Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Use of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Accessions" field

2018-02-16 Thread Jordon Steele
...@lyralists.lyrasis.org [mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org] On Behalf Of Rush, Michael Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 9:07 AM To: Archivesspace Users Group Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Use of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Ac

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Use of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Accessions" field

2018-02-16 Thread Rush, Michael
ivesspace Users Group Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Use of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Accessions" field Hi folks, We're discussing the utility of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Accessions" field. By default, ASpace

[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Use of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Accessions" field

2018-02-15 Thread Jordon Steele
Hi folks, We're discussing the utility of the "Relator Type" subfield in the "Related Accessions" field. By default, ASpace requires this subfield, but we are considering suppressing it because we can't think of a reason why we would want to use it. The default value, "bound with," suggests two