The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
Instead of fixing such problems we need something new that's broken too?
You have to know that fixing was tried more than once with various
approaches along time. Parallelism is one of the best-known of these
failed attempts. Smart logs, correct error reporting are
On Jul 27, 2012 6:21 AM, Martin Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
May be this is a silly question but: will there be a general announcement
when systemd became officially adopted?
That would be announced, yes.
As T. G. said in the Dev list:
If a move should happen, I suggest waiting a bit
Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com on Fri, 2012/07/27 11:33:
Thanks to Morris and Christian (karol too, but rather not have an
additional package). Can't seem to find a reference to this specific
behaviour on the pacman manpage, unfortunately, but it'll simplify my
script.
Looks like there's
Hello,
I am new to archlinux, coming from gentoo, and have successful installed
the system so far.
Now I have the problem that when I start X by using startx or startxfce4
(I have only tried this two) I have no keyboard or mouse. I can solve
the problem by disconnecting and reconnecting
On 27/07/12 09:18, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
Instead of fixing such problems we need something new that's broken too?
You have to know that fixing was tried more than once with various
approaches along time. Parallelism is one of the best-known of these
failed
The 23/07/12, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Ignoring systemctl output which is still less clear and slowed me down.
I don't agree.
Show what daemons will be running if you were to boot a filesystem
which isn't running and tell me it's as quick to work out on a systemd
system.
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy enough. :-)
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
May be this is a silly question but: will there be a general announcement
when systemd became officially adopted?
That would be announced, yes.
As you have said the timescale for initscripts being replaced by
systemd comes down to the challenges of maintenance and I guess this
is a
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
quickly adapt to these types of changes. Many don't seem to grasp the
concept that both systems are still supported. In my case because of
my bull head and set ways, I still use the /etc/rc.d/network script
for starting
On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy enough. :-)
Uhm there are init systems
On 27/07/2012 9:29 AM, Mike wrote:
On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy
On Jul 27, 2012 3:16 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
May be this is a silly question but: will there be a general
announcement
when systemd became officially adopted?
That would be announced, yes.
As you have said the timescale for initscripts being replaced by
On Jul 27, 2012 3:25 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net
wrote:
quickly adapt to these types of changes. Many don't seem to grasp the
concept that both systems are still supported. In my case because of
my bull head and
On Jul 27, 2012 3:57 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Jul 27, 2012 3:25 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net
wrote:
quickly adapt to these types of changes. Many don't seem to grasp the
concept that both
On 27/07/12 15:45, Stephen E. Baker wrote:
On 27/07/2012 9:29 AM, Mike wrote:
On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/07/12, Mike wrote:
I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody
said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified.
It would have
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl
wrote:
As you probably know, fish release available in [community] is very old.
Code hasn't been updated since 2009. Official website doesn't work
currently, but there was the info that development is stalled.
Alex
hello,
I'm trying to set up my own DNS server but I can't...
I registered ns1.mydomain.com as a nameserver and I ponted it to my VPS's
IP.
the I listed ns1.mydomain.com as the nameserver of mydomain.com.
I don't know if I've done something wrong with my registrar or my
zones/configs are wrong...
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to set up my own DNS server but I can't...
I registered ns1.mydomain.com as a nameserver and I ponted it to my VPS's
IP.
the I listed ns1.mydomain.com as the nameserver of mydomain.com.
I don't know if I've
thanks a million man...
yes, you're right, domains are public :P
didn't know about named-check*!
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas
is the IP 0.0.0.0 ok? or do I have to change it to the actual public IP
(it's static, so it won't be a problem)
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Δημήτρης
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com wrote:
is the IP 0.0.0.0 ok? or do I have to change it to the actual public IP
Why would you want to have 0.0.0.0 in DNS anyway? If you don't want to
have a www or imap or other subdomains, just delete them
completely... (But
Hi guys,
Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
the package appears to work).
In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses btrfs-progs
and initscripts from testing could verify that
I thought that it would be translated to my public ip... :P
A dig proved that I was wrong, I fixed it, but now I have to wait 2 hours
(TTL 7200) to update the zone?
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi guys,
Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
the package appears to work).
