Re: [arch-general] pacman reset procedure

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:37:53 -0500 Jude DaShiell wrote: > Failed to synchronize all error failed to update each database and > finally error failed to synchronize all data bases. > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, Nate DeMare via arch-general wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:23:55 > > From: Nate

Re: [arch-general] Problems with upgrading arch system do to file conflicts.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:12:39 -0400 matthew dyer via arch-general wrote: > Evening all, > > When trying to update my arch system, I get a message about files in > conflict with speech-dispatcher. Speech-dispatcher is not even listed as an > update. I have tried paceman overwrite with no

Re: [arch-general] problem upgrading old installation

On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:30:56 +0200 Łukasz Michalski wrote: > Hi, > > Any idea how can I overcome this problem: > > [root@nettest zork]# pacman -S -q --noconfirm archlinux-keyring > > downloading required keys... > > error: key "6D42BDD116E0068F" could not be looked up remotely > error:

Re: [arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:41:28 -0600 Javier via arch-general wrote: > Hi ! > > On Today's upgrade: > > % pacman -Syu > :: Synchronizing package databases... > ... > Packages (9) ... tigervnc-1.11.0-1 ... > ... > tigervnc-1.11.0-1-x86_64 131.3 MiB 3.51 MiB/s 00:37 >

Re: [arch-general] Anyone having problems refreshing PGP keys lately?

On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:21:10 -0400 matthew dyer via arch-general wrote: > Good morning all, > > I am wondering if anyone is having problems refreshing PGP keys from the > default server? I can force it to use the ipv4 server, but using > mate-terminal with orca I am unable to edit the

Re: [arch-general] pacman --assume-installed in a config file?

On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:30:24 +0200 Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote: > I often find myself using the `assume-installed`[1] option of pacman > when doing upgrades, since I want to avoid some (for me) nonsensical > dependencies to be installed. > > Is it possible to configure this in

Re: [arch-general] oops, 'sudo: pacman: command not found'

On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 18:09:12 -0700 Greg Minshall wrote: > hi. a month ago i ran out of room on my root file system, so relocated > /var/cache/pacman to /home, and left behind a symlink. > > today, after a while, i did a 'pacman -Syu', which downloaded lots, and > ran through a lot new keys,

Re: [arch-general] changing nickname on arch infrastructure

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:15:05 +0300 Alexander Epaneshnikov via arch-general wrote: > hello list, i need to change my nick on arch bug-tracker, forum and > wiki. where and to whom do I need to write? > You don't, changing usernames isn't something we do. pgpa9OfzVgI8I.pgp Description: OpenPGP

Re: [arch-general] about ecryptfs-utils, openssl supporting should be added ?

On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:42:04 +0800 Yi Zheng via arch-general wrote: > why not add '--enable-openssl' into the configure options? > > Does it support OpenSSL now? If you want the functionality, how do you not know if it supports it? What's the actual issue here?

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:17:09 +0200 Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > Robin Broda: > > This is universally stupid. > abrasiveness = blockage > LOL, blocking a TU who's making valid points. This thread was going nowhere in the first place, so I guess it doesn't matter.

Re: [arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base` package - manual intervention required

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:13:28 -0400 Jude DaShiell wrote: > One dependency that exists is netctl and dialog. You can't use wifi-menu > unless dialog is pre-installed and wifi-menu if I'm not much mistaken is a > part of netctl. > > > > -- Optional dependencies are a standard part of Arch.

Re: [arch-general] XFCE4 4.14 Missing Files?

