Re: [Architecture] Supporting iOS IPA files that has a Non-Binary plist

Just had a chat with Dinusha and learnt that she'd already merged the fix to carbon-appmgt master. I've, however, added a few comments to the PR suggesting some possible improvements what's been submitted. Please check. Cheers, Prabath On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Dulitha Wijewantha wrote:

Re: [Architecture] [EMM] User certificates for Android devices.

Hi Chathura, +1 for the proposed approach of using SCEP for Wifi-certificate provisioning. This will help us achieve the best architecture for the functionality, while also making sure that the possibility of wifi credentials getting compromised is minimal. Hi Prabath, Would you be able to share

Re: [Architecture] [EMM][APPM] App catalog for mobile devices

One another functionality that's expected as part of the App Catalogue is to be able to support app categorization. After talking to AppM team I learnt that currently we do not have a way to seamlessly add a new application category, as things are hard-coded in the UI rather than fetching the avail

[Architecture] [CDM-F] "Descriptor"-driven plug-ins for CDM-F

Hi Everyone, *Current plug-in architecture of CDM-F* If we look at the current plug-in model of CDM-F (1.x), it consists of three primary components. 1. A Class that extends "DeviceManager" interface providing information on what features/configurations to be managed, what datasources are used f

Re: [Architecture] Swagger, API design and related best practices, and docs

ght modifications to >>> the APIs? Not sure whether its valid though. If it so when it comes to EMM >>> case if there are customers using it, it could have an impact. Also why do >>> we see different standards across different products like AppM and EMM? >>> Naming con

Re: [Architecture] Swagger, API design and related best practices, and docs

to be discussed here in the thread. That is, to push for just one approach, to avoid folks using different methodologies across the platform to do the same things. Cheers, Prabath > > Regards, > > Dilshan > > On 28 April 2016 at 14:53, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > >>

Re: [Architecture] [CDM-F] Making "Device Management Feature" a top level extensible construct in CDM-F

support device identity? There are several > situations where you need to consider device as a top level element rather > than associating it with users. Eg; picking the device from authentication > level, adding throttling policies for device etc. > > Regards, > > Dilshan >

[Architecture] [CDM-F] Making "Device Management Feature" a top level extensible construct in CDM-F

Hi Everyone, As all know, CDM-F is a platform that allows folks to easily extend its plug-in model and seamlessly add support for new device types. So, ATM, "Device Management Plugin" is the primary top level construct that can be extended in the framework, to cater the aforementioned requirement.

[Architecture] Swagger, API design and related best practices, and docs

Hi Everyone, What I'm trying to do primarily is setting up Swagger-based docs for EMM/IoTS related APIs. However, while I was looking deeper into this, came across a few things that I need clarifications upon. *Code-first or Contract-first?* Right now it appears that there are two approaches bei

Re: [Architecture] Implementing UDT(User Defined Types) support for Data Services

I'm afraid with the current model, you wouldn't be able to configure DSS to accept a table of UDTs as an input parameter of a procedure. Since the number of items added to an instance of a "UDT Table" can vary at runtime, the model I suggested previously would also not work (Note that in the exampl

Re: [Architecture] Implementing UDT(User Defined Types) support for Data Services

Hi Alpesh, DSS does not currently support UDTs to be passed into a data service as input parameters. However, if your UDT carries a very primitive sort of a structure without any nested UDTs inside, you should be able to pass them in in-line as shown below. Refer the following DSS query configurat

Re: [Architecture] [EMM] Data Containerization for Android

Excellent stuff! Thanks Pasindu! On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Pasindu Jayaweera wrote: > Hi all, > Implementation of Data containerization for Android BYOD scenario has been > done, except the part of App Managing from AppManager. To implement that > part, it is necessary to get EMM API acc

Re: [Architecture] [IoTS] Is it the right thing to package "analytics" scripts with a plugin implementation?

