The 23/07/12, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Did you read this before posting. It's obvious that reviewing the config
files and getting the source and finding the bug in C is much easier of
course and can be fixed immediately by anyone without another OS or
machine.
Did you read this before posting.
Hi,
after upgrading to linux 3.5-1 yesterday my computer no longer boots.
:(
The following error is displayed: No volume groups found
I have to run lvm vgchange -a y before I can continue booting.
--
Herbert
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra hsku...@eumx.net wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to linux 3.5-1 yesterday my computer no longer boots. :(
The following error is displayed: No volume groups found
I have to run lvm vgchange -a y before I can continue booting.
What do you get
Hi,
Since the package I was maintening (magicassistant-gtk-multi 1.2.5.2-0) is now
a doublon of (magicassistant-gtk 1.2.5.2-2), can you please merge the comment
and delete it.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 23/07/12, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Did you read this before posting. It's obvious that reviewing the config
files and getting the source and finding the bug in C is much easier of
course and can be fixed immediately
Hello all,
After all the intense discussions about systemd I decided
to try it out and see for myself. I tried it out on my desktop and was
quite impressed by it - it was much faster than the earlier
initscript. Further when I would background a daemon (say the network
daemon) in
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2012 09:52:34 schreef Tanguy ALEXIS:
Hi,
Since the package I was maintening (magicassistant-gtk-multi 1.2.5.2-0) is
now a doublon of (magicassistant-gtk 1.2.5.2-2), can you please merge the
comment and delete it.
Thanks,
Could you please send this requests to
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
2. I have an encrypted btrfs partition which it unlocks normally, but
while trying to mount says:
fsck: fsck.btrfs: not found
The problem seems to be that simply there is no such fsck.btrfs. It simply
does not exist, yet.
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply. I wasn't aware of the changes in
crypttab syntax with systemd; but changing it the way you described it
did the trick for swap.
You're right, on digging deeper (logs) I found that the fsck had
failed earlier as well but I never noticed it as the boot process
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right, on digging deeper (logs) I found that the fsck had
failed earlier as well but I never noticed it as the boot process
wasn't interrupted. I didn't face it again after setting passno. to 0.
I had heard about
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. Also I was wondering if there was any
reason why Arch doesn't have the rc-local.service in systemd by
default. There was some stuff I ran in rc.local (reducing brightness,
proxy authentication) but it seems there is no rc-local service in
systemd. I am working on
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:54:08 +0200, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia
archli...@ishpeck.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Is debian switching
That remains to be seen.
If Debian intends to continue support for Hurd and
KfreeBSD they can't move to
Hi,
On 24 July 2012 11:25, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Also I was wondering if there was any
reason why Arch doesn't have the rc-local.service in systemd by
default.
Have a look at the initscripts-systemd package, it contains rc-local
and
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:31 AM, James Nelson jnl...@gmx.com wrote:
On 07/23/12 20:10, Manolo Martínez wrote:
[Unit]
Description=Unload module before shutdown
Before=shutdown.target
[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/usr/bin/rmmod modulename
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Hi,
Yeah it works fine with the initscripts-systemd package but I had
replaced that with the systemd-sysvcompat package for a pure systemd
setupd. I was wondering if there is a reason why they've discontinued
support for rc.local in that. AFAIK Fedora has a pure systemd setup (I
may be wrong
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rodrigo Rivas
rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:31 AM, James Nelson jnl...@gmx.com wrote:
On 07/23/12 20:10, Manolo Martínez wrote:
[Unit]
Description=Unload module before shutdown
Before=shutdown.target
[Service]
Type=oneshot
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah it works fine with the initscripts-systemd package but I had
replaced that with the systemd-sysvcompat package for a pure systemd
setupd. I was wondering if there is a reason why they've discontinued
support for
Hi,
Thanks for your answer. In the end I decided to stick with
systemd-sysvcompat with my own rc-local.service (since I didn't need
the other stuff in the initscripts-systemd package). I must say I'm
starting to like systemd despite the minor hiccups due to changes in
conventions.
