Hello ppml community!
I just wanted to recirculate Draft Policy ARIN 2020-10 for feedback. This
draft policy would remove the requirement that ISPs that already hold
reallocations or reassignments from upstream providers satisfy ARIN's
efficient utilization requirements for those
Changing the answer below to /22 instead of /20
1b. If so, what should that upper limit be?
Fernando
On 16/12/2020 02:23, Fernando Frediani wrote:
Answers below:
On 15/12/2020 16:38, Owen DeLong wrote:
Dear ARIN community,
We (the AC, and specifically the proposal shepherds) need to
> On Dec 15, 2020, at 3:49 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>
> Hi Owen,
>
> I thought I had replied to this, but maybe not. Answer below your snippet.
>
>
> "Playing devils advocate for a moment, how would we prevent either of the
> following abuse scenarios:
>
> 1. This allows virtually any ORG to
I'm replying to the last message in this thread.
Please note (and you can refer to the Nov AC minutes) that organizations
that are currently on the waitlist won’t be affected, because the next
disbursement of v4 would fulfill all the exempted orgs as well as the ones
remaining on the list. The
Just some quick thoughts. Nothing I would fall on my sword over.
1a. Do you feel that we should place an upper limit on the size of the
smaller block
received in the process?
Yes, with an appeal process for unique scenarios.
1b. If so, what should that upper limit be?