Hi Srinath, Thanks a bunch for the feedback. We'll proceed as proposed. Cheers, Prabath On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Srinath Perera wrote: > Hi Prabath, > > Agree on your points. I am +1 to have analytics separate. > > --Srinath > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5

Re: [Architecture] [IoTS] Is it the right thing to package "analytics" scripts with a plugin implementation?

ave multiple device types in them i.e. a smart home solution, you essentially need to have something similar, IMO. IoT experts, please do comment in and correct me if I'm wrong. Cheers, Prabath --Srinath > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: &g

Re: [Architecture] [IoTS] Is it the right thing to package "analytics" scripts with a plugin implementation?

t systems. But I believe we have done >> something similar when it comes to deployment of imported API artifacts in >> APIM (Which are deploy-able zip archives, containing sequences, images, DB >> entries and what-not) >> >> Due to reasons mentioned above. I am of the opinio

Re: [Architecture] [IoTS] Is it the right thing to package "analytics" scripts with a plugin implementation?

, images, DB >> entries and what-not) >> >> Due to reasons mentioned above. I am of the opinion that we should bundle >> analytics scripts with the plugin. >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> >> Ruwan Yatawara >> >> Senior Software Engineer, >>

Re: [Architecture] [IoTS] Is it the right thing to package "analytics" scripts with a plugin implementation?

that we should bundle > analytics scripts with the plugin. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Ruwan Yatawara > > Senior Software Engineer, > WSO2 Inc. > > email : ruw...@wso2.com > mobile : +94 77 9110413 > blog : http://ruwansrants.blogspot.com/ > www: :http://wso2.com &g

[Architecture] [IoTS] Is it the right thing to package "analytics" scripts with a plugin implementation?

Hi Everyone, As most of you know, IoTS is a unified platform that allows users to come up with "plugins" and seamlessly add them to the framework to be able to manage different types of devices. For instance, if an organization named "Org-X" manufactures a device type "Dev-X", they can simply adop

Re: [Architecture] Have we looked at supporting "Kiosk" mode as part of the proposed "COPE" implementation?

can > be achieved. > > Regards, > Inosh > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: > >> One of the things that we need to specifically focus on is how we're >> going to let administrators configure this particular mode in EMM. I >> b

Re: [Architecture] Have we looked at supporting "Kiosk" mode as part of the proposed "COPE" implementation?

PI support to achieve the same in Android. >> >> [1]. >> http://www.andreas-schrade.de/2015/02/16/android-tutorial-how-to-create-a-kiosk-mode-in-android/ >> >> Regards, >> Inosh >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Prabath Abeysekera >> wrot

Re: [Architecture] Have we looked at supporting "Kiosk" mode as part of the proposed "COPE" implementation?

id-tutorial-how-to-create-a-kiosk-mode-in-android/ > > Regards, > Inosh > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: > >> What about Android? >> >> >> On Monday, March 7, 2016, Dilshan Edirisuriya wrote: >> >>> This has been

Re: [Architecture] Have we looked at supporting "Kiosk" mode as part of the proposed "COPE" implementation?

What about Android? On Monday, March 7, 2016, Dilshan Edirisuriya wrote: > This has been implemented at backend as well. When DEP is ready we can > create a UI and test the feature. > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: > >> For instance, ch

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Solution requires to remove/reallocate resources assigned to deleted user

hird party products >>> such as LDAPs. Once a user is removed by an outside functionality there is >>> no default way to listen an event or make a workflow to get triggered this >>> into our application. This is why we need to implement *manually* triggered >>> workflow

Re: [Architecture] Solution requires to remove/reallocate resources assigned to deleted user

To my understanding, the most commonly practised use-case in many organizations is that, user management is handled outside third party products. For instance, in a typical EMM deployment, which utilizes IS as a key manager, it is highly unlikely that user provisioning/de-provisioning is done via I

Re: [Architecture] [EMM] Enabling application white listing and application blacklisting support

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Kasun Dananjaya Delgolla wrote: > Hi Lakshman, > > In terms of Android you can use blocking APIs[1] in Marshmallow SDK (SDK > 23) to achieve this. We already use DevicePolicyManager API so you can > straightaway add these new stuff into the same android agent API l

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [EMM200] Performance & Load Testing

One of the performance hits identified while analysing the JFR dumps taken out of EMM 2.0 set-ups is the time taken for token validation. The nature of the aforesaid token validation is that, a service stub is used to invoke an admin service deployed as part of EMM's Key Manager profile for token v

[Architecture] Have we considered using pre-compiled handlebars?

