Hi all,
I've been playing with systemd for a few hours now and I must say I'm
impressed,
it's a very powerful tool. I want to thanks the devs for making the
transition to it
really smooth :)
Now, as I'm still learning my way through it -that means I'm reading a
lot!- I find that
there are in my
Am 16.10.2012 09:25, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
1. Units with errors shown in systemctl --all:
arch-modules-load.serviceerror inactive
dead arch-modules
auditd.service error inactive
dead auditd.servi
Am 16.10.2012 03:56, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.orgwrote:
[2012-10-15 22:25:58 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
Basically I need to know how to handle these daemons:
hwclock
Ditch it. Use NTP instead:
I think systemd does hwclock
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Am 16.10.2012 03:56, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org
wrote:
[2012-10-15 22:25:58 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
Basically I need to know how to handle
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 03:56, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.orgwrote:
[2012-10-15 22:25:58 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
Basically I need to know how to handle these daemons:
On 10/16/12, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
4. Is there any place for e4rat(lite)?
Since I activated systemd's built-in ureadahead feature, will e4rat still
add any improve-
ment? What do you say?
I would suggest that you benchmark this for yourself. I found pretty
good results
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
I have unset MAILCHECK in .bashrc, but no effect.
I set MAIL_CHECK_ENAB to no in login.defs, but still no effect.
Lastly i tried creating a .hushlogin file in the user's home, but even
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really
want wireless support installed by default.
Not that I install many systems, once installed... But I for one would
appreciate having wireless
Here is what I uncommented in /etc/locale.gen:
bg_BG CP1251
/etc/vconsole.conf:
KEYMAP=bg-cp1251
FONT=Cyr_a8x16
FONT_MAP=cp1251
/etc/locale.conf:
LANG=bg_BG.CP1251
LC_COLLATE=C
LC_TIME=bg_BG.CP1251
I ran locale-gen and locale -a as root. And after these steps I have
readable cyrillic
I found some kind of ugly workaround, by putting
setfont Cyr_a8x16 -m cp1251
in ~/.bashrc ; however the question why systemd-vconsole-setup does not
affect the rest of the ttys at startup still remains...
--
View this message in context:
Am 16.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Joakim Hernberg:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really
want wireless support installed by default.
Not that I install many systems, once installed...
2012/10/16 gt static.vor...@gmx.com:
Any idea what's causing it to show up?
Well, you could always try brute force method. Login and run this as root:
strace -vft -p $TARGET_GETTY_PID -o /tmp/strace-getty
Now login in straced terminal, logout and grep for New mail in
/tmp/strace-getty. You
On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt static.vor...@gmx.com wrote:
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or not. In
/etc/pam.d/system-login, comment this line:
session
I have started getting kernel oops yesterday. This started after
fully updated testing repo and switch to systemd over last weekend. I'm
running kde.
Bug is filed as shown below with screenshot which I managed to
capture of the OOPS from today's crash.
Laptop is sandy bridge i7
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on new
installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons for Arch
making systemd the default going forward? The systemd wiki page gives a
lot of
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
for Arch making systemd the default going
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:22:05 +0200
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Joakim Hernberg:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really
want wireless
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:33:53AM -0400, Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt static.vor...@gmx.com wrote:
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:24:37PM +0200, Krzysztof Warzecha wrote:
2012/10/16 gt static.vor...@gmx.com:
Any idea what's causing it to show up?
Well, you could always try brute force method. Login and run this as root:
strace -vft -p $TARGET_GETTY_PID -o /tmp/strace-getty
Now login in
On 10/16/2012 11:40 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
for
On 10/16/2012 10:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
...
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32014
Attachments worked this time ... sorry for noise on that.
gene/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Sébastien Leblanc
leblancse...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt static.vor...@gmx.com wrote:
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
Pam is taking care of showing whether you have
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Joshua Collins jeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/16/12, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
4. Is there any place for e4rat(lite)?
Since I activated systemd's built-in ureadahead feature, will e4rat still
add any improve-
ment? What do you say?
I
Am 16.10.2012 20:15, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
Interesting, but I don't know. This may be a polkit setting. If you find
out, I'd be interested.
I was sugested in the #systemd channel that this may be associated with
dbus:
06:31:17 Mithrandir | sounds like the dbus config isn't restrictive
Am 16.10.2012 17:40, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
On 10/16/2012 05:28 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 17:40, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent systemd is now the default on
new installations
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:08:33 +0200
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 20:15, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
Interesting, but I don't know. This may be a polkit setting. If you find
out, I'd be interested.
I was sugested in the #systemd channel that this may be
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:58 PM, jambov jamb...@yahoo.com wrote:
I found some kind of ugly workaround, by putting
setfont Cyr_a8x16 -m cp1251
in ~/.bashrc ; however the question why systemd-vconsole-setup does not
affect the rest of the ttys at startup still remains...
Probably what happens
[2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev:
I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default network backend in
arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :) I don't think that
wpa_supplicant/crda belongs in base (for instance routers don't need
wpa_supplicant but may require
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 10:33:53 Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt static.vor...@gmx.com wrote:
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or not.
On Wednesday 17 of October 2012 01:12:28 you wrote:
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 10:33:53 Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt static.vor...@gmx.com wrote:
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
Pam
31 matches
Mail list logo
