configurable. Perhaps
as a "minimum size" option? Anything smaller than that gets (integer)
scaled to get as close as possible?
"Full screen" would be best, but I've found emulators and Compiz don't
seem to like not FUBARing my desktop after finishing with them.
Chee
On 27 July 2012 20:41, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
>> Is there something I've missed which'd allow video scaling (say 2x)
>> for modes < 640x480.
>
> For the X11 port, the place to start looking is the
> SDD_Name(Host_C
On 29 July 2012 20:09, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
> What happens to 'HD' after its been initialised? What actually does
> the pixel blatting and how could this be getting confused with a >2
> XScale, but not a >2 YScale?
Ah, it seems that SDD_Name(RowFunc) dispatches to
On 29 July 2012 20:18, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
> Ah, it seems that SDD_Name(RowFunc) dispatches to an explicit set of
> functions which only support 1X and 2X. Hmm.
These 16 functions (1bpp, 2bpp, 4bpp, 8bpp @ 1x. 2x with flags and
without flags) are all *very* similar and look like they
On 29 July 2012 20:31, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
>> Ah, it seems that SDD_Name(RowFunc) dispatches to an explicit set of
>> functions which only support 1X and 2X. Hmm.
>
> Yes, I guess I forgot about that!
:-)
> Are you planni
n the Iyonix (i.e. RISC OS port) is it?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's se
On 29 July 2012 20:50, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> On 29/07/2012 20:34, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>>
>> 320x256 is common for games, but blowing these up by 3x to 960x768
>> seems sensible (on my setup at least). Adding another set for 3x would
>> be the easiest option, but a
On 29 July 2012 20:58, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
> Anything that could conceivably make things slower is a concern ;)
Fair enough. My day job makes me think that anything that makes such a
dent on maintainability is also a concern - but I do
On 27 July 2012 20:41, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
>> Is there something I've missed which'd allow video scaling (say 2x)
>> for modes < 640x480.
>
> For the X11 port, the place to start looking is the
> SDD_Name(Host_C
