Re: [arch-dev-public] OS News interview

2010-01-11 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > The OS News interview is up: > http://www.osnews.com/story/22692/Arch_Linux_Team > Fun interview. Allan's answers are the best, I have to say :) Some comments : - a few formatting issues. like the first reply from Thomas often misses a newli

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-23 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > > Because I'm also affected with my weird X200m card I'm still looking > for a good solution how to offer a good set of binary packages people > can use to try modern code. I could do this on my own like all other > people from AUR but we co

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.2-1

2009-12-23 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> First of all, Radeon KMS is not ready for production. Like with the >> intel driver, modesetting can be enabled by using radeon.modeset=1 in >> the bootflags if KMS is not enabled by default for Radeon. >> CONFIG_DRM_RADEON_KMS=y should

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-22 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > > Radeon kms is still buggy like hell and unusable for my RC410 [Radeon > Xpress 200M] card. It makes X and the whole system freeze instantly when > moving windows around or when I try to start 3d apps. Sometimes even > at Xorg start at all.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community 18-12-2009

2009-12-18 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:01 PM, wrote: > > Missing Dependencies > -- > community/eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' > extra/archboot --> 'libdownload>=1.3-3' > extra/digikam --> 'liblcms' > > Missing Makedepends > - > extra/kdelibs3 --> 'autoconf<2.64' > extra/

Re: [arch-dev-public] doc size

2009-12-16 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Xavier wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >>> Xavier wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I like this gnome feature th

Re: [arch-dev-public] doc size

2009-12-16 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Xavier wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I like this gnome feature that warns me about running out of space and >> proposes me to run a disk usage analyzer (baobab). >> Looking at the results, I found out

[arch-dev-public] doc size

2009-12-16 Thread Xavier
Hello, I like this gnome feature that warns me about running out of space and proposes me to run a disk usage analyzer (baobab). Looking at the results, I found out that /usr/share/doc was taking a non negligible space : 140M It's actually the 3rd biggest directory in my filesystem after two games

Re: [arch-dev-public] nouveau upgrade failed

2009-12-07 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Nouveau upgrade path was broken for me. It printed out to the screen > something like "module 'nouveau' not found" while building the new initrd. > It's not in the pacman.log. > > I'm using early kms mode. This probably happens because the new

Re: [arch-dev-public] Status of gimp/gimp-devel

2009-11-28 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Xavier wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Eric Bélanger >> wrote: >>> >>> As no-one seem to care, I'll go with option 2 and update the packages &

Re: [arch-dev-public] Status of gimp/gimp-devel

2009-11-28 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > > As no-one seem to care, I'll go with option 2 and update the packages > sometime this week-end or next week. > You remind me that I installed gegl and gimp git (AUR packages) 10 days ago : local/gegl-git 20091117-1 [1,75 MB] local/gimp-git

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] tzdata 2009s-1

2009-11-21 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > new upstream release. please signoff. > > -Andy > > The file... >        ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2009s.tar.gz > ...is now available; this reflects the (cosmetic) Antarctica change and the > DST-in-Fiji-in-2009-and-2010 change circ

Re: [arch-dev-public] Status of gimp/gimp-devel

2009-11-16 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, both gimp and gimp-devel are out of date. The latest > versions require updates of both babl and gegl but the gegl app in the > gegl package seg fault. This is a confirmed upstream issue: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_b

Re: [arch-dev-public] /var/empty

2009-11-01 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Roman Kyrylych > wrote: >> Shouldn't /var/empty be created by filesystem package, >> instead of by packages that require it? (like openssh and openntpd) > > It is. The problem is these packages "install" it in the

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 2/2] Change loop var CARCH to _arch

2009-10-28 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Francois Charette wrote: > This is just better practice, as CARCH means something else in > makepkg.conf > --- >  commitpkg |    8 >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/commitpkg b/commitpkg > index e805b47..10f58d9 100755 >

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.5-1

2009-10-23 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > New upstream release, please sign off. > > > Everyone who installed the broken testing/klibc updates for i686, do > yourself a favor and revert to the versions in core again BEFORE installing > a kernel update (pacman -S klibc klibc-extras

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg 7.5 hits testing

2009-10-15 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Jan de Groot wrote: > I got the legacy driver to compile yesterday, but it hangs up > completely. This Q35 system is forced to use the legacy driver, as this > system doesn't like UXA, and so doesn't work with xf86-video-intel. Not > with KMS, not without KMS. The