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:07:04 -0400 Dan Sommers <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > I tried to install XFCE4 4.14 (i.e., the xfce4 and xfce4-goodies > groups) this morning, and some of the packages can't be found. > > Relevant exerpts from pacman's output: > > error:

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

On Tue, 21 May 2019 18:28:50 +0200 Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote: > > 2) Question: > >Arch typically has used unversioned initrd images which has the > >convenience that the boot standzas don't need updating on new kernel. > > > > This can (also) be fixed if Arch

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

On Tue, 21 May 2019 12:24:09 -0400 Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: > 1) Feedback: > Tested one computer and it worked fine. > Used refind to boot - it has encrytped /home but not root. > Got text prompt for passphrase not graphical - think there is a way to > get graphical as well but need

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

On Tue, 21 May 2019 17:21:31 +0200 Lone_Wolf wrote: > Seems like having dracut depending on bash may not be a good idea. > > Or is there a way to make sure dracut scripts & hooks will use bash in > POSIX-compliant mode ? > > LW Bash runs POSIX scripts just fine. No need to do anything.

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux USB stick won't boot

On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:37:18 -0600 st...@vwebr.net wrote: > My apologies, but the instructions aren't clear at all. I don't know > where in the instructions the event I'm seeing is taking place. > > I'm seeing a prompt but it's not obvious what to put there even from the > instructions. I not

Re: [arch-general] BrlTTY Hard Dependancy on eSpeak

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:25:19 -0500 "brent s." wrote: > On 2/13/19 3:16 PM, Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm having some issues with installing brltty. The problem is, it > > depends on espeak but I'm using the espeak-ng from community and it is > > giving me the

Re: [arch-general] pambase update now requires explicit service files in /etc/pam.d/ - dovecot affected

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:42:01 -0800 frede...@ofb.net wrote: > I don't understand the need for that reaction... He posted that he's glad he broke the rules, implying that he'd gladly do it again in the future. A strong reaction is not only warranted, but necessary. Scimmia

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:52:55 +0100 Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:34:12 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > >Probably I should create the folder to fix the problem. Which owner > >and access rights are needed? > > No, use /usr/lib/sysusers.d/ to declare the user. >

Re: [arch-general] Problems with shadow service

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:33:49 +0100 Andy Pieters wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:28 PM Peter Nabbefeld > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > because of a performance problem I've checked services and noticed this > > line: > > ● shadow.service > > loaded failed failed

Re: [arch-general] Add MIT Licence to /usr/share/licences/common

On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 00:24:14 +0100 mpan wrote: > > It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes > > them special that they cannot be added? > Because there is no MIT or 1/2/3-clause BSD license. There are > hundreds of independent, barely related licenses that are

Re: [arch-general] Can I prevent Pacman from running hooks?

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:44:37 -0500 Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 18:41:45 +0200 > Tobias Hunger via arch-general wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM Doug Newgard via arch-general > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 14:1

Re: [arch-general] Can I prevent Pacman from running hooks?

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 18:41:45 +0200 Tobias Hunger via arch-general wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM Doug Newgard via arch-general > wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 14:12:11 +0200 > > Tobias Hunger via arch-general wrote: > > > > > It would suffi

Re: [arch-general] Can I prevent Pacman from running hooks?

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 14:12:11 +0200 Tobias Hunger via arch-general wrote: > It would suffice to run all hooks in the leaves of the tree of systems > (just before writing the actual HDD image files) and skip them for all > others. Again, no, it wouldn't. The hooks would not run correctly.

Re: [arch-general] Can I prevent Pacman from running hooks?

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:11:10 +0200 Tobias Hunger via arch-general wrote: > Hi Arch Community, > > I have scripts that will install a set of arch linux machines for me > with all the tweaks I want. These scripts run pacman a lot to install > bits and pieces. Usually the script will running

Re: [arch-general] How to have multiple JDKs parallel?

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 18:20:49 +0200 Guillaume ALAUX via arch-general wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:48 PM Carsten Mattner via arch-general > wrote: > > > > On 9/17/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general > > wrote: > > > > > So essentially what you really want is a way for pacman to remember

Re: [arch-general] Antergoes problem.

