Hello,
I have already been used to not beeing able to suspend my MacBook Pro
since the buggy nvidia version which came with 3.4.x kernel. But as of
the latest updates which brought kernel 3.4.5-1 I am not able to use
pm-hibernate anymore.
When looking into /var/log/pm-suspend.log it seems that
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 08:05:33 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
Hello,
I have already been used to not beeing able to suspend my MacBook Pro
since the buggy nvidia version which came with 3.4.x kernel. But as of
the latest updates which brought kernel 3.4.5-1 I am not able to use
pm-hibernate
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Arvid Warnecke ar...@nostalgix.org wrote:
When looking into /var/log/pm-suspend.log it seems that hibernating went
well: lots of success messages and no errors. But when I then start
the MacBook again it does not resume but boots normally. fsck detects
that
On 07/20/2012 01:56 PM, fredbezies wrote:
Well, looks like Ionut Biru forget to rebuild virtualbox modules. Both
vboxdrv and vboxnetflt cannot be loaded.
A rebuild of virtualbox-modules fixed it :)
I did not forget, Tobias just doesn't use staging and proper todo lists
to coordinate the
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@googlemail.com wrote:
Packer must be new somehow, did not hear about it before (only about
yaourt).
The thread is 2.5 years old
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=88115 and the wiki
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Helpers
2012/7/20 Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org:
On 07/20/2012 01:56 PM, fredbezies wrote:
Well, looks like Ionut Biru forget to rebuild virtualbox modules. Both
vboxdrv and vboxnetflt cannot be loaded.
A rebuild of virtualbox-modules fixed it :)
I did not forget, Tobias just doesn't use staging
On 20 July 2012 09:27, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
could you try the same with the long lived branch of nvidia utils and drivers?
these are at version 295.59
nvidia-ll: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60602
nvidia-utils-ll:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 16:11:43 schreef Lukáš Jirkovský:
On 20 July 2012 09:27, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
could you try the same with the long lived branch of nvidia utils and
drivers?
these are at version 295.59
nvidia-ll:
Guus Snijders said the following at 07/20/2012 04:13 AM :
I'm a bit confused at this point if filesystem is now upgraded or not.
Your confusion can't possibly be as great as mine :-)
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR or the
official arch repositories, so I don't
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would guess
the
following should work:
pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem --ignore glibc
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Guus Snijders gsnijd...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit confused at this point if filesystem is now upgraded or not.
If i understand correctly, the symlinks for /var/run and /var/lock are
there already.
You should always have the symlink, regardless of whether or
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR or the
official arch repositories, so I don't know why I'm having any problems at
all :-(
I have seen people having problems because they installed packages
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would guess
the
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:14:35PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 16:11:43 schreef Lukáš Jirkovský:
On 20 July 2012 09:27, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
could you try the same with the long lived branch of nvidia utils and
drivers?
these are
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:40:21AM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Arvid Warnecke ar...@nostalgix.org wrote:
When looking into /var/log/pm-suspend.log it seems that hibernating went
well: lots of success messages and no errors. But when I then start
On 07/20/2012 10:27 AM, D. R. Evans wrote:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would guess the
following should work:
pacman -Syu
On 07/20/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR or the
official arch repositories, so I don't know why I'm having any problems at all
:-(
I have seen people
On Jul 20, 2012 6:08 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 07/20/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR or the
official arch repositories, so I
Op 20 jul. 2012 16:21 schreef D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com het
volgende:
Guus Snijders said the following at 07/20/2012 04:13 AM :
[...]
If i understand correctly, the symlinks for /var/run and /var/lock are
there already.
Yes.
If fileystem is not yet upgraded, what might just
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 17:11:12 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:14:35PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 16:11:43 schreef Lukáš Jirkovský:
On 20 July 2012 09:27, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
could you try the same with the long
D. R. Evans [2012.07.20 0827 -0600]:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the
glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would
guess the
following should work:
Hello everybody,
I am creating live media and want to reduce size. After
removing /usr/include/ wicd fails to start because of a missing header file.
Is this expected behavior? I thought /usr/include/ is only needed for
compilation and not as runtime dependency.
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene
On 07/20/12 at 03:27pm, Norbert Zeh wrote:
I
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it seems
you haven't updated your system in a long time. So now you're running into
dealing with two slightly tricky upgrades (filesystem + glibc) at the same
time.
I've had
On 07/20/2012 12:41 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
It would also be nice to know a bit more of the rationale behind the
moves. I'm sure that they are all for the best, and I trust arch
decision-makers (and one can find out more about the changes by reading
blogs and forum discussions), but still
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:41:44PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 03:27pm, Norbert Zeh wrote:
I
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it
seems
you haven't updated your system in a long time. So now you're running into
dealing with two
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
filesystem -
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023014.html
grub -
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023147.html
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
I, for one, thought that running archlinux responsibly only committed me
to subscribing to and
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
I, for one, thought that running archlinux
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were
Hello Ike,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:27:22AM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 08:05:33 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
I have already been used to not beeing able to suspend my MacBook Pro
since the buggy nvidia version which came with 3.4.x kernel. But as of
the latest updates
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
Hello Ike,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:27:22AM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 08:05:33 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
I have already been used to not beeing able to suspend my MacBook Pro
since the buggy nvidia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:27:22AM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
could you try the same with the long lived branch of nvidia utils and
drivers?
these are at
Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 22:06:31 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:27:22AM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
could you try the same with the long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/12 07:47, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR
or the official arch repositories, so I don't know why I'm having
any
Guys,
After going though the usrlib/glibc update and creating a new archroot for
building, I am getting build failures in trinity k3b and k9copy. Both packages
built without error on 7/14 prior to my update. Following update I experience
the following:
k3b:
summary:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/20/2012 12:27 PM :
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it seems
you haven't updated your system in a long time. So now you're running into
Approximately a month, I believe. Certainly not a whole lot longer. I don't
regard
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/20/2012 12:27 PM :
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it
seems
you haven't updated your system in a long time. So now you're running into
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were
Tom Gundersen said the following at 07/20/2012 02:41 PM :
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/20/2012 12:27 PM :
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it
seems
you haven't updated your
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would guess
the
following should work:
pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem --ignore glibc
On 07/20/2012 12:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012 6:08 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 07/20/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on this system that hasn't come from either AUR
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am creating live media and want to reduce size. After
removing /usr/include/ wicd fails to start because of a missing header
file.
Do you know which one is trying to read?
If not, you could try running
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Rodrigo Rivas rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am creating live media and want to reduce size. After
removing /usr/include/ wicd fails to start because of a missing
On 07/20/12 at 10:45pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel
D. R. Evans [2012.07.20 1541 -0600]:
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/19/2012 06:08 PM :
Well, the filesystem instructions are older and applied at the time the
glibc
upgrade was not an issue yet. Combining the two instructions, I would
guess the
following should work:
Op 21 jul. 2012 01:13 schreef Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
het volgende:
OK. I'll subscribe to arch-dev-public, then. I think it would be good if
the mailing lists page at archlinux.org explained what one is to
expect from each mailing list, and maybe recommend which mailing lists
On 07/20/2012 04:45 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 07/20/2012 12:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012 6:08 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 07/20/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, D. R. Evans doc.ev...@gmail.com wrote:
There's nothing on
47 matches
Mail list logo