Hi Manu/SameeraM, $Subject? I'm just wondering if we've already got some mechanism/model to use pre-compiled [1] handlebars in applications developed with Jaggery + handlebars. [1] http://handlebarsjs.com/precompilation.html Cheers, Prabath -- Prabath Abeysekara Technical Lead WSO2 Inc. Email:

Re: [Architecture] Web-context parameter support in jaggery.conf

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Harshan Liyanage wrote: > adding @architecture. > > Harshan Liyanage > Software Engineer > Mobile: *+94724423048* > Email: hars...@wso2.com > Blog : http://harshanliyanage.blogspot.com/ > *WSO2, Inc. :** wso2.com * > lean.enterprise.middleware. >

Re: [Architecture] Authenticator support for REST APIs exposed in API Manager, AF, CloudMgt applications

Hi Manjula, On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Manjula Rathnayake wrote: > Hi all, > > Above REST APIs are secured with username/password login. But there are > scenarios, where client(AF or any other server) do not have the password of > the user to login and invoke these APIs. One mechanism intr

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] WSO2 App Manager component V1.1.0 released

Thanks a bunch Ruwan, Rushmin and the AppM team for the support extended to get this released. Let me review and merge the pull requests sent. Cheers, Prabath On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Ruwan Abeykoon wrote: > Hi MDM Team, > > App Manager team is pleased to announce that Component releas

Re: [Architecture] Enforcing checkstyles from Carbon 5 onwards

+1. What if we incrementally start adapting this now itself? Cheers, Prabath On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > I am planning on enforcing checkstyles from C5 onwards. Initially we will > enable it for the kernel and then the rest of the platform. Coding style & > conven

Re: [Architecture] [CDM-Framework/MDM] Compliance monitoring for devices

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm currently in the middle of adding the finishing touches to $Subject > for MDM/CDM-Framework. Shown below is the design I've come up with for the > same. Thought of sharing with a wide

[Architecture] [CDM-Framework/MDM] Compliance monitoring for devices

Hi Everyone, I'm currently in the middle of adding the finishing touches to $Subject for MDM/CDM-Framework. Shown below is the design I've come up with for the same. Thought of sharing with a wider community, for feedback. I believe, the diagram itself is pretty self explanatory. ​In its design,

[Architecture] [MDM] Standardizng SCEP across all mobile device plugins

Hi Everyone, MDM team currently use SCEP for provisioning certificates associated with the device enrolment process of iOS and Windows since they by default demand us to use the same as part of their respective device enrolment strategies. However, this appears to be something useful not only for

[Architecture] Tooling support for developing plugins for CDM-Framework

Hi Everyone, Allowing developers to come up with plugins for various different device types is one of the primary focuses of CDM-Framework. To be able to support the complete plugin development life-cycle with the key products of the platform, developer studio can also be used effectively as the s

Re: [Architecture] [Unified UI Framework] Grouping certain categories of UI blocks together

Hi Ruchira, I'd really appreciate if you can review the requirements posted above and assign someone to get this implemented soon, since this going to be a very critical functionality for us. Cheers, Prabath On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Srinath Perera wrote: > +1 We need this. > > --Srina

[Architecture] [Unified UI Framework] Grouping certain categories of UI blocks together

Hi Everyone, CDM-Framework is a platform that provides room for developers to build plugins upon various different device types such as mobiles, smart devices, etc. Therefore, it's one of the key functionalities of the process of plugin development that we have the ability to organize certain UI b

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] AppM MDM Integration

Manager. We're all good as long as we have everything (and maybe more) that's related to MAM aspects covered in the new face of it, without losing any feature that was previously released as part of EMM 1.1.0. Cheers, Prabath > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:0