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:46:41 -0400 Matthew Dyer via arch-general wrote: > Hi all, > > > Just installed antergoes which is an arch diribitive distro.  Any how I > have yaourt  Enabled to install packages from the AUR.  When I attempted > to install or update packages with yaourt I get command

Re: [arch-general] libjson-c.so.3 problem

On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 16:33:37 +0100 niya via arch-general wrote: > hi everyone > > i have downloaded and installed bind and bind-tools version 9.11.2, > named.conf is configured, > when i enable and start named i get the following error > - > /usr/bin/named: error while loading shared

Re: [arch-general] Kernel modules not loaded after Linux update

On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:27:04 +0200 Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Hello, > > I've updated my installation yesterday, also doing an update of the > Linux kernel to 4.17.8. When starting this morning, kernel modules > rejected to load, so I even couldn't access the internet. > > I've downgraded

Re: [arch-general] nvidia-lts version

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:21:18 +0200 Hering wrote: > Hello, > is there a reason why the current nvidia-lts version is 396.24 but when > checking https://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html it says it should be > 390.67? > I am asking because the current nvidia-driver is causing problems with > Unity

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 163, Issue 29

On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:44:33 + Candy Adkins via arch-general wrote: > Please remove me from this list I didn't ask for your emails > > Candy > Somebody with access to your account did. This email won't do anything, either, follow the instructions provided in your original email

Re: [arch-general] libsecret dependency error

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 20:43:48 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:34:09 -0400, beest wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:11:44PM -0400, Trey Sizemore via > >arch-general wrote: > >> I've recently been getting the following errors for the libsecret > >>

Re: [arch-general] deluge post-install

On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:29:07 -0400 Jude DaShiell wrote: > Interesting pip and pip3 found nothing. pypi though found a bunch of > packages. Now I need to learn how to use pypi since when I did a search > with the package I got into an unfamiliar interface and further with

Re: [arch-general] Re-install of Arch on a larger drive

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:46:21 +0100 Ralf Mardorf <silver.bul...@zoho.com> wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 11:33:19 -0500, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > >On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:30:27 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> The "dd" command is inappropriate

Re: [arch-general] Re-install of Arch on a larger drive

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:30:27 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:51:53 +0100, Ricardo Band via arch-general wrote: > >On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 17:25 -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote: > >> Hi all- > >> > >> I currently have Arch running on a 250GB drive, and I'm

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 17:56:52 +0100 Alajos Odoyle wrote: > On 2018-03-02 13:07, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: > > > > That's literally an incredibly stupid idea. Symlink /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.5 > > to /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.6 does not magically make it compatible

Re: [arch-general] Intel microcode - latest version not loading

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:43:26 -0600 Dutch Ingraham <s...@gmx.us> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:50:09AM -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > > You're looking at the dates that the last *bundle* was released. That says > > nothing about what firmware is availab

Re: [arch-general] Intel microcode - latest version not loading

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:46:23 -0600 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Hi all: > > I'm having an issue with Intel microcode loading. Specifically, the microcode > does not appear to be loading the latest version: > > ~ $ dmesg | grep microcode > [0.00] microcode: microcode updated

Re: [arch-general] lftp bug

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:12:02 -0500 Jude DaShiell wrote: > I don't know which is responsible for what. > I put together an lftp script and tried running the script to download a > torrent and am getting strange output. > > Script started on 2018-02-07 10:35:38-0500 >

Re: [arch-general] Corrupt Package (confirmed 2 servers) dovecot, jansson, python2-pillow

On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 16:22:04 -0600 "David C. Rankin" <drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > On 02/11/2018 07:09 AM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > >> I refreshed the keylist with pacman-key no help, I finally just tagged > >> TrustAll a

Re: [arch-general] Corrupt Package (confirmed 2 servers) dovecot, jansson, python2-pillow

On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 06:33:56 -0600 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > On 02/11/2018 04:42 AM, Simon Doppler wrote: > > The error means that your pacman keyring knows Eli's key but has no > > trustlevel > > associated to it (have you tried refreshing the keys or

