On 11/6/18 8:49 PM, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public wrote:
> [2018-11-06 12:13:54 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
>> Le 06/11/2018 à 11:37, Allan McRae a écrit :
>>> But because you asked my opinion, I think a TU council is
>>> a really, really, really bad idea. No need to set some
[2018-11-06 12:13:54 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
> Le 06/11/2018 à 11:37, Allan McRae a écrit :
> > But because you asked my opinion, I think a TU council is
> > a really, really, really bad idea. No need to set some TUs above
> > others.
> Well some already are, because they are
On 11/6/18 7:32 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> Here again I would argue that they are devs that have [core] pushing
>> rights, as well as devs that are Master Key holders. So even if you
>> don’t want to write this black on white, this actually means a small
>> group of
On 06/11/2018 12.13, Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Yeah, but [community] used to be something completely separated from
> [extra]. This is less and less the case (numerous packages were moved
> from [extra] to [community] so that TUs could maintain them for
> instance). The line
Le 06/11/2018 à 11:37, Allan McRae a écrit :
> On 6/11/18 8:15 pm, Bruno Pagani wrote:
>> Le 06/11/2018 à 11:12, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:09:03PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 6/11/18 7:54 pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:37:42PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 6/11/18 8:15 pm, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> > Le 06/11/2018 à 11:12, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public a écrit :
> >> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:09:03PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >>> On 6/11/18 7:54 pm, Christian Rebischke via
On 6/11/18 8:15 pm, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> Le 06/11/2018 à 11:12, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public a écrit :
>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:09:03PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> On 6/11/18 7:54 pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hello everybody,
First of all,
Le 06/11/2018 à 11:12, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:09:03PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 6/11/18 7:54 pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> First of all, the following mail has nothing to do with the
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:09:03PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 6/11/18 7:54 pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > First of all, the following mail has nothing to do with the last two TU
> > applications, it's a general view on the current TU
On 6/11/18 7:54 pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> First of all, the following mail has nothing to do with the last two TU
> applications, it's a general view on the current TU application process.
>
> I would like to propose a new process for TU
Hello everybody,
First of all, the following mail has nothing to do with the last two TU
applications, it's a general view on the current TU application process.
I would like to propose a new process for TU applications due to several
reasons:
1. I have the feeling that most sponsors are not
11 matches
Mail list logo
