On 27-08-2017 17:28, Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote:
> I am using an Odroid XU4 with which is an ARM machine. So it uses uboot.
> I did uncomment a larger screen setting in the boot.txt file and did
> mkscr to compile it. Here is the line from boot.txt:
You are using Arch Linux ARM, which is
On 22-06-2017 15:20, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> Unfortunately that's not enough, other hooks (which are unknown) can
> update the initramfs, and I can't hook on /boot/initramfs-* since it's
> not part of any package.
I suppose the question is if any of the official packages provide a hook
that do
On 22-06-2017 12:58, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote:
> Is there any plan for moving ArchLinux to the kernel-install infrastructure[1]
>
> I've seen some talk about it from a year ago, but the discussion seems
> to have died off.
>
> My personal use case is to have a hook that self-sign
On 21-06-2017 19:51, Alan E. Davis via arch-general wrote:
> For the NVMe drive, I see that it is *up to* 3.2 GB/s, or 3200MB/s, and
> this may be "up-to" that speed..
You should always be aware of the up to claims but it should be
achievable, even if it is only for large sequential reads.
Anothe
On 21-06-2017 20:16, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 03:07 PM, Bjoern Franke wrote:
>> Am 21.06.2017 um 14:17 schrieb David Barri via arch-general:
>>> Broke for me recently too. I had to add this to my .xinitrc:
>>>
>>> systemctl --user start xfce4-notifyd.service
>>>
>>
>> Which DE are
On 20-04-2017 23:37, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> Bug has been reported in Arch's tracker and there's a companion
> bug from someone else about ffmpeg2.8. It makes sense to report
> in Arch first because arch has published 3.3 in testing and maybe
> ffmpeg's version scheme is just convoluted and 3.3 is
On 20-04-2017 20:21, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Have you reported the bug? If yes and the dev decides that it should be
>> reverted to a previous version there is a way to do it, see:
>> man pacman | grep -A1 epoch
>
> For the sake of completeness:
>
> "Upstream or Arch?
> [snip]
> If Arch is not res
On 20-04-2017 18:56, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> If I may suggest a pain point: arch needs good support for
> revoking packages and replacing with the previous version
> if regressions are encountered. Case in point ffmpeg 3.3.
> 3.2.4 was fine and 2.8.11 is also fine but 3.3's muxer
On 12-03-2017 14:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> After update to Linux 4.10.1-1, Bind9 cannot connect to 127.0.0.1#953. This
> server has been flawless with Bind for 4 years. Now, for example attempting to
> sync zones:
It seems other people also have noticed problems:
https://bbs.archli
On 06-03-2017 12:45, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote:
> 2017-03-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>
>> On 06-03-2017 11:20, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote:
>>> 2017-03-06 11:18 GMT+01:00 Ralf Ma
On 06-03-2017 12:13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:53:34 +0000, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
>> I think the point here is not so much privacy, as I believe everyone
>> recognizes that the information that was asked for (the full list of
>> usernames) is
On 06-03-2017 11:20, Henrik Danielsson via arch-general wrote:
> 2017-03-06 11:18 GMT+01:00 Ralf Mardorf :
>>
>> Privacy is a principle. You seem not to understand the difference
>> between giving somebody data with the formal permission to use this data
>> and data that simply is available for eve
On 05-03-2017 13:35, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was recently contacted by a Polish researcher asking for a list of AUR
> account names. I did not expect this to be controversial but a couple of
> Trusted Users raised concerns on IRC, so I decided to move this to the
> public mailing list a
On 09-01-2017 15:39, Alexander Rath wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091
>
> Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition?
On 26-12-2016 02:54, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 12/24/2016 10:33 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
>> What other distros do is recommend a 1GB /boot or changing the
>> configuration to reduce the number of older kernels installed[1]. People
>> have c
On 24-12-2016 14:14, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Mauro Santos via arch-general
> wrote:
>> On 23-12-2016 13:58, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:59 PM, fredbezies via arch-general
>>> wrote:
>&
On 23-12-2016 13:58, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:59 PM, fredbezies via arch-general
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm facing an annoying bug with linux 4.9-1 kernel on my 6 or 7 years
>> old Toshiba Laptop. When I try to make it boot on with linux 4.9-1
>> kernel
On 29-11-2016 17:00, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em novembro 29, 2016 14:38 Christian Hesse escreveu:
>>
>> We need root privileges at initialization phase, no? Privileges are
>> dropped
>> to nobody/nobody when initialization sequence completed.