Re: [arch-general] libxfont: removing fontsproto breaks dependency 'fontsproto>=2.1.3'

On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 21:54:10 -0600 "David C. Rankin" <drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > On 02/09/2018 09:49 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > > It no longer exists in the repos. You have nothing depending on it. It's > > causing you probl

Re: [arch-general] libxfont: removing fontsproto breaks dependency 'fontsproto>=2.1.3'

On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 21:46:43 -0600 "David C. Rankin" <drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > On 02/09/2018 09:17 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:53:01 -0600 > > "David C. Rankin" <drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com>

Re: [arch-general] libxfont: removing fontsproto breaks dependency 'fontsproto>=2.1.3'

On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:53:01 -0600 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > All, > > Attempting to upgrade tonight I am met with a fontsproto breaks dependency > 'fontsproto>=2.1.3' error and pacman quits. Is this a repo-sync issue or is > this a bug? > It's neither. Why

Re: [arch-general] Proposal: add "--disable-modern-top" to procps-ng configure flags

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:55:51 -0600 Doug Newgard via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:31:21 + > Jonathon Fernyhough <jonat...@manjaro.org> wrote: > > > If anyone is willing to help me contribute in a way that isn't viewed

Re: [arch-general] Proposal: add "--disable-modern-top" to procps-ng configure flags

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:31:21 + Jonathon Fernyhough wrote: > If anyone is willing to help me contribute in a way that isn't viewed as > "complaining" please point me in the right direction. And now you're asking how to complain without it being viewed as complaining. The

Re: [arch-general] Proposal: add "--disable-modern-top" to procps-ng configure flags

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:39:46 + Jonathon Fernyhough wrote: > The "modern" default interface: > > * requires user configuration to make usable; Completely subjective > * uses low-contrast text; So? This is personal preference > * is not consistent with other distros;

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Switching the bugtracker to Bugzilla

On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 17:58:55 +0100 William Gathoye wrote: > This is why at The Document Foundation and Mattermost, we have a QA team > (or at least one or two persons) which checks if the bugs are valid and > put in cc the people that have the abilities to work on it. I know

Re: [arch-general] Problem updating Fenrir from AUR.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:20:12 -0400 matthew dyer via arch-general wrote: > Hi all. > > Yesterday, I notesed that Fenrir got a miner update in the AUER and when > trying to update, I receive a message force settings could not be reconnized > or something to the

Re: [arch-general] Contributions to the wiki - Are user contributions a thing of the past?

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:54:35 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > The latest being a small addition to the multilib page to make clear that > following repo addition and update you need to explicitly install the wanted > multilib packages. Following the directions

Re: [arch-general] Can someone update lib32-p11-kit?

On Wed, 10 May 2017 15:33:59 -0400 DR via arch-general wrote: > It's breaking 32bit chrome and other stuffs. > > Regards. There is no 32 bit Chrome anymore. What "other stuffs"?

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

On Mon, 8 May 2017 13:15:31 -0600 Leonid Isaev wrote: > I don't understand... testing/libx264 contains /usr/include/x264.h and doesn't > depend on ffmpeg, no? > > Cheers, There's been another reshuffle of the x264 packages. The "lib" packages were just symlinks

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

On Sun, 7 May 2017 18:05:16 + Carsten Mattner via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Doug Newgard <scim...@archlinux.info> wrote: > > So what? None of that should cause a problem if your custom > > ffmpeg package is do

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

On Sun, 7 May 2017 16:36:43 + Carsten Mattner via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Doug Newgard <scim...@archlinux.info> wrote: > > On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:51:08 + > > Carsten Mattner via arch-general <arc

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:51:08 + Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > For various reasons like missing features and wrong version > I cannot use arch's ffmpeg package and have to build my own > package, and this results in a cyclic dependency I cannot > get out

Re: [arch-general] Removing gitolite package doesn't remove gitolite user

On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 03:01:04 +0200 Ricardo Band wrote: > I think this is a bug. When gitolite is uninstalled it should also > remove the gitolite user. No, it shouldn't. A deleted user presents a security issue, since the package has no way of knowing if there's any

Re: [arch-general] Update to Linux 4.10.1-1 Broke Bind9 /etc/named.conf never reached on startup

On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:36:48 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > Should I open a bug, and if so, which package do I open it under? There already is one, has been for a couple of days

Re: [arch-general] hcidump is missing?

