On 11.06.2017 01:39, Allan McRae wrote:
> I am very against this part (hook is completely fine). Having the perl
> executable be something other than upstream (and every other distro)
> provides, is not what Arch is about.
Noted
> I'm assuming the new location would be transparent to packagers
On 11/06/17 08:03, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> One possibility to counter this would be to replace the perl executable
> with a wrapper that performs the check and prints errors to stderr.
> Optionally it could also exit with an error code rather than continuing
> to run the script.
2 matches
Mail list logo