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg 7.5 hits testing

2009-10-14 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Eric Bélanger > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> I've built the new Xorg 7.5 based on xorg-server 1.7.1rc1 and Mesa 7.6. >>> >>> Some very old drivers have been dropped b

Re: [arch-dev-public] Xorg 7.5 hits testing

2009-10-13 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Mittwoch 14 Oktober 2009 00:23:10 schrieb Andreas Radke: >> Let's pray the update goes smooth. > > on my intel: AIGLX is disabled; no 3D at all; according to gtkperf 2d is a > little slower than before. > > on nvidia: xorg does not load t

Re: [arch-dev-public] About the vim packages (Opinions needed)

2009-10-12 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > > What we used to have is an accumulated patch. Everytime the package was > rebuilt, the missing patches got downloaded and attached to the > accumulated patch which was controlled in cvs at the time with the > PKGBUILD file. The advantage

Re: [arch-dev-public] About the vim packages (Opinions needed)

2009-10-12 Thread Xavier
t, and stick it in ftp/other/ for ABS users to rebuild > from. I believe this was proposed in a PKGBUILD Xavier emails around > (a _mksrc function similar to libfetch). It doesn't have to use CVS, > but if we provide a tarball somewhere and simply base the PKGBUILD off > that, inste

Re: [arch-dev-public] About the vim packages (Opinions needed)

2009-10-11 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > > Which brings me directly to the second point, the building system. Vim > follows a patch based approach which makes the PKGBUILD a fair bit > complex. All thes seemed to be fine for the last year but now people > seriously pester me that

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.2-1

2009-10-07 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Another upstream release, I want to move directly after signoff. > > Last minute changes: > > - Changed number of maximum serial ports to 32 > - Enabled ATI KMS (if this causes problems, blame Andy, he says it's fine > :D) > > Working fine on

[arch-dev-public] Bad behavior of dbscripts for custom variables

2009-10-01 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> What, dbscripts use _foo variables ? >> Doesn't that completely defeat the guideline we have in PKGBUILD man page : >> >>       If you need to create any custom variables for use in your build >>       process, it is recommended to name y

Re: [arch-dev-public] [aur-general] I need some help with nexuiz-data

2009-09-30 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > Xyne wrote: >> >> I sent a message to this list about this yesterday but it seems to have >> been lost. It seems that things like to stop working all at once. >> >> >> I can't get nexuiz-data into the database. I keep getting the followin

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 0/7] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2009-09-28 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Dan McGee wrote: > In the spirit of Eli making a bunch of patches for the AUR, I finally decided > to sit down tonight and figure out why the heck namcap was sucking it up, and > did a little code cleanup along the way. namcap.py is now a bit cleaner and > separate

Re: [arch-dev-public] automatic package builder

2009-09-25 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > Hey guys, > > Past week I was reading through the buildbot manual, but I decided not to > use it. IMO it is far too complex, fat and not something which has the > needed functionality easily available (you can extend it with python > scri

Re: [arch-dev-public] Replacing dcron

2009-09-22 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > We've had a few bugs regarding the issue of our crappy default cron. > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16085 > > On a related note: dcron does not support /etc/cron.d/ and it > irritates me to no end. fcron can do this, correct? If not, we s

Re: [arch-dev-public] Who broke devtools? - extrapkg svn commit == fail

2009-09-22 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Dan McGee wrote: >> >> Nice, what about my second point? Can we predefine a partial commit message >> that will need to be edited? > > I seemed to get overruled on that one. I know a lot of my commit > messages are going to be more worthless than before because I'm

Re: [arch-dev-public] Who broke devtools? - extrapkg svn commit == fail

2009-09-22 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > So, please have a look at the second block: > > if [ "$1" != "" ]; then >    svn commit -m "upgpkg: $pkgbase $pkgver-$pkgrel >    $1" > /dev/null >    if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then >        echo "Cancelled" >        exit 1 >    fi >    echo "===> C

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] check_packages : fix a bug when filling provisions

2009-09-20 Thread Xavier Chantry
-by: Xavier Chantry --- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py | 24 ++-- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py b/cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py index 25362c0..e8830e0 100755 --- a/cron

Re: [arch-dev-public] [aur-general] Integrity check emails

2009-09-18 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:21 AM, bardo wrote: > >> And yes, those duplicates are real dupes in community > > Dupes come mostly from the any-arch transition. In fact I had looked > around a bit, but couldn't find some king of guide - what exactly > should we untag on the repo to remove a specific a

