/forced-password-reset/
Thanks,
Gayan
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:15 PM gayan gunawardana
wrote:
> Thanks Maduranga! I will try latest.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:40 AM Maduranga Siriwardena
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gayan,
>>
>> M19 milestone of the Identity Serv
Thanks Maduranga! I will try latest.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:40 AM Maduranga Siriwardena
wrote:
> Hi Gayan,
>
> M19 milestone of the Identity Server 5.11.0 is also released couple
> of days ago.
>
> Regards,
> Maduranga
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020, 7:04 PM gayan gu
feedback on 5.11.0-m18 at [2]
>
> [1] https://wso2.com/identity-and-access-management/product-roadmap/
> [2] https://github.com/wso2/product-is/releases
>
> Cheers,
> Ruwan A
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:54 PM gayan gunawardana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi IAM Team,
&g
Hi IAM Team,
React based new User-portal released with IS 5.10.0 is really great.
Similar way is there a plan in road map to release Admin-portal where admin
users can manage identities of other users ?
--
Gayan
___
Architecture mailing list
Architectu
a CPU intensive task and might introduce some
security vulnerabilities as well.
3. For same set of words different people can come up with
different Regular expressions.
Also having flexibility to write own validation might introduce some open
ended problems for simple requirement.
>
> Thanks
>
&
Hi Tharindu,
In #6 Validating the Token, regex validation may work for reference access
tokens to find corresponding Oauth provider but can we utilize regex
validation for self-contained access tokens. Is it possible mediate token
generation and append specific prefix to identify Oauth provider or
pimgt/blob/master/components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/apimgt/gateway/handlers/security/APIAuthenticationHandler.java#L288
Thanks,
Gayan
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:25 PM gayan gunawardana
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 3:56 PM Piraveena Paral
*
> Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
> *(m)* +94776099594 | *(e)* pirave...@wso2.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:44 PM gayan gunawardana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Piraveena,
>>
>> Thanks for detail response.
>> However I am referring to APIM synapse endpoints
thenticator+with+SSL+Termination
>
> Thanks,
> Piraveena
> *Piraveena Paralogarajah*
> Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
> *(m)* +94776099594 | *(e)* pirave...@wso2.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:47 AM gayan gunawardana <
> gmgunaward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:49 AM Asela Pathberiya wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 AM gayan gunawardana <
> gmgunaward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi APIM team,
>>
>> Is there any recommended deployment pattern to implement [1] if SSL
>> termi
Hi APIM team,
Is there any recommended deployment pattern to implement [1] if SSL
termination happen from load balancer ?
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM260/Securing+APIs+with+Mutual+SSL
--
Gayan
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.or
is the general direction of
> tenant model improvement.
>
> Cheers,
> Ruwan A
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:29 PM gayan gunawardana <
> gmgunaward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi IAM Team,
>>
>> Does WSO2 Identity Server road
Hi IAM Team,
Does WSO2 Identity Server road map have $subject ? & is there any plan to
remove current multi-tenancy model in near future release ?
Thanks,
Gayan
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Reference-userObject
> [2]
> https://docs.wso2.com/display/IS570/Configuring+User-Age-Based+Adaptive+Authentication
>
Thanks a lot for Information
>
> Cheers,
> Ruwan
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:12 PM gayan gunawardana <
> gmgunaward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:40 PM Darshana Gunawardana
wrote:
> Hi Johann,
>
> If we are considering a provisioning scenarios in a authentication flow
> (JIT flows), we should be able use scripting capabilities in adaptive
> authentication to inject\modify a claim with transformation.
>
This is gre
This is a great initiative.
Small clarification, can there be overlapping features between Service Mesh
and APIM such as rate limiting, end user authentication [1][2] ?
[1] https://istio.io/docs/tasks/policy-enforcement/rate-limiting/
[2] https://istio.io/help/ops/security/end-user-auth/
Thanks,
Hi Ruwan,
This is a very good initiative and I have few things to clarify.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 8:38 AM Ruwan Abeykoon wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> *Why ${subject} **? *
> *I*mplement "Circuit Breaker" pattern in user store manager is becoming
> an essential part when it comes to multi tenant and mu
Hi Indunil,
In conclusion this will introduce "Local and Outbound Authentication
Configuration" to resident IDP UI and that will be the default
authentication sequence for tenant .
Is my understanding correct ?