On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:19:33 + Алексей Трофимов via arch-general wrote: > I try to dump bluetooth traffic to find audio codecs my wireless headphones > support -- > http://askubuntu.com/questions/425333/how-to-make-aptx-capable-bluetooth-equipment-work-with-ubuntu

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:48:14 +0100 Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Thank You, I'll try that! > > Regards > P. You do realize that firefox is now built with alsa support in the repos, right?

Re: [arch-general] Arch Nim package

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0500 Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 03/07/2017 12:01 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: > > On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> the Nim package:

Re: [arch-general] user namespaces

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:13:46 +0100 sivmu wrote: > Am 02.02.2017 um 05:10 schrieb Maxwell Anselm via arch-general: > >> > >> All those distros, everyone except arch has decided at some point to no > >> longer restrict the use of unprivileged user namespaces. > >> > > > > In no way

Re: [arch-general] STM32 compilation on ArchLinuxARM

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:18:44 + Konstantin Gribov via arch-general wrote: > > > > RPi 2 B is Armv7. IIRC. > > Idk about 3, But I think it is ArmV7 > > RPi3 is armv8-a (it has Cortex-A53 cores), not armv7-a. But it's offtopic. > > OP's question was about

Re: [arch-general] Getting freeze on early start with linux 4.9-1 kernel.

On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 21:54:32 -0500 Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > The blatantly obvious way would be with a dummy kernel package > containing a symlink to the vmlinuz/initramfs of the latest versioned > package. Old bootloader configurations don't care about

Re: [arch-general] Whatever happened to speps?

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:52:45 + (UTC) Antonio Rojas wrote: > CC'ing speps. If he doesn't give signs of life and nobody else adopts the > packages in two weeks, I'll drop them to AUR. > He's been almost totally MIA, no commits since March 25th until Dec 10th.

Re: [arch-general] Why was wpa_supplicant.conf renamed wpa_supplicant.conf.pacsav??

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:25:00 -0600 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > Here, anyone relying on remote access via wpa_supplicant is left dead in the > water unless they catch the comment as it scrolls by before rebooting. (yes > they should review the comments, but with

Re: [arch-general] Systemd services start by default

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:56:25 +0100 sivmu wrote: > Today I noticed there were network services running on my system. > I DON'T have have permanently running network services. > WTF happened? Systemd happened! > Or rather systemd-resolved and the systemd time sync daemon. > > It

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 00:30:43 + (GMT) piequiex wrote: > > Whatever you expected to happen. I'm going to go through a few things > The logical conclusion. Logical conclusion: It crashed. What more do you want us to say? We're not kernel devs.

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:25:57 + (GMT) piequiex wrote: > > Have a nice day! > > > > > > You too! > Useless message. > P.S. Adjust MUA setings. Just as useless as you original message. pgpX_4Ngnv0my.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Does LTS package really not fit to Rolling Release model and Arch Philosophy?

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:34:08 +0900 Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote: > What kind of scenario in the real world to be problematic to maintain > KDE Plasma LTS line as separated packages from non-LTS? A whole lot more work for litte/no gain. The kernel is a different,

Re: [arch-general] espeak ng and keeping packages in the aur up todate.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:41:11 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote: > That message I sent was not intended for arch-general at all, sorry > about the basic stuff coming up on this list. Please don't top post. If it was not intended for arch-general, I assume it was intended to

Re: [arch-general] espeak ng and keeping packages in the aur up todate.

