Re: [arch-dev-public] Add active Python versions to the repos

On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:32:22 + Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 09:13 -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Why did you start the discussion if you plan on ignoring other people's > > opinions anyway? > > > > Doug >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add active Python versions to the repos

On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:05:04 + Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote: > As long as there is someone willing to maintain the packages, why would we > block > it? I doesn't really have any effect on the rest of the people. If the person > start having trouble maintaining them, they can be

Re: [arch-dev-public] Orphaned packages from arcanis

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 20:09:12 +0100 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > Yo! > > As a followup from the recent TU removal, I have composed a list of orphaned > packages from arcanis. Please write back if you adopt anything else I'll drop > packages into the AUR after some time has

Re: [arch-dev-public] Add active Python versions to the repos

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:59:21 + Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 16:58 +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public > wrote: > > Am Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:34:24 + > > schrieb Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public > > : > > > > > > > Does anyone have any big issue

Re: [arch-dev-public] News draft: Bug wrangling day

On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:31:23 +0200 Frederik Schwan via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hi people, > > given the large amount of open bugs, I'd like to invite all users to help out > with an official announcement. > > > > > > Kill Arch Bugs: Help us on the 13th of September! > > > We would

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

On Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:43 -0300 Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote: > Em maio 21, 2019 2:24 Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public escreveu: > > > > Without looking at dracut yet, I have a few questions: > > - Is there a description how to move from mkinitcpio to dracut? > > No, not

Re: [arch-dev-public] Proposal: minimal base system

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:09:32 +0900 Jiachen YANG via arch-dev-public wrote: > Currently the "base" group serves at least 2 purposes for us: ... > 2. A base chroot environment for devtools/makechrootpkg to prepare > packaging. ... > Currently, devtools/makechrootpkg will install "base" group for

Re: [arch-dev-public] Removing 'orphan' python2 modules

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:48:07 +0200 j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote: > Jelle van der Waa schreef op 2018-06-27 21:35: > > Hi All, > > > > Our repository contains a lot of python2 modules which are required by > > any package in the repository. I'd like to propose to remove these > > modules

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] / [extra] cleanup

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:12:18 +0800 Felix Yan via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 06/05/2018 04:01 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On 02/06/18 17:06, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > >> Looking at the packages in the BUILDINFO rebuild list, I've found some > >> packages which are so old that they might

Re: [arch-dev-public] Automating package conflict resolution whenever possible (xorgproto/libxfont dependency conflict)

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:52:16 +0100 (CET) Alad Wenter via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public hat am 14. > > Februar 2018 um 01:48 geschrieben: > > > > > > On 02/13/2018 06:56 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: >

Re: [arch-dev-public] Automating package conflict resolution whenever possible (xorgproto/libxfont dependency conflict)

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:56:33 +0100 Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > Eli and I disagree about how dependency conflicts should be handled when > packaging. This was prompted by the libxfont dependency conflict arising > from recent xorgproto changes [1]. > > My

Re: [arch-dev-public] Windows Subsystem Linux - Arch Linux as official container?

On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:09:26 +0100 Thomas Bächler via arch-dev-public wrote: > Right now, I only have experience with the version before the fall > creators update, and that has issues: > > * As others mentioned, some glibc functionality relies on certain > clone()

Re: [arch-dev-public] Windows Subsystem Linux - Arch Linux as official container?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:14:55 +0100 Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:09:16PM -0600, Public mailing list for Arch Linux > development wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:00:28 +0100 > > Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public

Re: [arch-dev-public] Windows Subsystem Linux - Arch Linux as official container?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:00:28 +0100 Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hello everybody, > I would like to start a discussion about Windows Subsystem Linux and > Arch linux. You all might know that Microsoft has increased their > participation in open