Any way this will be very useful because some organizations don't want to
change their
need two separate outbound
>>> connectors. It could mean we use one connector but that single connector
>>> supports both of the protocols at the same time.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Dimuthu
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 3:26
a
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Gayan Gunawardana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Isuranga,
>>
>> Could you be able to move *identity-outbound-**provisioning-scim2* to
>> *identity-outbound-provisioning-scim* by having configuration option for
>> SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 ?
being swallowed in the client
>> without passing them back to the connector [1]. In that case, the
>> provisioning connector might not know if the request has been success or
>> not and act accordingly.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-client-scim2/
gt;>>> wso2-extensions organization?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. *identity-outbound-provisioning-scim2*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the outbound connector
>>>>>>>>>
from DCR specification but the problem is how to
store this initial access token securely in mobile application.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
gt;
>
> *Email : hasi...@wso2.com *
>
> *Mobile : +94713850143 <+94%2071%20385%200143>[image:
> http://wso2.com/signature] <http://wso2.com/signature>*
>
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
h
>> *Mobile* : +94776099594 <+94%2077%20609%209594>
>> <http://wso2.com/signature>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Hasini Witharana*
> Software Engineering Intern | WSO2
>
>
> *Email : hasi...@wso2.com *
>
> *Mobile : +94713850143 <+94%2071
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Isuranga Perera
wrote:
> Hi Gayan,
>
> In that case, I'll try to create an SDK from swagger and use it as the
> client.
>
That would be great.
>
> Best Regards
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote
/ProvisioningClient.java
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Johann Nallathamby
> wrote:
>
>> *[+ IsharaK, Omindu, Farasath]*
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Isuranga Perera <
>> isurangamper...@g
github.com/HansageeSJ/scim-client
>> [3] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-5695
>>
>> Appreciate any suggestions.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Isuranga Perera
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Gayan Gunawardana
>> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby*
> Senior Lead Solutions Engineer
> WSO2, Inc.
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> Mobile - *+9476950*
> Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.co
gt;
>>* Evaluates if this step is applicable on the current authentication
>> context.
>>
>> ..
>>
>>*/
>>
>> boolean isApplicable(StepConfig stepConfig, AuthenticationContext
>> context);
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
check the context
inside authenticator canHandle.
*#option 01 *
Increase the priority of newly added authenticator and check existence of
oauth application from client key.
WDYT?
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
t;>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Asela
>>
>> ATL
>> Mobile : +94 777 625 933 <+94%2077%20762%205933>
>> +358 449 228 979
>>
>> http://soasecurity.org/
>> http://xacmlinfo.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
om/vindula.jayawardana>
>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay>
>>>>
>>>> *“Respect is h
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Isura Karunaratne wrote:
> Hi Gayan,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Gayan Gunawardana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are in the process of Implementing password policy validation feature
>> for IS 6.0.
, default password policies and custom
password policies then you can keep both configurations are enabled. If you
want to enable only custom policy then you can disable default policies.
Appreciate your suggestions regarding this.
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc
gt; E: hasan...@wso2.com
> M :0718407133| http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>
>
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
com/in/dinalidabarera>
>> Mobile: +94770198933 <+94%2077%20019%208933>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <https://lk.linkedin.com/in/dinalidabarera>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>&g
ds,
>>
>> Nuwandi Wickramasinghe
>>
>> Software Engineer
>>
>> WSO2 Inc.
>>
>> Web : http://wso2.com
>>
>> Mobile : 0719214873
>>
>> ___
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Archite
date.
>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Kasun Gajasinghe*Associate Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc.
>> email: kasung AT spamfree wso2.com
>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
>> blog: http://kasunbg.org
>> phone: +1 650-745-4499 <(650)%20745-4499>, 77 678 0813
>>
>>
>
>
>
not need to define it separately in domain-config.yaml right ?
>
>
>>> Shall we add a method to User[1] class to retrieve username?
>>>
>> +1 to have a method in User.java
>>
>>>
>>> [1] - https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity-mgt/blob/master/com
&g
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are in the process of implementing password history validation feature
>> for IS 6.0.0. Architecture of this fe
gt;
> E: hasan...@wso2.com
> M :0718407133| http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Farasath Ahamed
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 15, 2017, Dilan Udara Ariyaratne
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
Hi Imesh,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>>
>> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS IDN_PASSWORD_HISTORY_DATA (
>> ID INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
>> USER_UNIQUE_ID VARCHAR(
uot;).
>>>
>> So, it will always be http://wso2.org/claims/username, not configurable?
>>
>>>
>>> Shall we add a method to User[1] class to retrieve username?
