* Peter Naulls (pe...@chocky.org) wrote:
>
> The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time. The last post to the
> ArcEm mailing list is more recent, but still over a year ago. In any
> case, Arculator (http://b-em.bbcmicro.com/arculator/) is probably
> a superior emulator. However, what I
Hi Chris,
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:26:31 -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
> > What I'll likely do then is close down the Sourceforge page. I'll
> > import the ArcEm CVS into riscos.info SVN for historic value (if
> > anyone really wants write access, just let me know a user
> > name/password). It's p
Hi Peter,
> > > The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time.
> >
> > Last change 2009-09-25?
>
> Sorry yes. "cvs log" does things in a unhelpful order. I've been
> using SVN too long.
Yes, I found it annoying when I went to look.
$ cvs log |
> sed '/^date: /!d; s#/.. .*##; s/.
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:26:31 -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
> What I'll likely do then is close down the Sourceforge page. I'll
> import the ArcEm CVS into riscos.info SVN for historic value
> (if anyone really wants write access, just let me know a user
> name/password). It's possible I might make
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time.
>
> Last change 2009-09-25?
Sorry yes. "cvs log" does things in a unhelpful order. I've been
using SVN too long. Do you have any specific plans for ArcEm here?
My biggest frustration with RPCEmu is stil
> You destroyed RPCemu - don't now destroy ArcEm.
I'm intrigued now - how did Peter destroy RPCemu? I thought it was more a
combination of me quitting and the Howkins spinning off the Spoon edition that
killed development in the SVN branch.
Tom
---
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:32:53AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
> If the consensus is an insistence is that it remains at SF, then
> that'll be done. Still, it needs some kind of conclusion, unless
> there really is on going development.
I too believe that Arcem should remain on SourceForge. Whils
Peter,
> I still don't know if we should be linking to your page or not.
> I have to assume the port has been lost (i.e, my overall fear
> here) and that the link should be removed. This alone would
> justify my concern.
The code is checked in to SF like all the other ports. Why you
should even
Peter,
You said:
> If I
> was so obviously cast in the mold for which are you
> insisting for me, then I would have just moved it, no
> questions asked.
Should you do so, and I'm fairly sure you will, I will simply
open up a new SF project to put the source back in the public
domain where it bel
Ian Jeffray wrote:
> Peter,
>
> You said:
> > If I
>> was so obviously cast in the mold for which are you
>> insisting for me, then I would have just moved it, no
>> questions asked.
>
> Should you do so, and I'm fairly sure you will,
It's your prerogative to believe this, but whether I do or n
Ian Jeffray wrote:
> Peter,
>
>> Please don't top-post.
>
> Understand common business practice and avoid the pettyness.
This is a serious development discussion. Proper inline posting
means the points can actually be replied to. Unfortunately
your response seems to be full of insults towards
Peter,
> Please don't top-post.
Understand common business practice and avoid the pettyness.
>> I do not think it is acceptable for you to close down an opensource
>> project and take it on to your private subversion server.
>
> riscos.info is not "private", any more than any other well-known
>
Peter,
I do not think it is acceptable for you to close down an opensource
project and take it on to your private subversion server. As a
contributor, supporter and user of this project, I do not support
this move.
Ultimately I can see you do whatever you wish to any project anyway.
Ian.
Pet
Hi Theo,
> The only likely problem is if SF cancels the project for being
> dormant.
Anyone have a link to their procedure in that case?
> They threatened to do that to a project I did, last update 2003, but
> the website is still there (I didn't use their CVS). It requires
> someone being ale
Ian Jeffray wrote:
> Peter,
Please don't top-post.
>
> I do not think it is acceptable for you to close down an opensource
> project and take it on to your private subversion server.
riscos.info is not "private", any more than any other well-known
RISC OS site is.
As a
> contributor, suppor
Hi Peter,
> The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time.
Last change 2009-09-25?
> The last post to the ArcEm mailing list is more recent, but still over
> a year ago. In any case, Arculator
> (http://b-em.bbcmicro.com/arculator/) is probably a superior emulator.
> However, what I don't
The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time. The last post to the
ArcEm mailing list is more recent, but still over a year ago. In any
case, Arculator (http://b-em.bbcmicro.com/arculator/) is probably
a superior emulator. However, what I don't want to happen is
for it to be lost/forgotte
17 matches
Mail list logo