-aurko
On
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
Rodrigo Rivas rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com on Sat, 2012/07/21 00:36:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Rodrigo Rivas rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
On 07/24/12 at 12:44pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rodrigo Rivas
rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:31 AM, James Nelson jnl...@gmx.com wrote:
On 07/23/12 20:10, Manolo Martínez wrote:
[Unit]
Description=Unload module before
Systemd is
larger than init, so for embedded it may well quadruple boot time.
What utter bullshit. Please, Kevin, if you are going to throw around
numbers, do some measurements first.
You keep picking on other subjects too at one tiny part without
considering all that I have said.
Hi,
Am 23.07.2012 17:29, schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
Tested, simply sophisticated and as fast as you make it.
There is no parallelization, no socket activation and no auto mounting.
In no way can it be as fast as systemd.
init=/bin/sh
That happens a lot in embedded.
Once you get to
Did you read this before posting. It's obvious that reviewing the config
files and getting the source and finding the bug in C is much easier of
course and can be fixed immediately by anyone without another OS or
machine.
Did you read this before posting. It's obvious that when a
For having used systemd myself, I am inclined to believe that it
definitely fits the KISS principle.
I welcome the coss platform GUI for controlling services, however on
Arch rc.conf served very well.
I found I can see /etc/inittab and man inittab and edit.
With systemd I had to Google then
Did you read this before posting. It's obvious that reviewing the config
files and getting the source and finding the bug in C is much easier of
course and can be fixed immediately by anyone without another OS or
machine.
Did you read this before posting. It's obvious that when a
Couldn't have said it better. I'm not by any means a technical expert, but
even I could see how much basis his posts had (or didn't)
Those posts were simply pointing out errors/assumptions in baseless
posts and you may not see my points if you haven't done any research on
the foundations of
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On 07/23/2012 06:11 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
Come to think of this, would dkms then be a hard dep for virtualbox?
dkms become an hard dep for virtualbox-source (and
virtualbox-archlinux-source). You
[2012-07-24 13:27:50 +0100] Kevin Chadwick:
you may not see my points if you haven't done any research on
the foundations of UNIX and/or security.
How more ridiculous can you get?
--
Gaetan
Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net on Mon, 2012/07/23 02:01:
Some changes will be introduced in the next package release of virtualbox.
This is when virtualbox 4.1.20 is released? Have not seen anything in the
testing repos yet.
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net on Mon, 2012/07/23 02:01:
Some changes will be introduced in the next package release of virtualbox.
This is when virtualbox 4.1.20 is released? Have not seen anything in the
testing
On 07/24/2012 08:37 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-07-24 13:27:50 +0100] Kevin Chadwick:
you may not see my points if you haven't done any research on
the foundations of UNIX and/or security.
How more ridiculous can you get?
He is not being ridiculous.
He is stating his opinion and that
On 07/24/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Systemd is
larger than init, so for embedded it may well quadruple boot time.
What utter bullshit. Please, Kevin, if you are going to throw around
numbers, do some
[2012-07-24 09:19:27 -0400] Baho Utot:
He is stating his opinion and that should be valued
Baseless opinions are not valuable, they are spam.
His
insight may keep one from doing something stupid simply because he
has looked at the problem from a different light and that should be
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I am sorry you think any thing you have will be a waste of time.
I am looking at this problem of moving to systemd, staying with current
init scripts or moving in the LSB init scripts direction. In order for one
to
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:40:51 +1000
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
[2012-07-24 09:19:27 -0400] Baho Utot:
He is stating his opinion and that should be valued
Baseless opinions are not valuable, they are spam.
Actually they are not baseless even if he didn't explain every
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:07:50 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de:
Btw., in all those discussions about systemd as well as in all those
discussions about PulseAudio, I always read more or less
technical arguments from people who have objections against them or
have tried them and
[2012-07-24 16:07:50 +0200] Heiko Baums:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
Everything is and should stay a file, and every tool should do only
one task but this should be done well.