>>>
>> +1 to have a method in User.java
>>
>>>
>>> [1] - https://
user from identity store so we need to
set value got from out side to appropriate claim. In that case there should
be a way to identify username claim.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 80
t; [1] https://github.com/wso2-dev-ux/product-is/blob/master/
> Wireframes/admin-portal/v3/3.32%20%20Reset%20password%
> 20with%20offline%20OTP%20-%20password%20generated.png
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hasanthi Dissanayake
>
> Software Engineer | WSO2
>
> E: hasan...@wso2.com
> M
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Isura Karunaratne wrote:
> Hi Gayan,
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are in the process of implementing password history validation feature
>> for IS 6.0.0. Arch
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Johann Nallathamby
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Johann Nallathamby
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>&g
tory record. We need to use the particular
> algorithm to do the comparison, not the system configured one.
>
+1
>
> Cheers,
> Ruwan
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are in the process of impl
;>
>>>> --
>>>> *Thanuja Lakmal*
>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>> WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/
>>>> *lean.enterprise.middleware*
>>>> Mobile: +94715979891 +94758009992
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
perty.
[1] [Architecture] Force Password Reset and Password History validation
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2
n? If so
>>> +1 for using a param. Else, we can include the domain name as a part of
>>> the username (IINM we support this in C4 as well), so searching only in a
>>> particular domain will look like below.
>>>
>>> /scim/v2/Users?filter=userName+EQ+FOOD
serName+EQ+vindula&domain=
@Ishara, Johann, Ayoma appreciate your input.
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Archi
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Thanuja Jayasinghe
wrote:
> Hi Gayan,
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> How listUsers, listGroups methods should behave when domain is not
>> specified ?
>>
>
provide paginated, filtered
result.
IMO behavior of *1* is correct but *2, 3, 4 need to be *consistent. I think *2,
3 *also behave as *4*. Please correct me If I am wrong.
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71
gt;
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Omindu
>>
>> --
>> Omindu Rathnaweera
>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby*
> Technical Lead & Product Lead of WSO2 Identity Server
> Governance Technologies Team
> WSO2, Inc.
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> Mobile - *+9476950*
> Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>*
>
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
ate":"CREATED"}*}
>
> +1 to have enterprise user extension for "state" attribute. What are the
available values for "state" attribute and also check "active" attribute in
standard schema.
> Appreciate your ideas.
>
> [1] https://github.
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Ruwan Abeykoon wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> +1 to have an exception hierarchy, which carries information for
>>> specific errors.
>>>
>>> I think we should follow the way Java IO exceptions are done.
>>&
hanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
| Subscribe | Mail Archive
<http://wso2.org/mailarchive/dev/>
-
User Forum : StackOverflow
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/wso2is>
Reporting IssuesWe encourage you to report issues, improvements and feature
requests regarding WSO2 Identity Server through public WSO2 Identity Server
JIRA <https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY>.
~ The WSO2 Identity Server Team ~
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Johann Nallathamby
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Gayan Gunawardana
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Fe
>> Email: is...@wso2.com
>> Mob : +94 772 254 810 <+94%2077%20225%204810>
>> Blog : http://isurad.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Omindu Rathnaweera
> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211>
g conflict when a new user add with same username.
>
> Regards,
> Darshana
>
>> And in our implementation we have inactive, and disable option for that
>> to handle not permanently delete case.
>>
>> -Ishara
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Darsha
tly affected to SCIM
implementation according to [1].
[1]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7644#section-3.6
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architect
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Johann Nallathamby wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Indunil Upeksha Rathnayake <
>> indu...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>
st to /Me end
point and consider 409 as user already exist. IMO API level better option
would be to build some custom implementation on top of /Me end point to
check whether user exist.
>
>> Thanks & regards,
>> -Prabath
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:41 A
;
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Prabath
>
> Twitter : @prabath
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/prabathsiriwardena
>
> Mobile : +1 650 625 7950 <(650)%20625-7950>
>
> http://facilelogin.com
>
> __
his in two steps.
>> 1. Convert these identity management APIs to use the SCIM request
>> response format.
>> 2. Implement as SCIM extensions.
>>
>> So +1 to start with the step 1 and later go with 2
>> Thanks,
>> Ishara
>>
>> On Mon, J
Attaching missing images.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> SCIM Overview and Concept
> SCIM stands for “Simplified Cloud Identity Management” and later it has
> been changed to “System for Cross-domain Identity Management”. SCIM was
> originally d
UserAdmin, RemoteUserStoreManagerService, UserInformationRecoveryService
with standard SCIM APIs.
Much appreciate your suggestions and feedbacks.
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (7
t;>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ishara Karunarathna
>>>>>>> Associate Technical Lead
>>>>>>> WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware | wso2.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> email: isha...@wso2.com, bl
;> Ishara Karunarathna
>>>>>> Associate Technical Lead
>>>>>> WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware | wso2.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> email: isha...@wso2.com, blog: isharaaruna.blogspot.com, mobile:
>>>>
t;>>
>>>>> 6. In *handlePostAuthentication()*, it checks the property set in
>>>>> step 2 and identifies this as the response of post authentication
>>>>> extension
>>>>> task therefore calls the post authentication extension.
