Greetings and apologies for the following arguably on-topic/off-topic
post regarding SUCUR-2 aka "Sucuri, Inc.".
I would just like to know if there are any means that ARIN has at it's
disposal to persuade this company to fix the (currently dead) contact
phone numbers that are currently present in
As a new member to ARIN who has been following up with this draft, and
the recent bombardment of emails, I support this request.
I am not part of those removed from 2019-16, but if I was in the place
of those removed from the waitlist, I would certainly be quite bothered.
Getting on the
I support the petition to advance this policy. I think all the
substantive arguments both for and against the policy have been made,
and it's appropriate to close this matter out.
Isaiah Olson
Olson Tech, LLC
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this
I support this petition
Chad Geiser
Integrity Technology Solutions
Chad
Geiser
Director of Strategic Partnerships
O: (309) 662-7723 | D: (309) 664-8146 | M: (309) 824-6463
E: cgei...@integrityts.com | W: integrityts.com
816 S. Eldorado Road, Suite 4
Bloomington, IL 61704
This message contains
On 12/01/2021 16:52, Chris Woodfield wrote:
I’d like to address the following statement in your petition: "when given the
opportunity to explain their rationale behind their vote against, 4 of the 6 AC
council members have not responded.”
The Advisory Council, like all deliberative bodies,
On 12 Jan 2021, at 2:52 PM, Chris Woodfield
mailto:ch...@semihuman.com>> wrote:
...
Mr. Farmer, also a AC alumnus, wisely implores us to disregard any accusations
or implications of nefarious motivations for supporting this policy. That said,
generally speaking, I do not believe that it is out
I oppose this petition and the policy it is attempting to forward.
Tom Pruitt wrote:
Stratus Networks is officially petitioning the Board of Trustees on policy ARIN -2020 -2: Reinstatement of
Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16 against
FD: I am a former ARIN AC Member, and was a member of the AC at the time of the
December meeting. That said, I am speaking as a community member below in a
personal capacity.
I’ll admit that as this proposal wended it way through the PDP, my opinion on
whether or not to support it has changed
Adams TelSystems, Inc. supports this petition.
Jason Baugher
Network Operations Manager
Adams TelSystems, Inc.
For the record, our organization was unaware of the PPML process before this
particular issue arose. We were simply asked to educate ourselves on the issue
at hand and decide if we
After much consideration I am in support of this petition.
Jeff Borelli
President/CEO
[cpcclogo]
Division of R/D Computer Sales & Service, LTD.
and I.V. Net, LLC.
1622 4th St
Peru, IL 61354
Work# 815-223-1052
Fax# 815-223-0791
Mobile# 815-488-9423
Metro Communications (MCC Network Services, LLC) is in favor of this proposal.
We are a vendor, competitor and peer with Stratus and agree completely with
their proposal. I honestly don't see how ARIN members would not be in support
of this change; hopefully the resolution is adopted.
The wait list is a hedge. If you really need IP numbers now, the wait list
is a surefire wire to fail.
Regarding the petition; no comment. One observation. Perhaps the money
spent on legal teams would be better spent on purchasing a block?
Cheers,
-M<
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:21 AM John
I continue to support Reinstatement ie, ARIN-2020-2, and
I support this petition to move the policy consideration to the Board of
Trustees.
Jon Bachtold
CIRBN
ARIN-2020-2: Reinstatement of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by
Implementation of ARIN-2019-16
ARIN-2020-2 reverted to Draft
I am also opposed.
The limited amount of addresses that will come into the wait list at this
point do not make it worth having that waiting list. I would rather
divert all returns into the reserved pools such as 4.10.
I also agree that it appears to have been drafted to benefit limited
14 matches
Mail list logo
