If we did this, I suspect what would happen for the foreseeable future is
that all reclaimed space would be assigned out as /24s to everyone willing
to accept a /24 to fulfil their request. Anyone who insisted on a larger
block would get nothing, so there'd be no incentive to do so. That would
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Tom Pruitt wrote:
> If those organizations were watching the list, and moving up, it is likely
> that they have made
>
business decisions based on that data with the assumption that they would
> get an allocation
>
at some point. I believe the proposed
I don't think it should be regardless of the size. That must always be a
limit.
If it's over, it's over and anything little left should favor newcomers
to make sure they can properly exist in the Internet and do business in
Dual-Stack. Leaving to any prefix size just make it more difficult
I agree with these comments. I’m fine requiring all resources obtained via
the wait list to be returned to the wait list rather than be transferred.
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 May 2019, at 11:11, Steven Ryerse via ARIN-PPML
wrote:
Real life may be that larger sizes never come available, but
Real life may be that larger sizes never come available, but if the size does
come available and an org is next on the list and it can be justified within
ARIN’s normal policies, then it should be assigned regardless of size. +1 to
this comment.
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center
My biggest objection is limiting of an organization to a specific size.
Although I realize ARIN can change policies, I believe if an organization has
in good faith followed the existing rules and been put on the waiting list that
they should not come away with nothing especially those that
