi Simon
Very good point -- I also think this falls into the scope
of draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines aligned with my interpretation of your
words. I believe Section 8.2.2 of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-08 somewhat
implicitly covers that.
Cheers,
Naeem
On Tue, Oct
Hi all
Any comments on the newly submitted update as
draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01 is welcomed. In the new version, we have
tried to address the issues brought up on the ML as well as the feedback we
received at the IETF-91 and have tried to incorporate them all. We have
also clarified
Hi Richard
line 134: ???: does an AQM implementation must justify its cost. I don't
think you
that's *probably* me trying to say that it's up to the AQM designers to
justify the cost of their proposed AQM given a set of
scenarios/environments where their AQM is aimed to operate at. Q1: Is it
I'm interested in contributing to the evaluation guidelines draft as writer
as expressed before, although I won't be able to actively work on this
earlier than the second week of Feb'14.
Regards,
Naeem
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Wesley Eddy w...@mti-systems.com wrote:
Hi, as we've
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Anoop Ghanwani an...@alumni.duke.eduwrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Curtis Villamizar
cur...@ipv6.occnc.comwrote:
Including unrealistic scenarios, like going from near zero traffic to 10
interfaces feeding one at full speed until overflow
Very sorry for double-posting as for some reasons what I was answering to
was missed from the rest of my previous email. So here again:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Preethi Natarajan preethi@gmail.comwrote:
From: Naeem Khademi naeem.khad...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, November 14
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Preethi Natarajan preethi@gmail.comwrote:
Please see inline…
From: Naeem Khademi naeem.khad...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:01 AM
To: Preethi Natarajan preethi@gmail.com
Cc: Michael Welzl mich...@ifi.uio.no, aqm@ietf.org aqm
