On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:01:50PM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> There have to be edge cases where the replacement does not happen even if I
> never touched a file myself. But I don't know how to debug this.
No, you are mistaken. There are two issues, which is quite apparent if you do
read the
On 21.08.20 22:23, Manuel Reimer wrote:
A diff between the actuall file and its ".pacnew":
$ diff -U 8 -p 00-dns.sh 00-dns.sh.pacnew
--- 00-dns.sh 2013-05-30 19:35:30.0 +0200
+++ 00-dns.sh.pacnew 2020-02-20 22:37:04.0 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
#!/bin/sh
if [
On 21.08.20 22:09, Morten Linderud via arch-general wrote:
There are more ".pacnew" in my /etc. All for files that I never touched
myself.
That is concerning, but it is simply something touching those files you are
unaware of. It's however you system and it's expected that you are aware of
There have to be edge cases where the replacement does not happen even
if I never touched a file myself. But I don't know how to debug this.
There are more ".pacnew" in my /etc. All for files that I never touched
myself.
And about the "system-login"-thing: I'm not the only one who had this
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:28:58PM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> On 21.08.20 22:23, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> > A diff between the actuall file and its ".pacnew":
> >
> >
> > $ diff -U 8 -p 00-dns.sh 00-dns.sh.pacnew
> > --- 00-dns.sh 2013-05-30 19:35:30.0 +0200
> > +++ 00-dns.sh.pacnew
Arch devs,
For the past several updates, I have noticed the kernel sysctl settings
messages saying:
( 5/17) Applying kernel sysctl settings...
Not setting net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter (explicit setting exists).
Not setting net/ipv4/conf/default/rp_filter (explicit setting exists).
Not setting
On 8/21/20 12:25 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> That might have been an interesting precautionary measure for netctl
>> 1.18, at least for printing a message advising people to reenable the
>> service.
> Oh, for the record -- it looks like netctl already did this:
>
>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:25 PM Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
>
> I believe your printer works without hplip and using the driverless
> option. That's something you can also try.
>
'lsusb' is showing this device: <>
'hp-firmware -n' is giving: <>
'hp-config_usb_printer -l warn 001:005' is
On 8/21/20 9:33 AM, das via arch-general wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:25 PM Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
I believe your printer works without hplip and using the driverless
option. That's something you can also try.
'lsusb' is showing this device: <>
'hp-firmware -n' is giving: <>
9 matches
Mail list logo
