Total of 53 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Jun 2 00:53:16 EDT 2017
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
22.64% | 12 | 21.71% | 123214 | hostmas...@uneedus.com
22.64% | 12 | 17.86% | 101405 |
As the author of this Draft Policy, I can now see the IPv4 change has
little/no support. I included it originally to give equality to both v4
and v6 with more than 16 ip4 addresses or 16 ip6 networks.
I have asked the AC to remove the IPv4 language from the proposal
(4.2.3.7.1), leaving only
Oppose as written, agree with all of Andy's points.
-Austin
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Hadenfeldt, Andrew C <
andrew.c.hadenfe...@windstream.com> wrote:
> Oppose as written, +1 on the points below (leave /29 alone, and would
> prefer to see /56 rather than /60)
>
>
>
> *-Andy*
>
>
>
>
I was always under the impression that the DMCA requires all notices go to
the address registered for the domain with the Copyright Office under
17 USC 512(c)(2).
I would not think that using a SWIP'ed contact address for DMCA purposes
would be lawful, unless the URL used only an IP address,
Specifically: DMCA violation notices go to the SWIPed contacts instead of the
original holder.
/RjL
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf Of Martin Hannigan
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 7:58 PM
To: Seth Mattinen ; arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Martin Hannigan
wrote:
> Someone want to remind us all of what the "benefits" of SWIP are?
>
Transparency. I refer you to Google Search for the myriad benefits of
transparency.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin
1) According to the policy manual, it appears that SWIP is the tool for an
ISP to document the address assignments made to its customers, so that
when more address space is requested, ARIN can determine qualifications.
2) Although not directly expressed in the policy manual, it is also a tool