Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] systemd service files policy

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: 1) Use the upstream service files whenever they exist. This should be a SHOULD and not a MUST. Some service files can be poorly implemented or some deps are missing (e.g. your point 5) and be overloaded by maintainer. Of course

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] systemd service files policy

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: I think we should _not_ use Type=Forking, except when it's the only choice. Systemd

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Python 3.3.0 and PEP 394

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org wrote: Any opinions ? I think this PEP give convention between distro and python developers to have portable scripts. Our part is to provide python2* and python3* symlinks. The dev parts is to use correct sheebang is

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Python 3.3.0 and PEP 394

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org wrote: Le 2012-09-13 08:04, Allan McRae a écrit : On 13/09/12 21:53, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: Le 2012-09-13 00:18, Allan McRae a écrit : On 13/09/12 10:00, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: Python 3.3.0 should be

[arch-dev-public] [RFC] The path to lua 5.2

Hello, Version 5.2 of lua is out since December 2011 [1] and last update since June 2012. I suggest[2] to update our current lua package to 5.2.1 and introduce a new package lua51. As we need to rebuild and update dependencies of some packages, we can benefits to adopt a clean naming (like for

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Python 3.3.0 and PEP 394

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote: On 13.09.2012 22:03, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: On 14 September 2012 02:18, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: We also have python libraries not prefixed by python- (e.g: pyalpm, pycups, pygtk, etc), I think we

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dropping cpufrequtils

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: Hi guys, As was discussed some time ago, I'd like to drop cpufrequtils from our repos. It is dead upstream, and has been replaced by cpupower (in community). I see no reason to move cpupower out of community, but let me know

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dropping cpufrequtils

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2012-09-14 01:43:30 +0200] Sébastien Luttringer: Kyle Keen told me on IRC that archboot is now broken because it depends of cpufrequtils. Anyone can pick it up there and maintain it: https

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] The path to lua 5.2

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org wrote: Le 2012-09-13 16:19, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit : Hello, Version 5.2 of lua is out since December 2011 [1] and last update since June 2012. I suggest[2] to update our current lua package to 5.2.1

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] The path to lua 5.2

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org wrote: Le 2012-09-13 16:19, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit : Hello, Version 5.2 of lua is out since December 2011 [1] and last update

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Python 3.3.0 and PEP 394

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote: Xyne didn't appear to have write access so passing on his message as follows: -- Forwarded message -- From: Xyne x...@archlinux.ca Date: 14 September 2012 19:57 Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC]

Re: [arch-dev-public] Transitioning between incompatible language versions

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Comments? I'd like to get this sorted quickly so we can get the python and lua rebuilds done. My suggestion would be to simplify the both case into the first. Simpler is the policy, easier is to apply. Here we make 2

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] The path to lua 5.2

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: I think we should provide lua and lua51 packages with as much as possible built using the lua (5.2) package and the rest built for lua51. That may mean we need to provide lua51 versions of libraries too for the

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] btrfs multi-device support in pre-3.6 kernels

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: Any thoughts? That's fine, in my opinion. People running Btrfs shouldn't be using an LTS kernel anyway. Same opinion but can you think about updating

Re: [arch-dev-public] [netcfg] Add to base group?

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: With systemd being the default, we have no simple network management besides dhcp by default. Should we add netcfg to the base group so it is installed by default? We already have dhcpd in base group. We can enable

Re: [arch-dev-public] consolekit dependencies?

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Most (all?) of our login manager still depend on consolekit. However, since consolekit support will be stripped from polkit when gnome-unstable goes to testing (soon?), registering consolekit sessions on login has no

Re: [arch-dev-public] [netcfg] Add to base group?