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 18-09-2009

2009-09-18 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:26 AM, wrote: > > > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = > > > Performing integrity checks... > ==> parsing pkgbuilds > ==> parsing db files > ==> checking mism

Re: [arch-dev-public] Load_Cycle_Count and storage-fixup

2009-09-16 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > Hi all! > > I wanted to bring this long time ago when I discovered the problem > with my old Seagate Momentus 5400.3, but then forgot > since my new WD Scorpio Blue is less affected by this. > > But recently I noticed a couple of reports ab

Re: [arch-dev-public] devtools [PATCH] 2/2

2009-09-15 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Firmicus wrote: >> >> ... and a second one. >> >> Cheers, >> F >> > > Hmmm   finding it difficult to review this one. > But it was the easiest one ! Firmicus, what about using git send-email ? http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Super_Qui

Re: [arch-dev-public] Bluez maintainership

2009-09-11 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > I'm building GNOME 2.27.92 at this moment, and I'm coming to the point > where I have to package gnome-bluetooth. This package depends on a new > package called obexd, which seems to be in SVN, but not in the > repositories. It looks like som

Re: [arch-dev-public] adding support for Intel Atom-330/nVidia based motherboards sensors

2009-09-09 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1199797&page=1 > http://mabene.icomedias.com/coretemp.patch > got a mail about this kernel patch, i think it looks safe. > > Any objections in adding it before releasing 2.6.30.6? > It wil

Re: [arch-dev-public] [announcement] portmap replaced by rpcbind & big nfs-utils upgrade

2009-09-06 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > --Announce start > Hi community, > portmap is replaced by rpcbind in [core] repository. > It has more features, like ipv6 support and nfs4 support. > Please change your /etc/rc.conf file accordingly. > > Big nfs-utils upgrade: > - NFS4 sup

Re: [arch-dev-public] subversion older in testing

2009-09-02 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > we have svn pkg 1.6.4-2 in testing and a later 1.6.5-2 in extra-x86_64 > and an older one in extra-i686. > > any reason? I assume we need to rebuild 1.6.5-2 for i686 and clean up > the ones in testing? > > -Andy > you might already know this,

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.7.1-1

2009-09-02 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Xavier schrieb: >> >> it is written in the pkgbuild : >> # pacman.static build fails unless we keep the libtool files (or unless we >> link >> # the missing symbols inside the libarchive .a static lib,

Re: [arch-dev-public] making a devtools release

2009-09-02 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > > BTW, is there a way to generate the patch without some of the junk at > the begining like: > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > I just followed http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.7.1-1

2009-08-29 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:32, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Upstream release, signoff please. > > Doesn't seem to break anything here. > Signed off x86_64. > BTW, is /usr/lib/libarchive.la really needed for something? > > -- > Roman Kyrylych (Ром

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core, extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-29 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > >> Duplicate PKGBUILDs >> - >> > > Fixed. > >> Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends >> >> extra/texlive-genericextra depends on community/lzma-utils (0 extra >> (make)deps to pull) > > Fixed. > T

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] libarchive 2.7.1-1

2009-08-29 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Upstream release, signoff please. > > and here is the changelog : http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/wiki/ReleaseNotes * Issue 30 : Fix reading xz-compressed archives that require large decompression buffers * Issue 24 : Fix hang

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core, extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-28 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> That's right, I am aware of this problem but I am not sure how to fix it. >> >> Actually the script can already support that using >> --repos=core,extra,community >> but this will include all the community errors as well >> >> so it is t

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core, extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-28 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Xavier wrote: >> This is a manual run, after adding support to split packages. >> I checked some of the reported mistakes, I didn't find invalid ones, >> but it would be nice if t

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core,extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-28 Thread Xavier
This is a manual run, after adding support to split packages. I checked some of the reported mistakes, I didn't find invalid ones, but it would be nice if the responsible maintainers could double-check :) == = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = ===

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 07-08-2009

2009-08-28 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> Well this is completely broken now, mainly because of split packages >> (and maybe also a bit because of 'any'). >> I think this should be disabled for now, supporting split does not >> seem easy at all. >> >> As a sidenote, dependencies c

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH 2/2] add deplist to hierarchy problems

2009-08-27 Thread Xavier Chantry
extra (make)deps to pull) core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby (25 extra (make)deps to pull) the actual deps are only displayed when there are less than 10. Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry --- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packag

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/2] check_packages : add support for split packages.

