Speaking only for myself as one of the often more controversial members of the
AC, I will say that I have been pleasantly surprised
each time I have been re-elected. While I do vote for myself when applicable, I
only have the ability to cast 3 votes as I am the DMR for
three organizations, all
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.comwrote:
IMO the problem (for the AC, not the BoT) is that all turnover comes from
resignations and people deciding not to run again. It's very rare that an
incumbent fails to get re-elected. Given what I've observed as an
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.comwrote:
IMO the problem (for the AC, not the BoT) is that all turnover comes from
resignations and people deciding not to run again. It's very rare that an
incumbent fails to get re-elected. Given what I've observed as an
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Scott Leibrand
scottleibr...@gmail.comwrote:
IMO the problem (for the AC, not the BoT) is that all turnover comes from
resignations and people deciding not to run again. It's very
Hi John
Given the response I think an official proposal needs to be written. I'm happy
to see the acceptance of a written proposal will be received for due process
and not turned over to the recycling bin for not being a policy topic.
I will try to get that turned in this week.
Regards
Marla
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Chris Grundemann
cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Scott Leibrand
scottleibr...@gmail.comwrote:
IMO the problem (for the AC, not the BoT) is that all
Scott said:
IMO the AC tends to be a little bit slow to incorporate new ideas and
approaches. More new faces would help with that. We also tend a little
bit toward becoming a social and travel club. I don't think that is a
serious problem, yet, but I definitely worry about how many of us stay
Hello,
In discussing opposition to 2014-9, and why audited needs-basis is still very
much important,
Owen laid out the following point in support of needs assessments in NRPM 8.2:
1. To raise the visibility when an 8.3 transfer is being attempted through
structures designed
to disguise it
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com
wrote:
| Here are some of the problems I see with the AC. I think term limits
would
| help with all of them, though it wouldn't be a panacea, and it may be
| possible to come up with better solutions to each one of them:
I
Could you explain why you're talking about Bill Darte's seat as if he is
not on the AC serving a term to which he was duly elected? There is no
prohibition about him running for a subsequent term at this point either.
Bill has been an outstanding member of the AC and has done significant work
for
Hi Jason,
Pardon my ignorance please, but what is a 365 degree assessment.? A
quick google turns up 365 degree total marketing and 360 degree
assessments and 360 degree feedback. Is this like the Talking Heads 365
degrees? a typo?
Also, Bill D. has been talked out of not running before. It
It doesn't matter if he says he's not running again. If we generically
want to make a seat appointed then fine but he has every right to change
his mind and run again. Leave AC member's names out of it.
Thanks
Cathy
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Scott Leibrand
The 360 degree review was Martin's suggestion. At the time it sounded like
it mean a review for every angle (360 degrees in a circle).
Bill Darte is an upstanding member of the AC, and I personally wish he
would continue to serve, but it seemed pretty clear that his intent is to
not continue.
/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140326/74038e92/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Springer sprin...@inlandnet.com
To: Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com
Cc: arin-disc...@arin.net arin-disc...@arin.net
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Jason Schiller jschil...@google.comwrote:
The 360 degree review was Martin's suggestion. At the time it sounded
like it mean a review for every angle (360 degrees in a circle).
You mean by adding in the ASO AC to the term limits requirement as well as
the
Hi PPML,
Can someone show me where in the mailing list archives this policy was actively
discussed on PPML? I can't find it.
Alternatively, can the policy author or someone who strongly supports this
policy please either post to the list or email me privately and clue me in? I
issued and
I've seen that a new member has joined the ARIN AC each year.
I have not heard concrete evidence that this proposal improves the policy
making process
I do not think this is a good idea.
Richard Letts
___
PPML
You are receiving this message because
John Curran wrote:
If mandatory terms limits are desired for the ARIN Board of Trustees or ARIN
AC,
it would be best to write up the specific suggestion and submit the ARIN
consultation
and suggestion process, as noted by John Springer. I will bring the proposal
and
results of the discussion
On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:01 PM, David Huberman david.huber...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I apologize if I sound combative, but I strongly dislike this suggestion.
David -
I noted it as an option because it is the mailing list documented for
that purpose in the suggestion process.
John,
19 matches
Mail list logo
