Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Should digital object file_uri field allow non URI data?

2021-04-20 Thread Brian Hoffman
Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 1:26 PM To: "archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org" Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Should digital object file_uri field allow non URI data? Option A, because anything but a URI would create invalid EAD if exported or requested v

[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Should digital object file_uri field allow non URI data?

2021-04-19 Thread Brian Hoffman
Hi, We have been trying to understand what to do about cases like the following: http://sandbox.archivesspace.org/digital_objects/2/edit#tree::digital_object_2 [cid:image001.png@01D73512.22D7F220] As things are now, ArchivesSpace will allow a value like this, but various renderings and

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Should digital object file_uri field allow non URI data?

2021-04-19 Thread Andrew Morrison
Option A, because anything but a URI would create invalid EAD if exported or requested via OAI-PMH. Andrew. On 19/04/2021 17:41, Majewski, Steven Dennis (sdm7g) wrote: I would think ‘A’, but that’s based on that the field is labeled “File URI” so I expect something that looks like a URI,

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Should digital object file_uri field allow non URI data?

2021-04-19 Thread Majewski, Steven Dennis (sdm7g)
I would think ‘A’, but that’s based on that the field is labeled “File URI” so I expect something that looks like a URI, and the fact that some notes in ArchivesSpace are explicitly labeled as allowing mixed content, and that has made me assume that allowing mixed content is not the default.