I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on new
installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons for Arch
making systemd the default going forward? The systemd wiki page gives a
lot of
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
for Arch making systemd the default going
On 10/16/2012 11:40 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
for
Am 16.10.2012 17:40, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
On 10/16/2012 05:28 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 17:40, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations
5 matches
Mail list logo