Op 30 sep. 2012 06:37 schreef Nicholas MIller nick.k...@gmail.com het
volgende:
On Sep 29, 2012 10:26 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
...sometimes I want to contact the
devs to bring something up or ask a
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Guus Snijders gsnijd...@gmail.com wrote:
There are sometimes quite interesting details mentioned in the OT threads.
A -discuss list would be a good place for those, without cluttering
-general.
(yes, i'm being an optimist here ;-).
Opening dev-public would
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
...sometimes I want to contact the
devs to bring something up or ask a question on it.
There's a bug tracker where you can directly contact maintainers, for
bugs/feature requests. For 'questions' I'd think that's not really the
On Sep 29, 2012 10:26 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
...sometimes I want to contact the
devs to bring something up or ask a question on it.
There's a bug tracker where you can directly contact maintainers, for
Very eloquently put brethren +1
On Sep 27, 2012 9:33 PM, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
While I would like to support @Tobias idea of splitting the list I also
agree with all the following emails.
Btw, so much time using Arch and I've never heard about
On 09/27/2012 11:34 AM, Tobias Frilling wrote:
The -discussion mailing list could serve as an outlet for this need,
rendering the other list more productive via being moderated; The rule
wouldn't be shut up or be banned, which shouldn't really be
necessary for rational folks like us, but shut
On 28/09/12 19:01, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Can you give some examples of discussions you would see moving to
archlinux-dev?
Sure.
Subject: [arch-general] Modifying archiso
From: Robbie Smith z...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:11
[2012-09-28 11:38:13 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
What you're calling crap are all technical content that could gain with
direct emulation with official maintainers.
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute
On Sep 28, 2012 12:01 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Sep 28, 2012 12:01 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens
On 28 Sep 2012 11:34, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
An option could be to enable moderation on dev-public, still defaulting to
rejecting everything, but allow through high-quality contributions from
the
outside.
I concur this idea, but who's is going to moderate it? You should consider
[2012-09-28 12:01:01 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incompetence.
I'm
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 02:16:23AM +0800, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-09-28 12:01:01 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
On 26/09/12 21:35, Allan McRae wrote:
I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars...
This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages
sent to the list will go to /dev/null.
Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person who
sends an email that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 12:43 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
And we are back...
Sir, you've got some yarbles.
IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too, well, general.
What about if we would split this list up into a list for technical questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Full ack, although I have the feeling that critical discussion is
something what (at least some) devs/admins want to avoid within the
community.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
The problem is not at the general mailing list but at the dev mailing
list side.
archlinux-dev is for contributors and as long somebody is just a user
he should have read-only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 04:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Instead of fragmenting more the mailing lists with the hope of putting
poor contributions out of place for advanced users, let enter the
technical oriented users into the dev mailing list.
I don't
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too, well,
general.
The problem is not that arch-general is the wrong place for the latter
threads. Users are correct
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:28 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
For those users who use the arch forums via a web interface there
seems to be more helpful comments and less trolling than in the
general list - just an observation - maybe that is because the forums
are split into a
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz
karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote:
As it was mentioned a couple times on the list, the forums have
moderators. If you don't behave, you get banned, threads get closed
etc.
OK - it seems to work - when I get frustrated with the mailling list I
go
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:19:31 +0200
Tobias Frilling tob...@frilling-online.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 12:43 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
And we are back...
Sir, you've got some yarbles.
IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:28:02 +0100
mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
For those users who use the arch forums via a web interface there
Is there an alternative way to access the forums? mailing list, usenet?
--
Joakim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 09:44 PM, Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
I can only see two things that can really help slow down/stop/revert the
spiral:
1) Moderation. Get rid of the serial trollers/flamers
2) Get more devs and good people to join and be active.
For
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Joakim Hernberg j...@alchemy.lu wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:28:02 +0100
mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
For those users who use the arch forums via a web interface there
Is there an alternative way to access the forums? mailing list, usenet?
While I would like to support @Tobias idea of splitting the list I also
agree with all the following emails.
Btw, so much time using Arch and I've never heard about
http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux, thanks for that.
I only want to add an observation to what was already said:
Tipically all this
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:32:08PM -0300, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
We Arch Linux users are a kind of users who:
[1 ... 6]
A as user I can subscribe to this 100%, also to your conclusions.
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on
I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars...
This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages
sent to the list will go to /dev/null.
Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person who
sends an email that is not asking for help or providing help.
Allan
28 matches
Mail list logo