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote: Am Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:34:58 +0200 schrieb Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org: With systemd being the default, we have no simple network management besides dhcp by default. Should we add netcfg to the base group so

Re: [arch-dev-public] Unannounced mass edit of community PKGBUILDs

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2012-10-25 10:07:09 +0300] Evangelos Foutras: I noticed that all of my community packages were modified by r78782 [1] (Full pkgdesc cleanup for 2339 packages). Being a fierce proponent of single quotes myself, your

Re: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru: We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org. what is the purpose of those? Hostnames for

Re: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 28.10.2012 02:10, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru: We should finally have proper aliases

Re: [arch-dev-public] [community] migration guide to nymeria

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2012-11-12 20:07:39 +0100] Florian Pritz: [community] has now moved to nymeria. Thanks for all the efforts you put into this. One remark though: could we lose the last two lines of /etc/bash.bashrc and keep a

Re: [arch-dev-public] enlightenment dr17

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Enlightenment dr17 is going to be released soon (no, really this time). The libs are already released as stable, while the window manager is currently released in alpha status and a stable version will be released

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] the future of /media

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: Hi guys, With udisks2 being used by gnome, and about to be used by the next KDE, some people have raised concerns about the transition from udisks1 to udisks2. The issue is: udisks1 mounts your devices to /media, whereas

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] The path to lua 5.2

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: I think we should provide lua and lua51 packages with as much as possible built using the lua (5.2) package and the rest built for lua51

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: ndisc6 I took this one. I use it. Cheers, -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [arch-dev-public] Clarity about initscripts and systemd status

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 November 2012 16:03, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky: It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts from their package would notify

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: lua-sql-mysql lua-sql-postgres lua-sql-sqlite This is part of split package luasql, which was maintained by Sergey and was renamed during lua 5.2 upgrade. I believe he does't take it again on archweb. Cheers, --

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: There is nothing stopping us dropping vi completely and just putting vim on the install media... I'd favor that (as a vim user who always gets confused

[arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add Wayland/Weston

Hello gentleman, Wayland is now in version 1.0.4[1]. I plan to move it to community to offer a first support of the wayland protocol into Archlinux. This will allow toolkit[2][3] packages to smoothly enable wayland support when maintainers wants and let users try this next-to-systemd-troll[4].

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in weston/repos (4 files)

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Why are you putting this in [community-testing]? The package is in extra! Wayland is in extra Weston is in commuity-testing -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add Wayland/Weston

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: Hello gentleman, Wayland is now in version 1.0.4[1]. I plan to move it to community to offer a first support of the wayland protocol into Archlinux. This will allow toolkit[2][3] packages to smoothly enable wayland

Re: [arch-dev-public] linux-3.8.0-1

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: On 20/02/13 20:19, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Am 20.02.2013 19:13, schrieb Ionut Biru: On 02/20/2013 07:50 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi, I built the kernel, now there are issues with nvidia, lirc and propably

Re: [arch-dev-public] cleaning up unneeded static libraries?

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote: Our packages in our repos by default don't need static libraries (random .a files all around). I think they are a waste of disc space and abuse bandwidth when uploading/mirroring packages. Most users will never need

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add Wayland/Weston

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: ... Some news from the front: - Wayland is in extra, thanks to Tom G. for moving it. - Mesa and cairo have their wayland backend enabled

Re: [arch-dev-public] cleaning up unneeded static libraries?

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote: Our packages in our repos by default don't need static libraries (random .a files all around). I think they are a waste of disc space

Re: [arch-dev-public] cleaning up unneeded static libraries?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2013-03-02 15:17:02 +0100] Jelle van der Waa: Can't we add a rule to namcap, which warns packagers about static libs? Then the packager can decide whether they should included or removed. Most packagers would not

Re: [arch-dev-public] [core] build report

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, This build was done with a chroot containing only base-devel and sudo. Not many packages failed due to this, and can readily be fixed by adding makedepends. So it seems the idea of reducing our build chroots down is

Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: Currently we use the BIND code base in two packages: - dnsutils from [core] provides basic DNS query tools; - bind from [extra] is the actual name server. With the new BIND10 release, the ISC really outdid themselves:

Re: [arch-dev-public] pacman-4.1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, Pacman-4.1.0 is released and in the [testing] repos. See my blog [1] for details of what is new in this release. With this commit[1], can we assume that install script should now be written in bash? [1]

Re: [arch-dev-public] pacman-4.1

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 05/04/13 07:42, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, Pacman-4.1.0 is released and in the [testing] repos. See my blog [1] for details of what

Re: [arch-dev-public] linux-3.9.0-1 in testing

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, - virtualbox-modules Please fix the PKGBUILD that it works with .0 kernels too, I had to hardcode the 3.9.0 into it. Ah now I see why Ioni had issues with kernel bump. Do you have a way to guess

