I agree, +1 for a form-based approach. Being able to make changes there
and observe the output BPEL would help users learn the format and structure.
Thanks,
Colin Roy-Ehri
Software Engineer
*WSO2, Inc. : wso2.com http://wso2.com/*
*Mobile* : 812-219-6517
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:07
Dear Pulasthi,
having a way to define simple BPEL processes in a form-based manner would
be great! Do you have some details on this?
Best regards,
Frank
2015-04-20 8:42 GMT+02:00 Pulasthi Mahawithana pulast...@wso2.com:
Hi Frank,
We thought of having a simple form based approach at user
Hi Frank,
We thought of having a simple form based approach at user end. We will use
some BPELs as templates and get the inputs from a form to customize it.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Frank Leymann fr...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Pulasthi,
when you have users without BPEL knowledge in mind,
Hi Pulasthi,
when you have users without BPEL knowledge in mind, you assume that these
users have programming skills, correct? I.e. that they provide the
workflow process in JavaScript, for example, correct?
Or do you work on a new very easy-to-use workflow language?
Best regards,
Frank
Hi Manfred,
The workflow support is not coupled to WSO2 BPS (except the tool for
creation and deployment of simple workflows which I mentioned in the
previous mail), it can be used with any external BPEL engine. So, In the
case of an external BPEL engine we cannot share the data at DB level. That
Hi Pulasthi,
thank you for info about BPMN implementation.
Is the workflow executor database a datastore for workflow-data at
product-level? The called workflow engine stores the workflow-data for
execution in BPS, right? This leads to redundant workflow-data.
Why should/can I not install
Hi Manfred,
The executor can be used with both. BPEL only support is for the tool we
plan to provide for creation and deployment of simple workflows. We will
consider extending it to support BPMN also when the next WSO2 BPS version
is released with BPMN support.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:11 AM,
Hi Pulasthi,
you mentioned only BPS/BPEL-engine. What about the
BPS/BPMN-activiti-engine? Should it not a prefered way to define workflows?
best regards
Manfred
2015-04-04 14:40 GMT+02:00 Pulasthi Mahawithana pulast...@wso2.com:
Hi Frank,
I sent a separate mail[1] with the architecture. Our
Hi Frank,
I sent a separate mail[1] with the architecture. Our main objective was to
provide the workflow support for the events in IS and [1] was designed to
address that. Furthermore we plan to provide a way to easily configure a
workflow process and deploy it at BPS (for the users without BPEL
Hi Johann and all,
As per the offline chat with Pulasthi, the executor serialize the workflow
info and save in the database before calling the bpel service. (see the
diagram below)
So in our case if we are to use this component, we will have to do a
network call with all the information for
Hi Pulasthi, hi Tanja,
can you provide a consolidated architecture figure, please? Can you also
position in your architecture BPS? I assume the requirements you address
by your architecture is the ability to create an on-ramp workflow for ES,
AM,... in a fast way, correct?
Thanks!
Best
Hi Tanya,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Tanya Madurapperuma ta...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are in the process of implementing the workflow support for ES and came
across the $Subject.
Although many products have worflow support, seems there is no generic
component to achieve this.
12 matches
Mail list logo