>&
anks!
>>>> -Ayesha
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Ayesha Dissanayaka*
>>>> Software Engineer,
>>>> WSO2, Inc : http://wso2.com
>>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwso2.com&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEZvyc0uMD
INT, month INT, day INT, hour INT, minute INT, action INT,
userName STRING, userstoreDomain STRING, IP STRING, region STRING,
tenantDomain STRING, rememberMeFlag BOOLEAN, userAgent STRING, _tenantId
INT, _timestamp LONG -i", primaryKeys "sessionId"
*We have to consider having mult
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
>> shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Gayan Gu
Hi Shankar,
I will remove private information and send descriptive mail to
architecture.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This feature will provid
EN we have the same problem), so we should figure out
a general schema for IDN_USER_SESSION_DATA that can be used for all types
of users.
Thanks,
Gayan
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (7
;>>>>> Username recovery is supported only with an email notification.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thus, the visibility of this option would be decided on required
>>>>>>>>>>> email transport configurations
>>>>>>>&
are*
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Isura Dilhara Karunaratne
> Sen
>>> "key": "f75da810-3478-47f4-80e5-c37556392015"
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Reset Password.*
>>>>
>>>> PUT /accountrecovery/rest/notificat
ise . Middleware*
>
>
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.c
in connected IDPs
with a unique ID specific to each IDP (SCIM_ID, username etc), IDP name,
Local unique id, Local user name.
For both smart mode and dumb mode we keep this data which will help us to
implement a distributed user view of the user in future.
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer
but it isn't a major requirement.
>
> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-3110
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In WSO2 Identity Server 5.0.0 we can register Service Providers to
>> consume different proto
-A utilize only Oauth and SP-B utilize only SAML. There are two
user stores like a.com and b.com. Now requirement is users in a.com can
consume Oauth but not SAML similarly users in b.com can consume SAML but
not Oauth.
WDYT ?
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
SCIM
specific claims functionality from SCIMUserOperationListener and put it
some where else.
Please mention your concerns and suggestions.
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
8/002981.html
> [2] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-3055
>
+1 for [2] since client credentials grant type has nothing to do with
resource owner.
>
> Thanks,
> Asela.
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Asela
>
> ATL
> Mobile : +94 777 625 933
> +35
ds,
> Asela
>
> ATL
> Mobile : +94 777 625 933
> +358 449 228 979
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
--
Gay
ific reason.
>>
>
What would be the particular use case to send access token in query String.
This is a bad practice according to many real world use cases [1].
[1]
http://www.thread-safe.com/2013/10/latest-facebook-security-vulnerability.html
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software
Hi Asela,
Thanks for pointing. I have already updated redmine ticket linked to [1].
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-1891
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Asela Pathberiya wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> > Hi Asela,
> >
> > C
Asela.
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Review notes
> >
> > Participants : Prabath, Chamath, Prasad, Thanuja, Isura, Pulasthi, Gayan
> >
> >
> > 1. Move jax rs custom patch implementation to [1]
-encryption-31
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
> shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't this policy validate go to policy editor? Why do we have it as
>> a separate link?
>>
>> For example, I am editing a policy in policy editor. Should I copy the
>> policy from there, click another link, paste there and
need to
check the validity of a policy without saving the policy.
--
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso
:22 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have completed the feature. Can we have a review tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Gayan
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> According to offline chat we h
Hi All,
I have completed the feature. Can we have a review tomorrow.
Thanks,
Gayan
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> According to offline chat we had, we can ignore Use-Case 03 and Use-Case
> 04.
>
> For Use-Case 01 I have added extra
addresses.
Thanks,
Gayan
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi Ishara,
>
> While looking at patch operation for Users, I have encountered following
> issues.
>
> Use-Case 01 : changing a User's primary email
> Issue : Currently there i
user store in inbound provisioning UI).
>>
> In this case if no user store is selected, users can be provisioned to any
> user store, if its selected users will be provisioned only to that user
> store .
>
> This is how it works.
> @Darshana Please add if something missing.
minor change.
It should be dumb mode not dump mode
Thanks,
Gayan
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi Ishara,
>
> Could you please elaborate more about dump mode in SCIMUserManager and how
> the changes should be reflected to dump mode.
>
> Thanks
Hi Ishara,
Could you please elaborate more about dump mode in SCIMUserManager and how
the changes should be reflected to dump mode.
Thanks,
Gayan
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are around 10 use-cases under [1] here *3.2.2 Modifying with pa
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