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] AppM MDM Integration

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chathura Dilan wrote: > Hi Inosh, > > We are not storing device info in App Manager. App subscription is only > associate with the user. If you subscribe to an app using a device, we > consider it as the user who belong that device subscribe to the app. > Does th

Re: [Architecture] [Urgent] Permissions of Units in Unified UI

ar 25, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > Hi Manu, Ruchira, > > Any possibility to get things rolling a little faster around this > implementation? > > Cheers, > Prabath > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: > >> [Moving

Re: [Architecture] [Urgent] Permissions of Units in Unified UI

Hi Manu, Ruchira, Any possibility to get things rolling a little faster around this implementation? Cheers, Prabath On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > [Moving to architecture@ as this discussion belongs there] > > Cheers, > Prabath > > On Fri, Mar

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] Mobile Application List Service

ecord this in JIRA (as a functional enhancement) so we won't lose track of it. Cheers, Prabath On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Dinusha Senanayaka wrote: > Hi Prabath, > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: > >> Hi Chathura, >

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] Mobile Application List Service

Hi Chathura, Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the platform standard so far has been exposing APIs via "API Everywhere" which basically re-uses the existing API-Management components and other infrastructure (OAuth to secure endpoints, etc) within the platform. Any reason why you've decided to g

Re: [Architecture] [Urgent] Permissions of Units in Unified UI

[Moving to architecture@ as this discussion belongs there] Cheers, Prabath On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Manuranga Perera wrote: > >> +1 for ability for enable/disable visibly of a unit based on permissions. >

Re: [Architecture] [AppM] [CDM] Mobile Application List Service

Hi Chathura, Would you be able to sit with CDM team for a couple of days and get this done end-to-end ASAP? That'll make everyone's life easier I believe. Cheers, Prabath On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Inosh Perera wrote: > Adding Dilshan > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Inosh Perera wr

Re: [Architecture] [UX] CDM-Framework/MDM UX/UI

gt;>> *Next Steps* >>> - Provide markup/css for the detailed (Device) page (Should be able to >>> provide within this week) >>> - We will provide those css updates and markup release for the filtering >>> component as soon as Jerad completes. >>> >>&

Re: [Architecture] [UX] CDM-Framework/MDM UX/UI

ng. I prefer if you can change the >>> presentation of steps when accessing through a mobile phone and would be >>> great if you can highlight completed steps in a different way. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Prabath Abeysekera >>> wrote: >&

Re: [Architecture] [UX] CDM-Framework/MDM UX/UI

Hi Dhanuka, Super awesome UIs! :) @Chan, Manu: Let's try to get these implemented on top of the Unified UI Framework. Cheers, Prabath On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Dhanuka De Silva wrote: > Hi All > > 1. [CDM] iOS related UIs needed for Milestone 2 > Visual designs and markup required for

[Architecture] [CDM] SCEP support in Identity Server

Hi Johann/Pulasthi, CDM team is currently in the process of adding iOS device management capabilities into MDM (Mobile Device Manager) and $subject is going to be a critical part of the implementation. Currently, we've got this covered through some SCEP impl that we'd already done ourselves. Howev

Re: [Architecture] [Meeting Minutes] Unified UI Framework

Hi Guys, Great. Thanks for the update. Will schedule a meeting some time next week to discuss about this in detail. Cheers, Prabath On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Manuranga Perera wrote: > Hi Prabath, > > > We have finalized the design of the UI framework, and we can start > implementing CDM

Re: [Architecture] EMM - Android : Writing Test Cases

Hi Guys, We need to get this rolling again. Let's focus on getting some good test cases written around Android agent and the related functionalities some time soon. Also, please make sure that the same is done for the other applicable platforms as well. Cheers, Prabath On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:1

Re: [Architecture] [Meeting Minutes] Unified UI Framework

Hi Ruchira, Manu, It's in our plans that, if possible, we adapt the Unified UI framework into CDM as part of its UI strategy. Any idea as to when this is going to be released? Wanted to check on the release dates just to see if this aligns with the CDM release plans. Cheers, Prabath On Fri, Jul