How about having multiple files, each doing one thing and doing it well?
Wait,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
But I think e.g. regarding the UNIX philosophy he is totally right. And
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
Everything is and should stay a file, and every tool should do only
one task but
Personally, I get exasperated when people don't take the time to
educate themselves before making broad and incorrect assertions. There
is a huge amount of documentation, discussion and other sources of
information about systemd available online. Moreover, there is the
source-code, and even
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Well for me I do not have the time to go about learning the latest and
greatest init system, desktop environment, whatever. I still use KDE3,
I use old school init systems... why? because I use my system to do
work
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2012 10:29:25 schreef Calvin Morrison:
Personally, I get exasperated when people don't take the time to
educate themselves before making broad and incorrect assertions. There
is a huge amount of documentation, discussion and other sources of
information about systemd
On 24 July 2012 10:43, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2012 10:29:25 schreef Calvin Morrison:
Personally, I get exasperated when people don't take the time to
educate themselves before making broad and incorrect assertions. There
is a huge amount of
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
I honestly don't know if this is serious. What is the difference
between a key=value rc.conf and a key=value ini file of systemd?
--
Mantas Mikulėnas
Am 7/24/2012 4:51 PM, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
I honestly don't know if this is serious. What is the difference
between a key=value rc.conf and a
I have seen some comments here about LSB init scripts.
Anyone know where I might obtain an example LSB script template?
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
I honestly don't know if this is serious. What is the difference
between a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Christoph Vigano m...@cvigano.de wrote:
But, those are not Windows-like INI-Files. Those files are meant to be
following some XDG Desktop File Descripton Standard Whose Name I Not Now
(tm), making them easy parseable by existing libraries and programs that
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have seen some comments here about LSB init scripts.
Anyone know where I might obtain an example LSB script template?
Most distros who use sysvinit (not Arch though) use some version of
LSB scripts, take Debian as an
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:07:50 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:40:51 +1000
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
One thing I noticed is that the only people who usually bash Windows are
On 07/24/2012 11:05 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have seen some comments here about LSB init scripts.
Anyone know where I might obtain an example LSB script template?
Most distros who use sysvinit (not Arch though) use
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2012 10:51:05 schreef Calvin Morrison:
On 24 July 2012 10:43, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2012 10:29:25 schreef Calvin Morrison:
Personally, I get exasperated when people don't take the time to
educate themselves before making broad and
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Is there a development in process to take arch init scripts and mold them
into something that is complies with LSB.
No. We are not interested in moving initscripts to LSB. In my opinion
it is a big mess with hardly any
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:12:55 -0400
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 07/24/2012 11:05 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
I have seen some comments here about LSB init scripts.
Anyone know where I might obtain
On 24/07/2012 11:08 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:07:50 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:40:51 +1000
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
One thing I noticed is that
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Christoph Vigano m...@cvigano.de wrote:
Am 7/24/2012 4:51 PM, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too.
I honestly don't know if this
What exactly is wrong
with ini files and/or registry? Perhaps it is your misunderstanding...
Oh please, if you ever dealt with windows registry then you know
it's a totally disfunctional way to keep record of anything.
Over time it gets oversized, filled with crap, slow and totally impractical,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I am sorry you think any thing you have will be a waste of time.
I am looking at this problem of moving to systemd, staying with current
init scripts or moving in the LSB init scripts direction. In order for one
Personally, I get exasperated when people don't take the time to
educate themselves before making broad and incorrect assertions. There
is a huge amount of documentation, discussion and other sources of
information about systemd available online. Moreover, there is the
source-code, and even
The registry is more debatable.
I certainly wish Windows still had ini files and didn't make you eat
with just a knife on a Gigantic API ;-)
--
Why not do something good every day and install BOINC.