2009-08-27 Thread Xavier Chantry
I just found a way to support split packages, by using $(type package_${pkg}), parsing that output and running eval on the relevant lines. This is a bit ugly, and while it works fine on my machine and my current abs tree, I cannot guarantee this code is bug free :) Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 07-08-2009

2009-08-11 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, wrote: > > == > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = > == > > Performing integrity checks... > ==> parsing pkgbuilds > ==> checking mismatches > ==> checking archs > ==> checking dependencies

Re: [arch-dev-public] general packaging question about symlinks

2009-07-27 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> >> That's a fair point, but what use is an Arch system that's not >> chrooted into? I don't expect /mnt/archlinux/usr/bin/gtkpod to work on >> a CentOS system. It sounds like an edge case. > > Not talking about binar

Re: [arch-dev-public] Multiple checksum support

2009-07-19 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Jan de Groot wrote: >> >> Recently the ftp-release-list for ftp.gnome.org has switched over to >> sha256sums, which means that I can't copy and paste checksums from the >> mailinglist anymore. I see that makepkg supports sha256 without >> proble

Re: [arch-dev-public] testing repo clear out

2009-07-15 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > libfetch can be moved to core, right? > libfetch will be a dependency of pacman 3.3, so I guess there are very few people using it right now. But at least it works fine here (i686) :) And it is the only package I install from testing.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xzutils 4.999.8beta-4

2009-07-01 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Pierre Schmitz schrieb: >> >> On Saturday 13 June 2009 12:55:46 Pierre Schmitz wrote: >>> >>> Added hack to remove rpath; see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15083 >> >> a signoff for x86_64 would be nice. >> > > Signoff x86_64 (btw, the kerne

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz-utils and libarchive-2.7.0-2

2009-06-02 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 23:18:17 schrieb Firmicus: >> > Both, gnu tar and bsdtar support the -J switch to compress and uncompress >> > xz archives. Did you try the recent packages from testin > > But it seems that "bsdtar -cf blah.tar.xz blah

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check status page

2009-03-13 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 18:14, Xavier wrote: >> I regularly check out the new results of the Integrity Checks, but it >> is not always easy to remember which issues were already reported and >> where. >> So I cr

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check status page

2009-03-13 Thread Xavier
I regularly check out the new results of the Integrity Checks, but it is not always easy to remember which issues were already reported and where. So I created my first wiki page to track that : http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Integrity_Check If you think this page is useful, but could be impr

Re: [arch-dev-public] xf86-video-nouveau/nouveau-drm in testing

2009-03-12 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Xavier wrote: > > If I usually don't need 3D support, I do need xv for video playback. > This didn't work by default. > I was told to run a composite manager (xcompmgr is enough) to make it > work, so I enabled composite extension i

Re: [arch-dev-public] xf86-video-nouveau/nouveau-drm in testing

2009-03-12 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Isenmann wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:55:31 +0100 > Andreas Radke wrote: > >> I've added xf86-video-nouveau + nouveau-drm to testing. Together with >> Xorg 7.5 this is a nice replacement for the binary crap when you don't >> need 3D stuff. 2D works well a

Re: [arch-dev-public] Move libtorrent-rasterbar to extra

2009-03-10 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 18:44, Xavier wrote: > [snip] >> So my favorite choice would be to have libtorrent-rakshasa and >> libtorrent-rasterbar :) > [snip] > > +1 > Ah, and there is another argument to keep

Re: [arch-dev-public] Move libtorrent-rasterbar to extra

2009-03-10 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jeff Mickey wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 14:47, Aaron Griffin wrote: >>> I don't think it would need versioning for that. libtorrent with >>> replaces=(libtorrent-rasterbar) in extra will take precedenc

[arch-dev-public] fakeroot sysv ipc bugs

2009-03-09 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Montag 09 März 2009 schrieb Andreas Radke: >> Am Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:00:16 +1000 >> >> schrieb Allan McRae : >> > Dan McGee wrote: >> > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Tobias Powalowski >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > >> Am Sonntag 08 März

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] syslog-ng-3.0.1-1

2009-03-08 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> I get same thing when running as root. Do you have a var symlink in >> /usr? If so, that's why it works for you. >> I don't know what could be the problem as we already use >> --localstatedir=/var/lib/syslog-ng.  Maybe there's a configur

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-db 2.5.3-2 replacing man

2009-02-19 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: >> Am Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:27:01 -0600 >> schrieb Dan McGee : >> >>> Don't Andy's and Jan's words here contradict with regard to creating >>> a man user? >>> >>> -Dan >>> >> >> This was m

Re: [arch-dev-public] state and maintainership of man(-db)/man-pages

2009-02-16 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: >> I'm almost for changing to man-db. We would just have to decide how to >> update the db. How is this currently done for "man"? In pacman? Could >> this be easily changed/added for man

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-pages 3.17-1

2009-02-16 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Xavier wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> [andy...@laptop64 ~]$ locate geteuid >>> /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl/auto/POSIX/geteuid.al >>> /usr/

Re: [arch-dev-public] what about "ed" now?