I use btrfs for 3 years now the last 2 is my
all my confs/zones: http://pastebin.com/z23HRyAh
the ONLY thing altered in the confs is the domain
1. You are missing a $ORIGIN line at the top of your zone file:
$ORIGIN dimitrisze.com.
(Don't forget the dot after com!)
That $ORIGIN is implied by bind from the
zone
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
to have one for testing a couple of years ago
I have a multi-device volume, but I'm running systemd. I can validate
that btrfs-progs in testing
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
to have one for testing a couple of years ago
I have a multi-device volume,
On 07/27/2012 01:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi guys,
Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
the package appears to work).
In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses
Hi,
I installed btrfs-progs from testing and regenerated the image
using mkinitcpio. It works fine and my btrfs volume is still being
mounted correctly. I use systemd though and don't have any multi
device btrfs volume either.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@0x01b.net
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
to have
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at
tracepath dimitrisze.com:
1: 192.168.1.300.038ms pmtu 1500
1: 192.168.1.1 0.529ms asymm 2
1: 192.168.1.1 0.517ms asymm 2
2: no reply
3: no reply
ping dimitrisze.com:
Hey list,
Is there a way to enable the testing repo and install updates (with
pacman -Suyy) from the other repositories and only install updates
from testing if I explicitly mention it with some pacman command?
Thanks
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include stdio.h
int
You should never cherry pick updatates. It is all or nothing. Altought you
can use syntax -S repo/pkgname. But if you are going to do that remember
that I will be slaughtered for sharing this information, if you go
complaining about how that broke your system. As long as you dont install
system
On 27.07.2012 22:11, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Is there a way to enable the testing repo and install updates (with
pacman -Suyy) from the other repositories and only install updates
from testing if I explicitly mention it with some pacman command?
Move [testing] below [extra] and [core] in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2012 09:19 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
(that it worked for him. Does anyone know how to fix Thunderbird's
quoting so that it actually quotes?)
Okay, so this will be a real shocker. I was wrong. It works for me as
well. Unsurprisingly, I
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
On 27.07.2012 22:11, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Is there a way to enable the testing repo and install updates (with
pacman -Suyy) from the other repositories and only install updates
from testing if I explicitly mention it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into trouble
with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
None of the following directives will work (culled from different files):
ExecStartPre=cd /etc/solr
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into trouble
with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
None of the following directives will work (culled from different files):
ExecStartPre=cd
So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into trouble
with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
None of the following directives will work (culled from different files):
ExecStartPre=cd /etc/solr
Use:
WorkingDirectory=
ExecStart=$JAVA_HOME/bin/java -jar $JAVA_OPTS
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM, David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Not really, as far as I know. However, it seems that it is common
to put helper scripts that are shipped with systemd in
/usr/lib/systemd/ and those shipped with udev
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:39 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
also note that you likely want to simply run the service differently
that you had previously.
for example, i modify several .service files -- even ones that are
shipped upstream -- because they are pointlessly
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:39 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
for example, i modify several .service files -- even ones that are
shipped upstream -- because they are pointlessly configured as
`forking` when they could be much better integrated (ddclient, dhcpd,
hostapd, SEVERAL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Damjan wrote:
So now that I've got a network through systemd, I ran into
trouble with some daemon service files that I crafted by hand.
None of the following directives will work (culled from different
files):
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Nelson Marambio nelsonmaram...@gmx.de wrote:
Well, the cat-concept was the one I tried before - it may work fine for mp3s
with CBR, but with VBR it fails because you get an inaccurate track length.
There are several tools to recalculate the VBR header;
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:39 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
for example, i modify several .service files -- even ones that are
shipped upstream -- because they are pointlessly configured as
`forking` when they
Hello,
I have a system which is hanging during boot at the line Booting the
kernel when I have a drive connected to either port of the PCI-Express
SATA card I recently installed (chipset ASM1061). When a drive is not
connected to the card, the system boots normally, and connecting the
drive to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Damjan wrote:
I don't know what's that kill dictd but if it's a subprocess
started from your java program, systemd can handle it too. It puts
every service in its own CGroup so it know all the processes
started from that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:53 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Please file bugs if you think there are errors. Sometimes
Type=forking is the right thing to do. If the daemon is not
socket/dbus actiavted, then Type=forking is the only way to know if
a service
50 matches
Mail list logo
