[arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for p...@arin.net

2019-10-17 Thread narten
Total of 45 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri 18 Oct 2019 12:53:04 AM EDT Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 20.00% |9 | 15.55% | 116866 | b...@herrin.us 13.33% |6 | 17.84% | 134139 |

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion

2019-10-17 Thread Joe Provo
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:19:27PM -0700, William Herrin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Joe Provo wrote > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:08:36AM -0500, David Farmer wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:00 PM Joe Provo wrote: > > > > "M activity resulting in the surviving legal entity

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion

2019-10-17 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Joe Provo wrote > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:08:36AM -0500, David Farmer wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:00 PM Joe Provo wrote: > > > "M activity resulting in the surviving legal entity which > > > is not incorporated in the ARIN service region will be > > >

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion

2019-10-17 Thread Joe Provo
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:08:36AM -0500, David Farmer wrote: > comments inline; > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:00 PM Joe Provo wrote: > ... > > > Per this and additional private commentary, I'd suggest we > > keep it simple to speak directly to the matters within the > > section where the

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13

2019-10-17 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:32 AM Chris Woodfield wrote: > One could argue that the enforceability of that revocation alone could be > problematic if the non-domestic entity is able to get a local injunction in > their home country against it. It is indeed questionable as to whether or > not

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13

2019-10-17 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:15 AM wrote: > As has been pointed out, if Court is required it takes place in Virginia. > However when it becomes time to actually force compliance with that > Virginia judgment, one has to establish that judgment in the non-Virginia > place which if this passes might

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13

2019-10-17 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hello. Thanks for sending these important explanation and point and congratulations to ARIN legal staff for this. I would comment further saying that this type of assessment raises the importance to some points used in some discussions sometimes like "The internet evolved in X aspect and we

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13

2019-10-17 Thread Chris Woodfield
One could argue that the enforceability of that revocation alone could be problematic if the non-domestic entity is able to get a local injunction in their home country against it. It is indeed questionable as to whether or not *that* injunction would be enforceable in the United States, but

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13

2019-10-17 Thread hostmaster
While someone can hire a professional registered agent in the US, that is not the only problem. This kind of thing happens between states in the US all the time. Most states require anyone doing business in their state to have a place in their state to serve process on someone. Thus, the