Hi Dushan,
I am working on connection pool implementation for Kafka Connector. By next
week, I am going to start implementing the JMS connector. I will let you
know while designing the connector.
Thanks,
Kathees
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Dushan Abeyruwan wrote:
> Hi Kathees,
> Yes, t
Hi Kathees,
The underlying implementation of pool can have a significant impact on the
performance. See the architecture tread "bench marks for object pool
implementations"
What is reason for going for a custom implementation here? Since this is a
custom implementation it might be a good idea to
Hi Malaka,
Yes. Once I compare this performance with other implementations and will
arrange a code review.
@Malith
I will compare the performance of this custom connection pool
implementation with other implementations as it is mentioned in the mail
thread [1] that Stormpot throughput is highest,
Hi Kathees,
Yes, there seems to be an obvious improvement. However, when comes to JMS
connector,try to design that more generic, I guess that can be done with
some customizations of what Hasitha has done.
Anyway, please do let me know when JMS genetic connector design planned, we
can run through
Seems like a significant improvement.
I guess pool exists per node in cluster?
Once completed please arrange a code review.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Kathees Rajendram
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on connection pool implementation for Kafka [1] and JMS [2]
> connectors. In the existin
Hi,
I am working on connection pool implementation for Kafka [1] and JMS [2]
connectors. In the existing connectors, connections are created and closed
per message which gives the performance issue. I have improved the Kafka
connector with configurable connection pool parameter. When publishing th