Re: [arch-dev-public] linux-3.9.0-1 in testing

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 01.05.2013 01:52, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, - virtualbox-modules Please fix the PKGBUILD that it works with .0

Re: [arch-dev-public] Merging the bin directories

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 12.05.2013 13:13, schrieb Tom Gundersen: List of showstoppers: - Shells (with hardcoded paths in users' passwd) - fsck helpers (all hardcoded to be in /sbin) All mount and fsck helpers should be ok to move to

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in fail2ban/trunk (PKGBUILD)

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski bpiotrow...@nymeria.archlinux.org wrote: Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 @ 22:22:08 Author: bpiotrowski Revision: 90846 upgpkg: fail2ban 0.8.8-3 - correct path to sendmail due to migration to /usr/bin I see you moved exim from

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in fail2ban/trunk (PKGBUILD)

, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski bpiotrow...@nymeria.archlinux.org wrote: I'm not following. If this path is hardcoded in several packages (and presumably in lots of custom packages/scripts), isn't this precisely one of the cases where we should

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in fail2ban/trunk (PKGBUILD)

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl wrote: On 2013-05-14 22:37, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski bpiotrow...@nymeria.archlinux.org wrote: Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 @ 22:22:08 Author: bpiotrowski

Re: [arch-dev-public] Merging the bin directories

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Some packages clearly can not have that done and will have to wait until we are prepared to replace those directories with symlinks. Once we see how many packages are left, we can start planning to finally get rid of

Re: [arch-dev-public] Finishing the /usr move

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 30/05/13 06:23, Eric Bélanger wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: I'm bored of waiting... so lets do this!

Re: [arch-dev-public] Finishing the /usr move

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: And it is now in the [testing] repository. A reminder of the upgrade instructions: 1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin to put those files in /usr/bin. The list of packages to be

Re: [arch-dev-public] Finishing the /usr move

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 31/05/13 21:03, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: And it is now in the [testing] repository. A reminder of the upgrade instructions: 1) Fix any non

Re: [arch-dev-public] [FYI] New developer: Laurent Carlier

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: Hi all, The devs would like to welcome Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) on board as a new dev. Laurent has been a Trusted User for a number of years, and he has a consistent track-record of being easy to work with, being

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] /etc/shells should keep /bin/zsh

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote: On 1 July 2013 18:32, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 01/07/13 20:11, Karol Blazewicz wrote: I know arch-general si not for reporting bugs and I'm not trying to rush anyone, but it's been already a month of

Re: [arch-dev-public] rc.d files, unmaintained packages - and, the quality of our repositories

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote: As for the whole push first discuss later thing, people shouldn't be afraid to take this approach. Maybe I misused it but back in my day there was an Arch dev who had wise words

Re: [arch-dev-public] rc.d files, unmaintained packages - and, the quality of our repositories

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Massimiliano Torromeo massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.netwrote: By your light way of doing, you cause troubles to users of netctl Not taking a particular side here but maybe I'm

[arch-dev-public] Nginx

Hello, Talking about improvment on nginx package with Bartłomiej, it was suggested to push this publicly to let everyone be confident with. Nginx is a web server with modules selected (or added from external sources) at the *build* time. So we cannot package them separately and install them when

Re: [arch-dev-public] Nginx

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Am 02.08.2013 14:14, schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski: On 2013-08-02 08:41, Pierre Schmitz wrote: If you abuse the split package this way, you still have to rebuild and publish both split packages if e.g. the passenger

Re: [arch-dev-public] Nginx

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Am 02.08.2013 15:38, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: Does anybody know why the devs don't want or implemented modules than can be loaded at runtime? http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,123868,124118#msg-124118 Cheers

Re: [arch-dev-public] Nginx

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 03/08/13 00:59, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am 02.08.2013 15:38, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: Nothing should block a nginx update, so if auth-pam is incompatible, it will be dropped. Passenger external module

Re: [arch-dev-public] I do not wish to be a bug tracker webmaster

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, Since I don't know where to put this, please please PLEASE stop assigning me to bugs/feature requests/etc. related to the bugtracker. Just because I maintain the home page doesn't mean I maintain everything web

