Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9: Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

2014-07-24 Thread John Curran
On Jul 23, 2014, at 10:00 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote: And people wonder why most MA goes unrecorded in whois... Matthew - Is the cause of your concern: 1) ARIN's implementation of current NRPM 8.2 (MA Transfer) policy, which has ARIN work with organizations whose

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments

2014-07-24 Thread Kevin Kargel
I want one! Kevin -Original Message- From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf Of Gary Buhrmaster Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:10 PM To: Mike Burns Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments

2014-07-24 Thread Christoph Blecker
Opposed, based on reasons already provided in this thread. Cheers, Christoph On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:58 AM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote: On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-210 Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments as a Draft Policy. Draft Policy

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments

2014-07-24 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 14-07-24 08:35 AM, Christoph Blecker wrote: Where this is in conflict with any other Section in the Policy Manual, this Section shall be controlling.” Could it be this line that is creating opposition? I am in favor of allowing smaller allocations.. but maybe there are some very specific

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments

2014-07-24 Thread Christoph Blecker
I think the bigger problem is the concept as a whole. To qualify for a /24 (which will be the new minimum for end users and ISPs alike if the ARIN Board adopts 2014-13, which has been recommended to it), you need to justify the use of 204 addresses in the next three months. This is an extremely

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments

2014-07-24 Thread Martin Hannigan
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Christoph Blecker cblec...@gmail.com wrote: I think the bigger problem is the concept as a whole. To qualify for a /24 (which will be the new minimum for end users and ISPs alike if the ARIN Board adopts 2014-13, which has been recommended to it), you need

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9: Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

2014-07-24 Thread John Curran
On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote: ARIN also can't reclaim legacy resources. No op. ARIN does reclaim legacy resources on occasion; this is generally either in compliance with terms of an LRSA for lack of payment or due to the dissolution of an

[arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for p...@arin.net

2014-07-24 Thread Thomas Narten
Total of 44 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 25 00:53:02 EDT 2014 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.82% |3 | 20.29% | 122752 | srye...@eclipse-networks.com 9.09% |4 | 12.97% |78484 |