Re: Trying to read a raw image file

2006-07-17 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Charles, I'd have thought you'd have had some Hugo outside that BASIC program though. What if you change *both* Hugos in the pipeline to `Nick'? Do you know what format the hard disc was? E? F? And was there more than one partition on it, as was required when bigger hard drives

Re: Trying to read a raw image file

2006-07-22 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Charles, I had to hack around with the acorn-fdisk source a little, but I managed to get it compiled in the end. It reports the following: Disk ../IMAGE.000: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 1024 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes Device Boot BeginStart End

Re: Problems with the Ctrl key (Linux) See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to https://sf.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=1atid=200001 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_MINUS BODY: Text

2006-08-14 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Tim, If I use the Ctrl key at all, it seems that it does the software equivalent of getting stuck - ie Ctrl-lock. You'll get more replies on the https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel mailing list as that's where most people that work on the source hang out. Can I

Re: can't acces floppy .adf images

2006-08-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Dmitry, I am using the cvs versoin, compiled on 2.6.16 linux and whenever I try to access a floppy, I have a message box Disc error 09 at :4/0C00 and a lot of messges on the terminal: OK, the `:4' means drive 4 and RISC OS treats drives 0 to 3 as floppies, and 4 to 7 as hard drives.

Re: RISC OS 2.00

2007-03-22 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi grim, I have RISC OS 2 ROMs which have always worked fine for me on Archie; but they don't seem to work too well with ArcEm. Just to make sure it's really 2.00, is the rom file's SHA1 digest b82a78830dac386f9b649b6d32a34f9c6910546d? http://inputplus.co.uk/ralph/#acornem

Re: ArcEm Hard-disk and loading on Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu 8.04) - help

2008-11-01 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Patrick, Sorry for the delay; had paperwork deadlines. I suspect we're getting more into developer territory below, so I'm CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] as there's more people on the list and they'll know the code changes that have gone on. I have set the reply-to for there rather than