To the beset of my knowledge, membership has never been a criterion for
eligibility to run. It is a requirement to be able to nominate and to vote.
I don’t think this is a change.
What has changed is the behavior of (and possibly the mandate and guidance
given to) the nominating committee.
On Oct 9, 2021, at 11:03 PM, Holden Karau wrote:
Interesting ARIN shows me as the designated voting contact for my org but no
link on the dashboard exists for me to cast support.
Holden -
It is unclear as to why that is the case - please follow up as per the
announcement:
For questions
The instructions are here
https://www.arin.net/participate/oversight/elections/instructions/
Cathy
{Ô,Ô}
(( ))
◊ ◊
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 9:03 PM Holden Karau wrote:
> Interesting ARIN shows me as the designated voting contact for my org but
> no link on the dashboard exists for me
Here's the help guide:
https://www.arin.net/announcements/20211004_petitions/
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 11:03 PM Holden Karau wrote:
> Interesting ARIN shows me as the designated voting contact for my org but
> no link on the dashboard exists for me to cast support.
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 6:30
Interesting ARIN shows me as the designated voting contact for my org but
no link on the dashboard exists for me to cast support.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 6:30 PM Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> The instructions in the "how to" page are TL;DR
>
> Go here:
>
>
A slight correction. I guess I didn't realize that you only need to be
nominated by a member in good standing, not actually a member. Who knew?
With that correction, I would still argue that the regulated should be self
governed, antitrust and all.
Warm regards,
-M<
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 9:26
The instructions in the "how to" page are TL;DR
Go here:
https://account.arin.net/public/secure/dashboard
An alert to cast support came up with a link to do it.
Warm regards,
-M<
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 7:15 PM Holden Karau wrote:
> How do we support the petitions?
>
> On Sat, Oct 9,
It's probably more than process reform that is needed IMHO. I didn't
realize this changed, but you don't need to be a member in good standing to
run for the board. I'm pretty certain it used to be a requirement. Not sure
when that changed. It appears at least two of three possibly aren't. I'd
or we can do everything possible to keep the foxes from robbing the
henhouse. ymmv.
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021, Scott Leibrand wrote:
In light of the public and private responses I’ve gotten to this question,
it seems that the obvious explanations are considered far more credible than
any innocent
In light of the public and private responses I’ve gotten to this question, it
seems that the obvious explanations are considered far more credible than any
innocent ones (of which none have been forthcoming this far).
I would encourage everyone to support these petitions, to solicit candidates’
There were apparently at least 5 candidates. There are 2 open board seats.
The nom-com approved only 3 candidates, hence my complaint.
There are 7 open advisory council seats. I did not count the nomination list
size, but I assure you it was well short of 14.
Owen
> On Oct 9, 2021, at 17:30
How do we support the petitions?
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 3:33 PM Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
> Just adding that it is not the first time this happens.
>
> I am appalled by the NomCom’s behavior!
>
> elvis
>
> Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.
>
> > On Oct 9,
Just adding that it is not the first time this happens.
I am appalled by the NomCom’s behavior!
elvis
Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.
> On Oct 9, 2021, at 14:37, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML
> wrote:
>
> Apologies for posting here, but since arin-discuss
Apologies for posting here, but since arin-discuss is dead and based on John’s
recent expansion of the scope
of PPML, I think it is the most appropriate place to post.
As I understand it, the Nominating Committee has turned down several candidates
for BoT in the upcoming
election, among them
I was rejected for an Advisory Council candidacy even though I was a candidate
in the past and am a policy author in multiple registries.
Another broker was likewise rejected.
There are 7 AC openings, only 10 candidates, but I was rejected.
I know another broker who was, like me, solicited to
Has ARIN disclosed anything about why the NomCom chose to exclude two
obviously-qualified candidates from the ballot when they didn’t yet have 2
candidates per open seat, and the 3 candidates they did include are all less
well-known to the community than both the ones they excluded?
I can
> On Oct 9, 2021, at 4:03 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> There's a petition for two people to be added to the Trustee ballot after
> being rejected by the nom com.
Yes! Go vote on the petitions, so you’ll have more than three choices to fill
the two open board seats, when the election comes.
FYI
There's a petition for two people to be added to the Trustee ballot after
being rejected by the nom com. Petitions have been discussed on PPML in the
past. There also isn't a discussion list any longer. Many voting members
are here. We know Trustee composition impacts policy (recall when the
18 matches
Mail list logo
