Agreed, Brian.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
michael.willi...@glexia.com
I also don't believe this is a good change to be made for the same
reasons outlines by staff, therefore I can't support it as well
Thanks
Fernando
On 30/07/2019 16:49, Brian Jones wrote:
With the clarification that organizations will be removed from the
waiting list if they receive an
ening the potential for abuse by ?double-dipping?
> >> waiting list and transition space requests. As such, this proposal
> >> should be considered in that context.
> >> ___
> >> ARIN-PPML
> >> You are receiving thi
uch, this proposal
> >> should be considered in that context.
> >> ___
> >> ARIN-PPML
> >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
&
With the clarification that organizations will be removed from the waiting list
if they receive an allocation for facilitating their IPv6 deployment, I no
longer support this proposal for the reasons outlined by the ARIN staff below.
My organization will not be impacted by this but I can
All- Staff and legal review has been completed for 2019-9. Please take a
moment to review the comments. For those that supported this, do you still
support the policy given the staff notes. Additionally, we'd like to hear
from anyone that this may impact in a negative way.
Policy:
The point is that you treating IP marketing as something 'natural' or a
'default route' which it is not and can never be. Natural is to receive
some addresses from the RIR in first place so they are treated as anyone
else was in the past and have a chance to exist in the Internet with
same
I would think that the majority of new entrants would need at least some
allocation to help with IPv6 transition and would qualify for addresses from
the 4.10 pool. Depending on what they receive from that pool and when, they
may not qualify for additional waiting list addresses and would have