On 07/24/2012 06:38 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
Shouldn't it be just
[Unit]
Description=Unload module before shutdown
[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/usr/bin/rmmod modulename
[Install]
WantedBy=shutdown.target
Without multi-user.target or Before=?
In this above approach - can you be
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I wonder if ArmArch will run systemd.
ArchLinux ARM ships systemd, just like we do. On my ARM machine (a
Raspberry Pi running ArchLinux ARM) I use it, and as I mentioned it
works great.
I hope desktop and embedded
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:02:24 -0300
Martin Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
What exactly is wrong
with ini files and/or registry? Perhaps it is your misunderstanding...
Oh please, if you ever dealt with windows registry then you know
it's a totally disfunctional way to keep record of
Over time it gets oversized, filled with crap, slow and totally impractical,
in one word: bloated, and please, while windows may implement one
or two good ideas the underlying infraestructure is as much messy
as is it's registry.
The problem is not with the registry itself, but
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I wonder if ArmArch will run systemd.
ArchLinux ARM ships systemd, just like we do. On my ARM machine (a
Raspberry Pi running ArchLinux ARM) I use it, and as I mentioned it
works great.
I hope desktop and
Hi Ike,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op zaterdag 21 juli 2012 13:30:24 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
Worked well.
But did not solve the problem. Hibernation still seems to work at first,
but when I start the laptop it boots normally, fscks disks because of
I laugh away this trouble.
Is there any information about the advantages of lib - usr/lib?
I like to read it, after I finished the following occupational therapy [1].
I suspect that if I won't do it now, I have to restore my Arch from a backup?
Or can I shutdown and startup anyway?
Regards,
Ralf
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:48:00PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I laugh away this trouble.
Is there any information about the advantages of lib - usr/lib?
I like to read it, after I finished the following occupational therapy [1].
I suspect that if I won't do it now, I have to restore my Arch
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:52 -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
remove udev-compat it is old, either update ld-lsb from aur or remove it
as for the find, remove any un owned files from anything under /lib.
then remove any empty directories
then update
Thank you :)
at least it's not bad that I'm
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:36:05AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The pain is the need to merge new changes while updating. Some tools
(like pacdiff) can help with the job but it's very frustrating to have
one configuration file and merge lot of changes in it. Especially when
it comes to
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:46:52 +0200
Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yclept Nemo orbisvi...@gmail.com wrote:
3) Personally this depends on the final rc.conf, is [1] or [2] going
to be
On Tuesday 24 of July 2012 17:21:46 BOYPT wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra hsku...@eumx.net wrote:
On 24.07.2012 10:51, BOYPT wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra hsku...@eumx.net
wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to linux 3.5-1 yesterday
Hi,
after upgrading, including the switch from /lib to /usr/lib virtualbox
still is ok for kernel 3.4.6-1-ARCH, but when I try to build the modules
for kernel 3.4.4-rt13-2-rt the vboxbuild command doesn't exist.
Until now nothing else seems to be borked.
[root@archlinux spinymouse]# uname -a
2012/7/24 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
Hi,
after upgrading, including the switch from /lib to /usr/lib virtualbox
still is ok for kernel 3.4.6-1-ARCH, but when I try to build the modules
for kernel 3.4.4-rt13-2-rt the vboxbuild command doesn't exist.
Until now nothing else seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Somewhere on a mailing list was announced by a maintainer, that
vboxbuild would be replaced by the use of dkms. But I can't recall
completely where this was mentioned.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 19:09 -0300, rafael ff1 wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/arch-general@archlinux.org/msg28434.html
Thank you,
sorry, I read the thread now.
Regards,
Ralf
On 07/24/2012 01:15 AM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
The beauty behind this is we are now enjoying the new paradigm without
reinstalling the
system while with other distros your only chance to make the switch is
reinstall not only
your OS but everything else!
Cheers.
Now that... is the beauty of
Somewhere on a mailing list was announced by a maintainer, that
vboxbuild would be replaced by the use of dkms. But I can't recall
completely where this was mentioned.
