1) Indexing support for in memory event tables. I think this is done, we
should just merge.
2) Indexing support for Event patterns and sequences. e.g Given a query
like following
from d = TaxiTrip - ( TaxiTrip[d.medallion == medallion] or TaxiTrip[ts -
d.ts 30 min])
We need to be able to index
Hi All,
Clustering has been a prominent feature for WSO2 platform and almost all
the production systems use clustering in their environments. When
automating use cases related to clustering, currently there is no way to
startup a cluster using the Test Automation Framework. This would be a very
Hi Srinath,
1) It's already been done
3) Yes, FrequentK, MaxK, and Median functions can be put to the current
release.
We have to implement 2 and 4.
Thanks,
Sachini
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
1) Indexing support for in memory event tables. I think
Hi All,
If webpage containing relative path content there is a problem in gateway
side in AppM. Please find the full analysis in dev mailing list -
[Dev][AppM]App Manager Gateway Test.
Here is the solution for the problem. By using custom mediator we re-write
the all relative path request back to
Sajith,
Can you make this only applicable to selected web apps only?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Sajith Abeywardhana saji...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi All,
If webpage containing relative path content there is a problem in gateway
side in AppM. Please find the full analysis in dev mailing list -
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.com wrote:
Sajith,
Can you make this only applicable to selected web apps only?
No need of doing this. :)
The handler will be added to main sequence. That is where all unresolved
requests would go.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at
Hi Manfred,
The workflow support is not coupled to WSO2 BPS (except the tool for
creation and deployment of simple workflows which I mentioned in the
previous mail), it can be used with any external BPEL engine. So, In the
case of an external BPEL engine we cannot share the data at DB level. That
Hi all,
*purpose Research*
I am currently working on a task that do client-side validation for the
Enterprise Store - Publisher.As for now we have server-side validation by
asset RXT. For example it checks whether the field is required or readonly
as well as validation for URL.I would like to
Some feedback
1. For data sets etc, fill the value version 1.0.0 as default
2. Remove destination when uploading files and saving models, it should
be a one time config at the server level
3. put create project button against each data set
4. Do not ask for a model name, model
Hi Srinath,
Thanks for the feedback. Will update the UI according to suggestions.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
Some feedback
1. For data sets etc, fill the value version 1.0.0 as default
2. Remove destination when uploading files and saving
Hi Srinath
Yes.. that is really confusing and awe need to show the connection between
Datasets and Projects. CD already had a chat with me and mentioned your
concern. Will think of a way to accommodate this. We discussed a solution
for this during our last meeting and that is to give options to
Yes. But we are talking about apps that are already deployed and have an
endpoint. So they have gone pass that configuration step.
The problem lies elsewhere. Inside the app, developers can request for
resources like /bookstore/js/stats.js. in other words they assume the root
to be /bookstore.
On
Agreed. What i am saying is that, we might need a way to turn this off for
some apps.
On 8 Apr 2015 08:06, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.com wrote:
Yes. But we are talking about apps that are already deployed and have an
endpoint. So they have gone pass that configuration step.
The problem
Miyuru, can you try this out and run a bench mark. Please find a good
benchmark and respond to this thread so we can discuss.
Suho, can someone from CEP point him to details and help.
--Srinath
--
Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com twitter:@srinath_perera
Site:
14 matches
Mail list logo