2009-02-06 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > I have made a change to the patch package that "ed" is now an optional > dependency. I've searched through our svn and all I've found is that no > other package depends on ed. I think "ed" is still a widely used *nix > editor and you would exp

Re: [arch-dev-public] install scripts in core

2009-02-03 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > > I am fairly sure that these install scripts seem to need bash on the *child* > system. > lilo, vi, mlocate (after add coreutils dep) and fakeroot all fail to run > their post install script with their current dependencies. Pulling in bash > t

Re: [arch-dev-public] install scripts in core

2009-02-03 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >> So it looks like we are really using the bash on the _child_ system, not >> the parent. Which would make sense (how do you chroot to the child system >> and still access the parents bash

Re: [arch-dev-public] install scripts in core

2009-02-03 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > glibc, db and shadow do not use post_install so they do not test the need > for bash. However, both readline and pam do use post_install so it appears > they are running. Why is that? Because the package do not actually include > the install

Re: [arch-dev-public] install scripts in core

2009-02-03 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > The way pacman calls the scriptlets, it actually uses the shell from > the _parent_ system. I know this for a fact, because Dan and I > investigated, added checks for bash in the chroot, then realized it > didn't matter and reverted it. > >

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] check_packages: fix stupid assumption on script location.

2009-02-01 Thread Xavier Chantry
arch-dev :) Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry --- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py b/cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py index f0fd4a5..0392368 100755 --- a

Re: [arch-dev-public] /usr/share/info/dir?

2009-01-25 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I don't know what this file is, but source-highlight contains > /usr/share/info/dir, which existed in my filesystem but didn't belong to any > package. Looks wrong to me ... > > It's wrong, I reported it nearly one week ago :) http://bugs.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-pages 3.17-1

2009-01-25 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > [andy...@laptop64 ~]$ locate geteuid > /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl/auto/POSIX/geteuid.al > /usr/share/man/man2/geteuid.2.gz > /usr/share/man/man2/geteuid32.2.gz > /usr/share/man/man3p/geteuid.3p.gz > /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/Process/Sys/geteuid

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.1-1

2009-01-19 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Hugo Doria wrote: > (sorry for the double post) > > kernel26 2.6.28.1 is running fine here now. So here goes my signoff for > x86_64. > > I think the problem was related with a bad download (or something like > this). Thomas had a different md5sum for /boot/vmlinu

Re: [arch-dev-public] Killing [unstable] for good

2009-01-17 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > Any qualms about killing [unstable] from our FTP completely? We still > have the directories and the "empty" databases sitting around. I think > we've given plenty of warning to people that unstable no longer > exists. > > At the very least, I'd

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64 16-01-2009

2009-01-16 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > repoma...@archlinux.org wrote: >> >> == >> = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = >> == > > So is this the i686 or x86_64 integrity check? > > > > There is a bigger probl

Re: [arch-dev-public] LZMA - in or out? ([signoff] libarchive 2.6.0)

2009-01-13 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Hugo Doria wrote: > Yep, > > Compress really takes a little longer, but IIRC decompress takes > almost the same time of gzip. > Also, if I am not mistaken, a given package is compressed only once, by the packager, but decompressed many many times (by all users).

Re: [arch-dev-public] split packages (WAS: Re: Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?)

2009-01-12 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Andreas Radke schrieb: >> >> just a small question: will the new makepkg with split support allow to >> us to build for several repos(e.g. libs to core and documentation to >> extra)? > > The problem is not makepkg. The problem is how we wil

[arch-dev-public] Repo Hierarchy problems

2009-01-11 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > > Check if these packages currently in extra have a (make)depends on > other packages from extra and so on. If these packages depends on too > many packages from extra, we might be better doing an exception and > keep them in extra. Otherwis

Re: [arch-dev-public] Heimdal changes - moving sqlite to core?