Re: [arch-dev-public] Moving two unneeded orphans from [community] to AUR

On 04/11/2013 11:54, Alexander Rødseth wrote: gnome-commander was last updated 2011-12-10, is currently an orphan and no other package needs it. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/gnome-commander/ perl-config-ini was last updated 2013-10-28, is currently an orphan and no

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-commits] Commit in (9 files)

On 27/11/2013 11:35, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 27.11.2013 11:29, schrieb Allan McRae: Please don't do this... 11 line output in post_install. If you REALLY need this, use a single line pointing to the wiki page. Allan Usage instructions generally don't belong into install/upgrade

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-commits] Commit in (9 files)

On 27/11/2013 14:57, Alexander Rødseth wrote: A bit sad to be starting out the new docker package with the mark of shame (epoch=1), but so be it. ;) Summary / suggsted plan: 1. Rename docker (the old one) to docker-tray and add replaces=('docker=1.5') 2. Upload and add epoch=1 to docker

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-commits] Commit in (9 files)

On 27/11/2013 15:31, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 27/11/2013 14:57, Alexander Rødseth wrote: A bit sad to be starting out the new docker package with the mark of shame (epoch=1), but so be it. ;) I'm waiting some answer before pushing this package in our repository. I got answers/help from

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-commits] Commit in (9 files)

On 28/11/2013 07:22, Daniel Isenmann wrote: Am 28.11.2013 02:15, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: On 27/11/2013 15:31, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 27/11/2013 14:57, Alexander Rødseth wrote: A bit sad to be starting out the new docker package with the mark of shame (epoch=1), but so

[arch-dev-public] Moving packages into community

Hi, Most of the time, when a TU is working on adding a new package to community, he could: - Send a message on aur-gene...@al.org - Write some lines in the AUR package comments - Open a BR for inclusion - Push his new package to community. This let him time to carefully: - Test his modification

Re: [arch-dev-public] Moving packages into community

On 11/02/2014 14:39, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: On 02/11/2014 02:37 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: - Send a message on aur-gene...@al.org - Write some lines in the AUR package comments - Open a BR for inclusion - Push his new package to community This is a short list of well known places

Re: [arch-dev-public] Looking for maintainers for a few packages

On 08/03/2014 04:59, Allan McRae wrote: I can spend more time dealing with pacman (the patches pile up faster than I can deal with them and there are things I want to implement...). Nice! Here is a list of what is on offer: All these packages interest me, but I prefer only take care of:

Re: [arch-dev-public] brynhild down a.k.a pkgbuild.com

On 22/03/2014 18:15, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Update, they found nothing, that's not a surprise and we always had a problem with it (bit flip problem from time to time). I think is time to stop using this server and get a newer one. You guys mentioned that ecc it's a must. They have ex60 now with

Re: [arch-dev-public] brynhild down a.k.a pkgbuild.com

On 22/03/2014 19:50, Florian Pritz wrote: Disclaimer: I have experience with multiple Hetzner boxes, their support work flow and they have a forum which has a good amount of insider info which I like a lot. Better the devil you know ... The relation with your box provider is very important and

[arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add ARM to archlinux.org

Hello, As you may know I'm running ARM[1] since the last maintainer resign in August 2013. I would like to propose its addition into our official services. My current suggestion is to keep the current server and hierarchy and to move it under an archlinux.org subdomain. So far, best suggestions

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add ARM to archlinux.org

On 24/03/2014 23:50, Dave Reisner wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:35:36PM +0100, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: Does 2013 cover the whole year? Four full months. More details in listing this page[1] You're suggesting that 2014 will occupy over 200GB. We'd need new infrastructure

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add ARM to archlinux.org

On 25/03/2014 01:44, Dave Reisner wrote: Right, but throwing this responsibility on the arms of Arch developers isn't really a solution, either, without quiescence. You seem to be of the mindset of that adding this to the archlinux.org domain will magically lighten your own sysadmin load. I'm

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add ARM to archlinux.org

On 25/03/2014 02:02, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2014-03-25 00:55:51 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer: On 24/03/2014 23:50, Dave Reisner wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:35:36PM +0100, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: Does 2013 cover the whole year? That'd take 200 GB of disk space. Would you have