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:24:58 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote: > Did you ever download a package from aur before? If not you can get and > set up yaourt on archlinux but some edits have to be done to > /etc/pacman.conf and then you need to run two pacman commands to first

Re: [arch-general] systemd-boot ignores loader.conf

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:25:45 +0100 Tung Anh Vu via arch-general wrote: > I managed to make the boot menu screen not appear by holding the minus key > down to 0 second timeout in the boot menu itself. > Thanks everyone, especially David Thurstenson. > > PS: I still

Re: [arch-general] Problem with "geoclue2" update

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 18:10:34 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > # pacman -S --force geoclue2 DO NOT FORCE THIS. Please don't recommend force if you don't know what it's going to do.

Re: [arch-general] Problem with "geoclue2" update

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:52:50 +0100 Manuel Reimer wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently trying to update my system, but this fails with the > following messages: > > geoclue2: /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/geoclue/geoclue.devhelp2 exists in > filesystem > geoclue2:

Re: [arch-general] kernel linux-4.8.6-1-x86_64 not able to load modules

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 14:50:30 +0200 Anast Gramm via arch-general wrote: > Hey list, > > After, as suggested in arch-annoucne, I force-upgrated ttf-dejavu > I made a full system upgrade with pacman -Syu. > > This installed the latest linux kernel. (the one in the

Re: [arch-general] Single Drive Fresh Install (mbr/grub2) Fails to boot (can boot existing from .iso??)

On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 06:24:52 -0500 kendell clark via arch-general wrote: > I do get past the grub screen Meaning it's not the same issue at all. Don't hijack threads.

Re: [arch-general] Implement sql/sqlite database for pacman local database

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:53:20 + Alive 4ever wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:03:53PM +0200, Tinu Weber wrote: > Currently, pacman package includes a ``pacman-optimize`` script to do > manual periodic local database optimization. Not for long.

Re: [arch-general] Microsoft Signature PC Requirements Now Blocks Linux Installation

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:24:25 -0400 Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote: > https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/16/09/21/1516230/microsoft-signature-pc- > requirements-now-blocks-linux-installation-reports?sbsrc=md > > It was nice while it lasted. > > They don't

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: [arch-dev-public] i686 and SSE2

On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:24:32 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > ...IMO we could assume that > FreeBSD users are a similar target group as Arch users. If so, then it > could cause a lot of pain for Arch users and maintainers, too. > > Regards, > Ralf I wouldn't assume that.

Re: [arch-general] Arch GNU/Linux install for beginners and new users

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:31:47 -0400 Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote: > For beginners and new users, here is how to install Arch GNU/Linux, without > the agony: > > 1) http://sourceforge.net/projects/architect-linux > > 2) http://arch-anywhere.org > > And

Re: [arch-general] What happened to the Beginner's Guide?

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:01:55 -0400 Dave via arch-general wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Jason Ryan via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > On 21/09/16 at 08:36pm, Dave via arch-general wrote > > This will only alienate new users that

Re: [arch-general] .xsession-errors - can't startx with that file

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:47:57 -0500 Dutch Ingraham <s...@gmx.us> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:23:01AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:11:45 -0500 > > Dutch Ingraham <s...@gmx.us> wrote: > > > > > Hello all: > >

Re: [arch-general] .xsession-errors - can't startx with that file

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:11:45 -0500 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Hello all: > > TL;DR: One Arch installation will allow redirecting startx's stderr to > a file, one won't. What is the difference between systems? > Is X running as root or as the user (rootless)? This can change based

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] i686 and SSE2

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:50:09 +0200 Jayesh Badwaik wrote: > On Saturday, 17 September 2016 15:10:48 CEST LoneVVolf wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 21:44 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > > > Actually, why don't raise the bar higher? SSE2 has been introduced in