>>
>> If we can make things work with non-root syst
On 10-10-2016 23:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 03:26 PM, LoneVVolf wrote:
>> Check these 2 options in the AMI Bios :
>>
>> Advanced Chipset Control > Northbridge
>> Set IOMMU MODE to 1 GB
>> (unless you have an agp videocard in this system, then it should be set to
>> "AGP
>> present"
On 09-10-2016 18:38, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been told that I cannot bridge multiple networks using WLAN (as WDS
> would not have been implemented correctly on all devices), but I've to
> use a virtual network, brobably with NAT, but I cannot find sufficient
> advice, neither i
On 23-09-2016 01:06, Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote:
> Hi Maurio,
>
> Thank you for your opinion. In regard to your postulate, if my freedom
> ends where the others starts, then it would seem that the reverse is also
> true, that the freedom of others ends where my freedom starts.
>
Yes
On 22-09-2016 23:10, Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote:
> Hi D C,
>
> Freedom of speech means being able to say whatever you want to say, without
> interference from sel-appointed sidewalk supervisors or other members of
> the Peanut Gallery.
>
> HTH.
> .
>
All nice and well, but don't forg
On 22-09-2016 17:26, Zachary Kline wrote:
>
> How does one define “third-party installer?” By my reading, the TalkingArch
> project, which makes the installation process accessible to the visually
> impaired, could qualify, as it isn’t released by the official Arch
> maintainers. This would be
On 22-09-2016 16:47, Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote:
> Note that all of these are regarded as separate distros and will NOT be
>> supported by Arch in the forums, mailing lists, or IRC.
>>
>
>
> While Antergos is indeed a separate distribution (but very close to raw
> Arch), the Archtect A
Have you tried with the latest install ISO?
You also seem to have physical access to the hardware, any special
reason why you have to use optical media instead of a usb flash drive?
--
Mauro Santos
I'm not sure enforcing sse3 or later for AMD64 hardware is the best
course of action.
> egrep "^model name|^flags" /proc/cpuinfo
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 s
On 19-08-2016 16:05, Sebastiaan Lokhorst via arch-general wrote:
> 2016-08-19 16:28 GMT+02:00 Mauro Santos via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>>
>> Make no mistake, they are after profits and do whatever it takes to keep
>> the money flowing
>>
P Fingerprint <https://leefuller.io/pgp/>: *
> 4ACAEBA4B9EE1B3A075034302D5C3D050E6ED55A
>
> On 19 August 2016 at 15:28, Mauro Santos via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> On 19-08-2016 14:27, Stephen E. Baker via arch-general wrote:
>>
On 19-08-2016 14:27, Stephen E. Baker via arch-general wrote:
> As a PowerShell user, it certainly has it's place, but it's place is
> pretty niche in the linux world, so +1 for the AUR.
Given that it comes from Microsoft they must have some agenda to
fulfill, I'd rather not touch this even with a
On 10-07-2016 13:18, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 07/10/2016 01:59 PM, LoneVVolf wrote:
>> My personal preference though is for AL community to treat flatpak
>> similar as derivative distros.
>>
>> something like : flatpak is unsupported on Arch linux, ask the flatpak
>> creat
On 23-06-2016 15:04, Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> so Archlinux has packer[0] that provides an executable named `packer` and
> now there is packer-io[1] that changes the upstream executable from
> `packer` to `packer-io`.
>
> Now i have a Makefile that runs packer-io[1]
On 21-06-2016 18:28, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
> I was'nt aware of keepassx2 until you mentionned it, but it appears
> unable to import my keepassx db. So yay, thanks for keeping the legacy
> keepassx…
I was also unaware of keepassx2 but for me it seems to have imported my
"old" database witho
On 17-06-2016 06:52, Javier Vasquez via arch-general wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Kyle Terrien wrote:
>>> Javier Vasquez via arch-general wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/xf86-input-synaptics.install?h=packages/xf86-input-synaptics
>>
33 matches
Mail list logo