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add ARM to archlinux.org

On 25/03/2014 02:15, keenerd wrote: On 3/24/14, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote: The Rollback Machine has a convenient CLI wrapper to access packages. Have you tried using the Rollback Machine with just a browser? It is nearly impossible. The CLI wrapper makes it much nicer. I

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add ARM to archlinux.org

On 25/03/2014 08:04, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 24.03.2014 23:35, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: Hello, As you may know I'm running ARM[1] since the last maintainer resign in August 2013. I would like to propose its addition into our official services. As a side not, may I point out

Re: [arch-dev-public] providing grsecurity in [community]

On 18/04/2014 10:44, Daniel Micay wrote: On 18/04/14 04:09 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 16/04/2014 06:09, Daniel Micay wrote: I could build these myself when I push a new version, because there aren't many of them. When I will push a new version of Virtualbox, which currently provides

Re: [arch-dev-public] providing grsecurity in [community]

On 18/04/2014 11:40, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: In data venerdì 18 aprile 2014 11:34:14, Sébastien Luttringer ha scritto: On 18/04/2014 10:44, Daniel Micay wrote: On 18/04/14 04:09 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 16/04/2014 06:09, Daniel Micay wrote: I could build these myself when I

Re: [arch-dev-public] providing grsecurity in [community]

On 18/04/2014 13:07, Daniel Micay wrote: On 18/04/14 05:34 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 18/04/2014 10:44, Daniel Micay wrote: On 18/04/14 04:09 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 16/04/2014 06:09, Daniel Micay wrote: There's no problem with simply not building a VirtualBox module

Re: [arch-dev-public] providing grsecurity in [community]

On 19/04/2014 01:21, Connor Behan wrote: On 18/04/14 04:09 AM, S?bastien Luttringer wrote: On 16/04/2014 06:09, Daniel Micay wrote: I don't think it makes sense to bother with the nvidia module because it would be a bit silly to mix it with grsecurity. Why user with nvidia cards should be

Re: [arch-dev-public] perf-trace missing due to a dependency on libaudit

On 05/05/2014 00:56, Daniel Micay wrote: The lesser evil seems to be adding only a libaudit package... but it's still not going to work if someone tries to use it for what it's intended to do. I'll probably go with this if there's no saner idea. I think it's a good thing to restore perf trace

Re: [arch-dev-public] [Draft] MariaDB 10.0 enters [extra]

On 17/05/2014 14:57, Allan McRae wrote: On 17/05/14 22:40, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: It's temporarily built using Clang, mainly because new gcc snapshot hasn't fixed segfaults for everyone. Please file bug reports for breakages caused by the gcc update. I can not track/report/fix bugs

[arch-dev-public] Moving network stuff to extra

Hello, I plan to move netfilter libraries and tools to extra to have all the basic kernel network tools into our first class repository :) We currently have iptables in core but ebtables, arptables and the next generation framework nftables into community. I'm also thinking about moving some

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Moving mail away from gerolde

On 25/06/2014 22:17, Florian Pritz wrote: On 23.06.2014 19:42, Florian Pritz wrote: I haven't yet look into also migrating mailman from gudrun to nymeria or maybe alderaan. When I created aur-requests I had to edit 3 files on 2 hosts to get the list to work. I'd like to change that so

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in arpwatch/trunk (PKGBUILD)

Hi, That's not a smooth change! Although that seems an easy way to differentiate arpwatch traffic from root one, a small message in the .install should be the minimum. That break most users setup. Regards, On 06/06/2014 19:28, Sergej Pupykin wrote: Date: Friday, June 6, 2014 @ 19:28:18

Re: [arch-dev-public] Virtualbox binary modules maintainer

On 16/07/2014 19:39, Dave Reisner wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:26:16PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: I guess this is/was you? It was Bartłomiej. I'm not interested, but this is pretty vague. How much time is involved? How often? Are there open bugs? Have you worked with upstream

Re: [arch-dev-public] Virtualbox binary modules maintainer

On 16/07/2014 22:13, Dave Reisner wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:05:50PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 16/07/2014 19:39, Dave Reisner wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:26:16PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: Building modules on boot is doing it too late. It's on the same plane

