On 2018-03-13 15:32, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> This wrapper changes depending on which version of meson you have installed.
The wrapper is part of the package that changes.
> The fact that autoconf has weird bugs like needing to set localstatedir
> and sysconfdir to their
On 2018-03-13 14:40, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 13/03/18 21:22, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> For that matter, I'm all for putting an arch-configure helper into our
>> autoconf package.
>
> Don't muck around with vanilla packages. Put it in another package
On 03/13/2018 07:22 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote:
> It's not magical. This doesn't even compare to dpkg-buildpackage's hooks
> and buildsystem handling, which changes behavior drastically based on
> what's installed and what the source tree looks like.
>
> arch-meson is just a wrapper
On 13/03/18 21:22, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public wrote:
> For that matter, I'm all for putting an arch-configure helper into our
> autoconf package.
Don't muck around with vanilla packages. Put it in another package
(devtools).
A
On March 13, 2018 2:07:31 PM GMT+01:00, Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>Le 13/03/2018 à 13:42, Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public a écrit :
>
>> El martes, 13 de marzo de 2018 11:23:07 (CET) Bruno Pagani via
>arch-dev-public escribió:
>>> Some projects
Le 13/03/2018 à 13:42, Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public a écrit :
> El martes, 13 de marzo de 2018 11:23:07 (CET) Bruno Pagani via
> arch-dev-public escribió:
>> Some projects seems to default to Debug instead of None… So should we
>> specify a BUILD_TYPE of None instead of Release?
>>
> Not
El martes, 13 de marzo de 2018 11:23:07 (CET) Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public
escribió:
> Some projects seems to default to Debug instead of None… So should we
> specify a BUILD_TYPE of None instead of Release?
>
Not sure if it's a good idea to systematically override the build type when it
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 1:43 AM Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
> While we are at it, someone has seen fit to create some arbitrary meson
> wrapper called "arch-meson" (note we have never shipped an arch-cmake
> nor an arch-configure, nor an arch-setup-py
Le 11/03/2018 à 10:00, Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public a écrit :
> El domingo, 11 de marzo de 2018 1:44:07 (CET) Eli Schwartz via
> arch-dev-public escribió:
>> This theoretically sounds like a fantastic idea, but I'm not really sure
>> what CMake's deal with build flags are in the first
9 matches
Mail list logo