Re: [arch-general] Package versioning

On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:03:50 +0200 Magnus Therning <mag...@therning.org> wrote: > Doug Newgard <scim...@archlinux.info> writes: > > Sounds like .x would make more sense. > > Yes, it looks like it would work better. Is there some description of > what the prese

Re: [arch-general] Package versioning

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 23:39:59 +0100 João Miguel via arch-general wrote: > A 2016-09-01T23:57:07 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu: > > > > When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version > > numbers that I'm looking for a solution to. > > > >

Re: [arch-general] Package versioning

On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 23:57:07 +0200 Magnus Therning wrote: > When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version > numbers that I'm looking for a solution to. > > Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the > upstream developer) and

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300 Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: > Hello, > > I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying > to contact the maintainer about it, with no response. > >

Re: [arch-general] interested in becoming a TU

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:21:29 -0400 Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote: > Howdy, > I am interested in becoming a TU. I have several packages in the AUR, > including magic-wormhole{,-git}, rndsig, libsonic-git, rsgames, etc. > My main area of interested, in

Re: [arch-general] about mrelendig's, scimmia's, and dreisner's behavior

On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:18:01 +0300 Alex Theotokatos via arch-general wrote: > On 08/11/2016 09:06 AM, fnodeuser wrote: > > jason, spare us the bullshit. go back to the forum to ban some more people. > > you are not here to make anything better. > > > > this is not

Re: [arch-general] community/go-tools godoc

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:03:19 -0400 David N Murray via arch-general wrote: > Greetings, > > I think I have two problems. The first is a simple packaging question. > I have been using Go (community/go and go-tools, version 2:1.6.3-1 is > currently installed and

Re: [arch-general] recent archlinux installation

On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:36:27 -0700 jordan via arch-general wrote: > Jesus fuck. I unsubscribed why am I still getting these God damn emails? If > I keep getting spammed, I'm going to spam back > Except that you haven't bothered to actually read the instructions on

Re: [arch-general] Enable translations in transmission-qt

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:14:17 -0500 Doug Newgard <scim...@archlinux.info> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 02:01:59 +0300 > Alexey Rochev via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > I emailed package maintainers directly, but they did not respond. > >

Re: [arch-general] Enable translations in transmission-qt

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 02:01:59 +0300 Alexey Rochev via arch-general wrote: > I emailed package maintainers directly, but they did not respond. > Could anyone please tell me who is responsible for "transmission" > packages? > > 2016-06-07 23:46 GMT+03:00, Alexey Rochev

Re: [arch-general] Possible reflector https problem?

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:37:29 -0400 Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote: > Hi. > > I just did: > > sudo reflector --verbose --country 'United States' -l 200 -p https --sort > rate --save /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist > > The result, only one source (has been 5 or 6

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD - Howto build openmpi w/o valgrind or valgrind w/o openmpi - what's the trick?

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:56:14 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > All, > > This seems like a chicken-and-the-egg problem that I'm not understanding. > How > do you build openmpi when it's makedepends requires valgrind, but you cannot > build valgrind because it's

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:13:51 +0100 Mauro Santos wrote: > On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > > Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build > > modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub update at the > >

Re: [arch-general] netcdf problem after arch update

On Wed, 11 May 2016 21:21:18 +0300 Ilya Boka wrote: > Of course you can downgrade package if you want. > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/downgrading_packages > Sure, breaking everything else that's using netcdf.

Re: [arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:40:29 +0930 Stephen wrote: > I'm sorry, but my mail client (mutt) certainly does show these as > being threaded under, and not top level replies. I don't know why it > would be showing up otherwise for you, because I've replied direct to > yours each

Re: [arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:47:16 +0930 Stephen wrote: > Appreciate the clarification - I was not aware that this was the case, > but it does make sense. Is this true of fetching updates as well, or > only in terms of rebuilding things? Thanks! Please stop top posting. Yes, it

  1   2   3   >