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] Commit in roundcubemail/trunk (PKGBUILD)

Sergej, That's not *again* a smooth change! It breaks the logs and files upload for person using the previous default config. Why do not you put a message to inform that you will change paths? Regards, On 25/06/2014 19:06, Sergej Pupykin wrote: Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 @ 19:06:46

Re: [arch-dev-public] systemd 216 coming soon to testing

On 20/08/2014 20:25, Dave Reisner wrote: For packagers: - systemd-sysusers is now a reasonable thing as it now reads and writes to /etc/shadow and /etc/gshadow. This means that we can simplify the filesystem package immensely, and packages which want to ship their own runtime users can

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fosdem 2015

On 28/08/2014 20:07, Jelle van der Waa wrote: If we want to organise something as Arch Linux we have to pay attention to the following dates: I'll be there too. That would be great if we could use this European event to spend some time together. I'm sure this will improve our way of working

Re: [arch-dev-public] Virtualbox binary modules maintainer

On 16/07/2014 19:26, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: Last maintainer of virtualbox binary modules has resigned. For the last releases of linux-lts[1], virtualbox-modules-lts[2] was not rebuilt, resulting in bug reports[3][4] with nobody interested to fix. Is there a volunteer to take care of them

Re: [arch-dev-public] perf-trace missing due to a dependency on libaudit

On 26/08/2014 11:18, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 05/05/2014 00:56, Daniel Micay wrote: The lesser evil seems to be adding only a libaudit package... but it's still not going to work if someone tries to use it for what it's intended to do. I'll probably go with this if there's no saner idea

Re: [arch-dev-public] Mailinglist setup changes

On 26/09/2014 18:44, Florian Pritz wrote: Hi, As discussed a couple months ago I've finally moved mailman from gudrun to luna. Creating new lists from the web interface will now work without admin intervention, but the new list will only be available via listn...@lists.archlinux.org, not

Re: [arch-dev-public] user/group management in packages

On 03/02/2015 17:16, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On 03/02/15 17:58, Andrew Gregory wrote: -1 for systemd-sysusers unless you can figure out a way to use it in pre_install. In order for the dynamic user creation Allan mentioned to work, pacman will have to be changed to use symbolic user names

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-events] Arch Linux lanyards for FOSDEM

On 08/01/2015 12:05, Andrea Scarpino wrote: I'd like to know how many AL devs/TUs will participate to FOSDEM so I can keep one for each official contributor at least. I have not booked yet, but I plan to come. Cheers, -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer Archlinux Developer https://seblu.net |

Re: [arch-dev-public] Bug tracker permissions

On 02/03/2015 14:10, Allan McRae wrote: The TUs can not see these requests to act on them. All developers were given project manager permissions long time ago - should TUs also get this? Or should we wait to see how the bug wrangler goes at reducing the queue? Hi, Make sense to open bug

[arch-dev-public] Moving ceph to extra

Hello, I plan to move ceph from AUR to extra in order to add rdb support to qemu. Plebiscite? Objections? Regards, -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] archive.archlinux.org

On Sat, 2015-10-17 at 15:49 -1000, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2015-10-17 21:02:00 +0200] Sébastien Luttringer: > I just have one question. What is "fsociety.archlinux.org" for? Could > it > follow our current naming scheme? Is it different from > "archive.al.org&qu

Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] archive.archlinux.org

On Sat, 2015-10-17 at 21:26 -0500, Daniel Wallace wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Gaetan Bisson > wrote: > My question about this is if we allow this into the repositories, an > ability to go get unsupported package > easily to install on your system even with a

Re: [arch-dev-public] agetpkg in [extra]

On Sat, 2015-10-17 at 13:08 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > Sébastien, > > is there any reason why agetpkg landed directly in [extra]? Your > mirror > isn't hosted as an official Arch project so far, despite our previous > discussions on IRC. I don't mind its presence in [community], but >

[arch-dev-public] [RFC] archive.archlinux.org

Hello, More than one year ago[1] we started to discuss making the Arch Rollback Machine more official. There were pros and cons and I would give us the opportunity to move forward. ARM was renamed to Archlinux Archive, following suggestions made earlier. The ALA acronym is now preferred to avoid

  1   2   >