2009-01-11 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 > schrieb "Eric Bélanger" : > > BTW, it has a makedepends on >> tcl. We should keep tcl in extra as several other package in core >> have makedepends on packages from extra. >> > > That's something I really

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] check_packages : add --arch option.

2009-01-03 Thread Xavier Chantry
rsync/x86_64 --repos=community --arch=x86_64 Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry --- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py | 23 ++- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/parse_pkgbuilds.sh |9 - 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/cron

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core,extra

2009-01-03 Thread Xavier
== = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = == Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependen

Re: [arch-dev-public] python 2.6 rebuilds

2008-10-24 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for > i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs > will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticea

Re: [arch-dev-public] core and base cleanup, again

2008-10-17 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Half-OT: I think there are still some missing deps for some packages in the > base groups. Especially commands used in install script are often not covered. > Most of these commands will be installed during the first i

[arch-dev-public] squirrelmail duplicate

2008-10-15 Thread Xavier
squirrelmail exists in both extra (1.5.2cvs-7) and community (1.4.16-2). Is this normal? If both versions are needed, maybe the first package should be renamed to squirrelmail-cvs or similar.

Re: [arch-dev-public] xorg move to extra?

2008-10-15 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch 15 Oktober 2008 01:33:33 schrieb James Rayner: >> It'd be a good idea to set conflicts=() with the older nvidia/catalyst >> so that their xorg doesnt get upgraded, and thus their X isn't broken. >> That way we

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.27-1

2008-10-10 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't been able to keep up many of my packages, and I'm sorry. At > least this one was quick. kernel26 and the module packages are up in > testing for both architectures. Here is the bad news: > > - gspcav1 has been me

Re: [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64

2008-10-05 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Warning: Ensure your ABS tree is clean to prevent false positives. >> >> == >> = x86_64 Integrity Check = >> == >> >> Performing integrity c

Re: [arch-dev-public] Patching Flyspray is needed

2008-09-30 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, I'm not sure. > I saw a reminder about 0.9.9.5.1 a couple days ago when I logged in > after week offline, > but don't see it now, but there's still "Powered by Flyspray 0.9.9.5" > at the bottom. > > >> This bug is

Re: [arch-dev-public] Patching Flyspray is needed

2008-09-29 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again, > looks like I have mailday today :P > > I've noticed that someone updated Flyspray to the latest version > (haven't checked if "SQL error when searching" bug is fixed yet) > but it's needed to be patched every t

Re: [arch-dev-public] [Feature Request] add -g option for cp and mv

2008-09-28 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Andrea Scarpino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't know they. I'll try them, thanks. > > btw, I looked comments in the bug report. > Daenyth have persuaded me to keep the patch out from arch with these words: > > "Let's keep things minimal, I'm pretty sure the st

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] check_packages : improve the "skip klibc dep" hack.

2008-09-26 Thread Xavier Chantry
, dashes are possible too. Also the length of this string is always 27 chars, so we can use that. Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cron-jobs/check_arc

Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] check_packages : improve the "skip klibc dep" hack.

2008-09-26 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Xavier Chantry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is not possible to check the klibc dep on the PKGBUILD level, so I made a > hack to skip it. > This hack broke on klibc-jfflyAahxqaliwAofrf_fdf5upI because of the > underscore. > But we can sim

[arch-dev-public] [PATCH] check_packages : improve the "skip klibc dep" hack.

2008-09-26 Thread Xavier Chantry
string is always 27 chars, so we can use that. Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cron-jobs/check_archlinux/check_packages.py b/cron-jobs/check_arc

Re: [arch-dev-public] handling info files

2008-09-17 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that we decided that we want to ship info documentation we > should decide how to package such files: info files could be gzipped by > makepkg or stay uncompressed. > > On my system they already take quiet a lot of spac

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] udev 128-1

2008-09-12 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Bächler schrieb: >> >> I applied the patch to hal and threw it to testing. I had another user >> test this: Without the patch, Xorg input hotplugging broke. When he added >> the udevinfo script like above, it worked

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iwlwifi-3945-ucode 15.28.1.6-1

2008-09-12 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't have the card, but this is a hardware thing... if you need > another signoff to get things moving, count me signed off > Works fine here, so you also have an user signoff i686.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] udev 128-1

2008-09-12 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I still lose (at least) my wireless network connection when I update to this > udev version. I'm using gnome-network-manager with an Intel PRO/Wireless > 3945ABG card and iwlwifi. Trying to figure this out now because I

  1   2   >