Re: [Architecture] Dynamic Client Registration for CDM

Great. Thanks Sumedha for the prompt response. Cheers, Prabath On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote: > This is already included in AM 1.9.0 plan and already being worked out. > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Prabath Abeysekera > wrote: > >> Hi

[Architecture] Dynamic Client Registration for CDM

Hi Everyone, Just wondering where we are on $subject and if we've got any plans to support this anytime soon. I believe, CDM has a definite use-case for dynamic client registration in which we need a mechanism to let the agent applications (that run on some devices such as mobile, etc to communic

Re: [Architecture] Maintaining carbon-store GitHub repo

s://github.com/wso2/product-es/tree/master/modules/distribution/src/dbscripts/storage > [3] > https://github.com/wso2/product-es/tree/master/modules/distribution/src/repository > [4] https://github.com/wso2/product-es/tree/master/modules/apps > > Thanks! > - Ayesha > > On W

Re: [Architecture] Maintaining carbon-store GitHub repo

Hi Ayesha, On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Ayesha Dissanayaka wrote: > Hi all, > > I have completed basic repo separation discussed above along with commit > history of the code base.(https://github.com/ayshsandu/carbon-store). I > still need to include some necessary resource directories to th

Re: [Architecture] Carbonising Data Node

/Setting+up+Storage+Server+with+HDFS >>> ). This is felt as a certain shortcoming in the SS HDFS provisioning >>> process and should be addressed in SS future version 1.5.0. The solution is >>> to implement the datanode as Carbon Component which loads at startup and >&g

Re: [Architecture] WSO2 MB Proposed RDBMS Design

In addition, triggers, usually, are like stored procedures in its context and at times, might store some good portion of your business logic within the database layer which makes them less visible to someone who's evaluating a particular high-level business use-case just by looking at some code lev

Re: [Architecture] [Storage Server] Workflow support for provisioning related tasks

e of workflows in such kind of management activities on "key > resources"? This is a fundamental concept of TOSCA (that I contributed to) > which might be of interest to you... > > > Best regards, > Frank > > 2014-09-09 17:05 GMT+02:00 Prabath Abeysekera : >

Re: [Architecture] WSO2 Storage Sever : Automatic Kerberos ticket generation support for HDFS

Hi Poshitha, On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Poshitha Dabare wrote: > Description > > Currently, "kinit" is used to obtain a Kerberos ticket as part of > authenticating a user who accesses the HDFS management functionalities > through SS management console. This particular tool is Linux specific

Re: [Architecture] [Storage Server] Workflow support for provisioning related tasks

Fayaza, Please also make sure we keep the thread posted regularly on the progress of the implementation while you proceed with the task. Cheers, Prabath On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Faathima Fayaza wrote: &

Re: [Architecture] [Storage Server] Workflow support for provisioning related tasks

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Faathima Fayaza wrote: > Hi, > > *Problem:* > > Currently, most of the functionalities supported via WSO2 Storage Sever > are straight-forward but less in controllability.For example, in the > current implementation if a user needs to create a database, they can >

Re: [Architecture] Giving tenant admins the ability to add database servers to be provision in Storage Server

feedback. I will look in to them >> with this feature. >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Prabath Abeysekera >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Harsha, >>> >>> One another addition to the problem statement would be to let tenant >>>

Re: [Architecture] Carbonising Data Node

Hi Poshitha, Would you be able to add a small description on why this is being implemented and the design considerations, etc you might have had to come up with while you;re into it? Cheers, Prabath On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Poshitha Dabare wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to start the datan

Re: [Architecture] Giving tenant admins the ability to add database servers to be provision in Storage Server

Hi Harsha, One another addition to the problem statement would be to let tenant admins use/provision their privately held persistent storage options within a particular hosted environment. This sort of a feature can come in handy particuarly for users who want to provision their storage options vi