Here!:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-July/028477.html
--
-msx
Oh well!
--
-msx
When using Evolution on Xfce the color theme was broken for a long time.
Some text was unreadable. Today it's fixed :). I already thought about
switching to LXDE. No need to do so now.
Thanx,
Ralf
On 07/25/2012 01:27 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
When using Evolution on Xfce the color theme was broken for a long time.
Some text was unreadable. Today it's fixed :). I already thought about
switching to LXDE. No need to do so now.
This is magic!
Thanx,
Ralf
--
Ionuț
signature.asc
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:08:26 -0500
schrieb Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu:
One thing I noticed is that the only people who usually bash Windows
are those who don't develop or know very little about programming.
You really shouldn't do such assumptions. You couldn't have noticed it,
you're
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:31:22 -0500
schrieb Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu:
The problem is not with the registry itself, but bad programming. Most
software devs under windows have very little understanding of the
registry.
Bad programming is the most favorite answer, and totally nonsense.
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:25:52 +0200
schrieb Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no:
Talking about UNIX philosophy and Windoze like ini files is
probably what gets some people going. It is not technical.
In fact it is technical. Of course, at first glance config files for rc
scripts and ini files are simple
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Seriously, who reads source codes? Manpages usually only explain the
parameters, not the design of the software and how it works. There may
be some other documentations, I haven't yet seen any.
Overview of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Because it's summer, and I'd really rather not try to figure all this
out during the school year, I'm trying to figure out systemd *now*,
rather than waiting until rc.conf goes away.
I actually had trouble with rc.conf when I first installed
Hello All,
Last few days my net connection drops randomly or slows down to a crawl. As a
result, there are several timeouts during package downloads. When a download
timeout occurs, pacman aborts with invalid or corrupted package.
Is it possible to detect which package is corrupt and invalid,
Followup,
On Wednesday 25 Jul 2012 9:03:42 AM Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
With pacman -sy --debug I get following error snippet
-
debug: found cached pkg: /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ati-dri-8.0.4-2-
x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
debug: sig data:
Shridhar Daithankar ghodech...@ghodechhap.net writes:
I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any
timeouts
and it still failed the upgrade with same error for the same package.
So I uninstalled ati-dri and xf86-video-ati. I have intel card and got all
those
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds
jeremiah.do...@gmail.com wrote:
Shridhar Daithankar ghodech...@ghodechhap.net writes:
I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any
timeouts
and it still failed the upgrade with same error for the same package.
So I
Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds
jeremiah.do...@gmail.com wrote:
Shridhar Daithankar ghodech...@ghodechhap.net writes:
I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any
timeouts
and it still failed the upgrade
I must use `autoreconf -i -I m4` in order to build.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:11:42 -0500
Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:40:09 +0700
Diep Pham Van i...@favadi.com wrote:
After apply this patch, I get:
cd /home/favadi/abs/emacs/src/emacs-24.1 automake
On Tuesday 24 Jul 2012 11:58:14 PM Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds
Does it continue after a pacman -Scc?
Why are you recommending clearing his entire cache (which can be quite
useful) when he's already
Am 25.07.2012 02:00, schrieb Heiko Baums:
Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:31:22 -0500
[...]
And it's the most frequent reason why Windoze regularly
(usually every 3 months) needs to be reinstalled.
Heiko
Good morning,
that is / was right for Win 98 or Win ME. Having an exception error
which was
Op woensdag 25 juli 2012 10:30:21 schreef Shridhar Daithankar:
On Tuesday 24 Jul 2012 11:58:14 PM Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds
Does it continue after a pacman -Scc?
Why are you recommending
Bad programming is the most favorite answer, and totally nonsense. The
registry just gets bigger and bigger and is totally cryptic. And the
registry is one of the most frequent reasons for system crashes and
instabilities. And it's the most frequent reason why Windoze regularly
(usually every
95 matches
Mail list logo
