On 10/18/16 2:18 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Jana Iyengar writes:
>
>> We'll send out a revised draft early next week.
>
> Soo... Ping?
Being the co-author of an important RFC has always been on my bucket
list, which actually doesn't have a whole lot left on it.
Ping?
__
Jana Iyengar writes:
> We'll send out a revised draft early next week.
Soo... Ping?
-Toke
___
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
Hi Jana,
Am 29.09.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Jana Iyengar:
> There are two issues in that email:
> 1. The importance of reentering state. This is clearly a matter for
> evaluation, and further evaluation will surely yield more results. We
> cannot and won't be perfect in this draft, but I encourage fur
That sounds good to me.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
> In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9
> (or other suitable place). Since we want to encourage wide
> experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about what some of the
> open q
In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9
(or other suitable place). Since we want to encourage wide
experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about what some of the
open questions/topics are.
On 9/29/2016 12:29 PM, Jana Iyengar wrote:
Hi Wes, Roland,
Hi Wes, Roland,
There are two issues in that email:
1. The importance of reentering state. This is clearly a matter for
evaluation, and further evaluation will surely yield more results. We
cannot and won't be perfect in this draft, but I encourage further
evaluation and work that can perhaps even
Hi Wes and all,
Am 14.09.2016 um 15:26 schrieb Wesley Eddy:
> Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
> comments were received, and the authors made an update some time ago.
> There hasn't been much follow-up discussion. I assume this means the
> current draft meets
Dave Täht writes:
> On 9/14/16 6:26 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
>> Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
>> comments were received, and the authors made an update some time ago.
>> There hasn't been much follow-up discussion. I assume this means the
>> current draft me
On 9/14/16 6:26 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
> Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
> comments were received, and the authors made an update some time ago.
> There hasn't been much follow-up discussion. I assume this means the
> current draft meets people's expectation
The idnits issues link should have been:
https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-aqm-codel-04.txt
Apologies for the copy-paste error.
On 9/14/2016 9:26 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
comments were rece
10 matches
Mail list logo