Re: [Architecture] Fwd: Create CQL data source from master-datasources.xml

eware > > phone : +94 715381915 > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Dhanuka Ranasinghe > Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM > Subject: Create CQL data source from master-datasources.xml > To: WSO2 Developers' List > Cc: Prabath Abeysekera , Hasitha Hiran

Re: [Architecture] [MB] Publisher flow control in WSO2 Message Broker

Hi Srinath/Ishara, To update on the progress made on the task, I've delved deep into this and thought the ConnectionThrottleFilter would not really completely solve the problem at hand. What it does seems to be throttling the clients making connections to the server in quick successions but it doe

[Architecture] JsonPath support for Script medaitor

Hi, Just wondering whether having $subject will be useful if this is not supported OOTB. With the increasing demand for JSON processing and Script mediator currently being one of the key elements in terms of performing JSON related transformations, I'm wondering whether it'll be good to have this

[Architecture] [SS] Supporting permission schemes for different RDBMS types in Relation Storage Provisioning Manager

Hi, *Requirement:* With the immediate upcoming release, Storage Server supports provisioning a good stack of RDBMS types such as SQLServer, Postgres, Oracle, etc in addition to MySQL. Each one of those above mentioned RDBMS types exposes its own permission models that usually consist of a few ove

Re: [Architecture] Storage Server implementation in WSO2Store

gt;> semantics underneath. Examples of this include MogileFS and KosmosFS. >> Any of these would probably work for you. Since you're also looking for >> a webserver, though, I think I'd lean toward the Swift/S3 solutions that >> are already basically webservers

Re: [Architecture] Storage Server implementation in WSO2Store

Hi Sanjiva, On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > >> >>> I'm wondering whether using a relational DB blob store is good enough >>> for a start. >>> >> >&g

Re: [Architecture] Storage Server implementation in WSO2Store

Hi Sanjiva, On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > BTW please don't copy private lists in public discussions! > > Chan the picture is not quite right .. the store will use SS only to > *provision* a volume (directory) for a tenant. After that it will use HDFS > APIs to direc

Re: [Architecture] Storage Server - HDFS Browser

lan for a Jaggery app too. We'd also probably need to think of writing similar apps for Cassandra Explorer, etc? > > Sanjiva. > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Shani Ranasinghe wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your feedback. Please find my comment

Re: [Architecture] Storage Server - HDFS Browser

Hi Sumedha, On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote: > Some feedback. > Your using the same tree view being used by Registry Explorer. right? If > not, please use the same. The functionality required is almost the same. > > 'RenameFolder' is missing a space. > > String 'Folder'

Re: [Architecture] Supporting multiple environments for the API Gateway

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote: >> >>> We (Sumedha, Srinath, Azeez, Sanjiva and a f

Re: [Architecture] Supporting multiple environments for the API Gateway

Hi, On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote: > >> We (Sumedha, Srinath, Azeez, Sanjiva and a few from the APIM-Team) had a >> meeting to discuss on $subject and we came to a conclusion to maintain >> production and sand

[Architecture] WSO2 Storage Server 1.0.3 Released!

WSO2 Storage Server (WSO2 SS) 1.0.3 Released! WSO2 Storage Server (WSO2 SS) team is pleased to announce the release of its version 1.0.3. WSO2 Storage Server conveniently delivers multi-tenant structured and unstructured data storage provisioning capabilities to development projects. Development

Re: [Architecture] [App Factory] allowing apps to get a keyspace for their use

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Srinath Perera wrote: > +1 I think it is only UI bits we need to do > +1. I would also imagine the same requirement that we came across while integrating relational database provisioning to AF, which is, having another abstraction layer on top of the existing pro

Re: [Architecture] [AS] [MB] Complexities in integrating AS with MB as JMS Transport is enabled for all the deployed services

Hi, On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Shammi Jayasinghe wrote: > Hi Ishara, > > Yes, We are unable to support dynamic queues with AMQP 0-91 version. > Because of that problem we have solved this issue in a different way.[1]. > If you get the latest JMS transport library in to the App Server, it s