Should we abandon this Draft?
After the Chicago Public Policy Meeting, based upon the community's
suggestion that the AC continue to work on this Draft. I sent an email to
PPML asking for support or opposition to this Draft and received just 2
responsesboth in opposition.
I reiterate that
IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS)
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of Bill Darte
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 12:15 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] ARIN Draft Policy 2014-2 Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language
Should we abandon this Draft?
After
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:32 PM, David Huberman
david.huber...@microsoft.com wrote:
At the end of discussion, the moderator asked for the following straw poll
(remote participants were invited to participate). Poll results were provided
to the Advisory Council for use in its deliberations.
On 14-05-05 01:00 PM, Bill Darte wrote:
1. Yes or No. Should the community relax existing policy which attempts
to limit the transfer of ARIN resources out of region, in order to allow
an organization flexibility to move address blocks to another portion of
their own organization in another
Bill Herrin wrote:
What do you suggest as the next step?
[snip]
From my point of view, the original language works as desired.
Are you sure? I typed out an entire simplistic gaming technique so that
speculators and flippers can easily achieve their goals in the existing
language. I
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:12:50PM +, David Huberman wrote:
What do I suggest? I suggest we scrap the section altogether, as it affords
the community no meaningful protection against those who wish to game it, and
it impedes proper administration for global network operators.
FWIW,
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Herrin makes a good point: many of the ideas we've been discussing in
the context of 2014-2 are really a more general relaxation of transfer
policies, and probably should be considered separately. However, I
I support the policy in that it helps companies in the region and I do
not see any harm to any entities in the region. The problem David
Huberman is trying to solve is that there are IP's being used out of
region, and we all know out of region use has lots of geo-location
issues, and for some
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:23 PM, sandrabr...@ipv4marketgroup.com wrote:
[...]
The only thing we don't know is whether this is a one-off problem, or
whether other companies have the same issue. I would think other
companies have the same problem but are not commenting. I suspect the
people
Abandon. As David Huberman pointed out, easy to game and doesn't solve the
real problem with efficient use of resources where we need them, whether
its complying with policies like the German privacy laws or embarking upon
legal and efficient financial strategies that are in compliance with the
At the Advisory Council's meeting of Feb 20, discussion about Draft Policy
2014-2 concluded that there is a real issue with transfer restrictions of
address blocks between RIR jurisdictions for organizations having received
a different block of addresses from ARIN within the last 12 months (per
11 matches
Mail list logo
