Owen,
I think you intended this to be in response to a different email in the
thread, the one related to the Caribbean and rural text in the current
Community Networks policy, and not anything to do with 2009-7: Open Access
To IPv6.
Thanks
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Owen DeLong
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 18:49 , David R Huberman wrote:
>
>
> I wrote:
>
>>> 2) In the first Public Policy Meeting this was presented, the topic of
>>> "cannot meet existing policy" was mostly centered around the criterion that
>>> existed of "must announce a single aggregte"
I wrote:
2) In the first Public Policy Meeting this was presented, the topic of
"cannot meet existing policy" was mostly centered around the criterion that
existed of "must announce a single aggregte" into the DFZ. The presenter
(Joshua King) indicated this was not possible for all community
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:17 PM, David R Huberman wrote:
> ..
>
> 2) In the first Public Policy Meeting this was presented, the topic of
> "cannot meet existing policy" was mostly centered around the criterion that
> existed of "must announce a single aggregte" into the DFZ.
Yes, this removes the Caribbean and rural text that is in the current
Community Networks policy. I believe that was intentional, maybe it should
be noted in the comments to make that clear. Or, do you believe we should
keep that or similar text?
Additional comments on this policy would be
6.5.9.1 says more than was quoted.
The bit that was missing is "For community networks located in rural regions
(population less than 2,500) or in the Caribbean and North Atlantic Islands
Sector, the numbers in these qualification criteria may be relaxed at ARIN's
discretion."
More than half
--
Brian
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Keith W. Hare wrote:
> David,
>
>
>
> 6.5.2.2 item C requests a plan “with a minimum of 50 assignments within 5
> years”
>
>
>
> 6.5.9.1 says “a community network must demonstrate it will immediately
> provide sustained service to at least
I dug through the archives and wow, this policy (2008-3) had a long
history. It took 21 months from start to finish, was revised 4 times,
and was discussed in 23 separate ARIN AC meetings.
tldr: existing v6 policy in 2008-2009 could not be met by operators of
community networks, due to both
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 18:34 , Keith W. Hare wrote:
>
> David,
>
> 6.5.2.2 item C requests a plan “with a minimum of 50 assignments within 5
> years”
> <>
> 6.5.9.1 says “a community network must demonstrate it will immediately
> provide sustained service to at least 100
Hi Keith,
Thanks for the reply.
My understanding from the community network presentations given to the
ARIN community was that the 50 assignments / 100 assignments thresholds
were too high a bar to clear. I believe they said that commonly,
community networks are often considerably smaller,
David,
6.5.2.2 item C requests a plan “with a minimum of 50 assignments within 5 years”
6.5.9.1 says “a community network must demonstrate it will immediately provide
sustained service to at least 100 simultaneous users and must demonstrate a
plan to provide sustained service to at least 200
11 matches
Mail list logo