Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2010-04-07 03:06:50 +0200:
On 07/04/10 10:21, Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-04-07 00:46:09 +0200:
It seems like Arch is currently offering Jack and qjackctl
packages that are not compatible.
The Jack authors changed one some
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:21:20AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-04-07 00:46:09 +0200:
It seems like Arch is currently offering Jack and qjackctl
packages that are not compatible.
The Jack authors changed one some command line options
in 0.118. '-R' for
On 7 April 2010 17:24, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:21:20AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-04-07 00:46:09 +0200:
It seems like Arch is currently offering Jack and qjackctl
packages that are not compatible.
The Jack authors changed
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:49:10AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 30.03.2010 03:36, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
I created a rebuld list for the just released openssl 1.0.0 (Thanks Dan
for fixing the todo list that fast!). These are 236 packages for each
architecture; so this will need some
On 07.04.2010 06:42, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
I just tested what happens if I change pacman depends to
'libarchive=2.8.3-3' 'libfetch=2.30-3'.
Maybe start using sodeps to generate those dependencies? libfetch
(doesn't have a soname with version btw) would depend on the new openssl
libs and pacman
On 07/04/10 23:47, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 07.04.2010 06:42, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
I just tested what happens if I change pacman depends to
'libarchive=2.8.3-3' 'libfetch=2.30-3'.
Maybe start using sodeps to generate those dependencies? libfetch
(doesn't have a soname with version btw) would
I upgraded my extremely not-up-to-date server last night (523 packages
upgraded). The upgrade generally went well, except for one significant
issue: the keyboard is no longer working under Xorg. It works fine in
a command line tty though (i.e., ctrl-alt-F1).
Not sure what the problem is,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:32 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net wrote:
I upgraded my extremely not-up-to-date server last night (523 packages
upgraded). The upgrade generally went well, except for one significant
issue: the keyboard is no longer working under Xorg. It works fine in a
On 07.04.2010 16:10, Allan McRae wrote:
This would really not help here. Pacman does not directly link openssl,
but does through libarchive and libfetch. Adding versioned libarchive
and libfetch to pacman's deps and using sodeps on openssl in those
packages would prevent pacman's
On 04/07/2010 10:46 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
Can you attach full Xorg log and config ?
I'm not using any xorg config. Log is at:
http://www.darose.net/Xorg.0.log
And does it work with xf86-input-keyboard driver ?
I have xf86-input-keyboard installed. I assumed X was just
automatically
On 08/04/10 00:54, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 07.04.2010 16:10, Allan McRae wrote:
This would really not help here. Pacman does not directly link openssl,
but does through libarchive and libfetch. Adding versioned libarchive
and libfetch to pacman's deps and using sodeps on openssl in those
On 04/07/2010 09:55 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 04/07/2010 10:46 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
Can you attach full Xorg log and config ?
I'm not using any xorg config. Log is at:
http://www.darose.net/Xorg.0.log
And does it work with xf86-input-keyboard driver ?
I have
On 04/03/2010 04:59 PM, Keith Hinton wrote:
Hi,
First of all, if anyone is curious as to why I have posted to the
Arch-General mailing list, I'm mainly doing this, in case any of the
Arch Release team is actually hanging out on this list.
I was curious, seeing as the last Arch Linux release
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:44:22 -0500, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
... It doesn't matter whether you use
the
latest install set or the one from 3 'releases' back, after the first
update,
you will have the exact same, current Arch Linux we all have.
It's not entirely
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:35 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On the same note, after the latest Xorg update, X (nVidia card) was failing to
start on the same xorg.conf I had used with my arch box since I first
installed
arch.
Add a ServerFlags section to your
On 04/07/2010 10:55 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 04/07/2010 10:46 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
Can you attach full Xorg log and config ?
I'm not using any xorg config. Log is at:
http://www.darose.net/Xorg.0.log
And does it work with xf86-input-keyboard driver ?
I have
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net wrote:
Anybody have any ideas on this? GUI is completely unusable on the server
until I solve this! :-(
I really have zero idea what's going on. And it's a difficult thing to find
good specific search terms for, as
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:35 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On 04/07/2010 09:55 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 04/07/2010 10:46 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
Can you attach full Xorg log and config ?
I'm not using any xorg config. Log is at:
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 20:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:35 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On the same note, after the latest Xorg update, X (nVidia card) was failing
to
start on the same xorg.conf I had used with my arch box since I
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 12:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
( if the other distros were 1/2 as smart as Arch, they would all be using a
rolling-release model... )
Not true. If you want a distro that just works, you need to really
test a lot before you change a version of the package and
(p.s. this is 'in addition to' and not 'in lieu of' the current topic)
This is a complete thread hijacking, has nothing to do with the
current topic, and adds NOTHING to it.
darose updated to the Xserver in EXTRA which is 1.7.5.902-1
nvidia works fine in extra, even in testing !
It
On 04/07/2010 12:56 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
Add a ServerFlags section to your xorg.conf and inside that insert:
Option IgnoreABI True
When a new driver is released that recognizes the new xorg-server
version, you can remove that.
Thank you Evangelos.
Hopefully DR's issue will be
On 04/07/2010 12:51 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
It's not entirely true. You always should install using the latest iso and
it is also important to release new isos regularly. Due to our continuous
updates and changes old isos and especially netinstall are broken. For
example you cannot run a
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:45:41 -0500, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
I missed that completely in my train of thought. But without the change
in
package compression it would still hold true. Prior to the xz
compression
change, I had had no problems using the 2/09
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:51:54PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:44:22 -0500, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
... It doesn't matter whether you use
the
latest install set or the one from 3 'releases' back, after the first
update,
you will
Hi David,
It doesn't matter whether you use the
latest install set or the one from 3 'releases' back, after the first update,
you will have the exact same, current Arch Linux we all have. It is the
smartest
way to do a Linux distribution -- hands down.
I don't agree with you. For 99 % (just
26 matches
Mail list logo
