Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:22 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > Maybe there's a third way we're not seeing, like retiring e, adding > the new element as f, and then re-inserting the catchall some other > way, point g or as a sentence that follows the ordered list. Oooh, I like

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

I am in favor of this proposal. Relaxing the requirements could foster further IPv6 adoption. Brian Jones bjo...@vt.edu ___ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

I support the policy as written. > -Original Message- > From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On > Behalf Of ARIN > Sent: September 1, 2015 1:21 PM > To: arin-ppml@arin.net > Subject: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-20

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com wrote: As shepherd, I would be inclined to revise the policy statement so that it inserts e) and renumbers the current e) to f), rather than replacing the entire section as currently worded. Basically that would just mean

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: Are we really going to spend this much time rethinking bullet points? What better opportunity will you have to learn how to write a policy draft _well_ than with one which is inoffensive? The knowledge and skill gained can serve

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

Are we really going to spend this much time rethinking bullet points? Move e to f, insert new e, move on. This is not a complicated proposal. It makes sense. I agree it is clearer as a diff with an attached redline than as a full replacement text. Beyond that, let’s leave it alone and move it

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

PM To: arin-ppml@arin.net Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments I still do not think the problem statement is a real issue. If you have Multiple Discrete Networks (using the IPv4 terminology) then that would

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

] On Behalf Of ARIN Sent: 23 June 2015 1:07 PM To: arin-ppml@arin.net Subject: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:07 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote: Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments On second thought, I withdraw my support and oppose the policy draft as written. While I approve of the policy in concept, the draft

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Gary T. Giesen ggie...@giesen.me wrote: While I appreciate your support of this policy, I'm a little confused about your statement as this policy doesn't even deal with allocations of a single /48. In fact, the current smallest prefix this policy deals with

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

that number was deliberately chosen because of that). Cheers, GTG Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us Date: 2015-06-24 17:16 (GMT-05:00) To: Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On 6/25/2015 6:14 AM, William Herrin wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:07 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote: Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments On second thought, I withdraw my support and oppose the policy draft as written. While I

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Andrew Dul andrew@quark.net wrote: Just so I understand you are opposed to the 'editorial' way the policy was written, not the content of the actual changes? Well, that's kinda the crux of it. I don't think I'm opposed to the changes but to be sure I'd have

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:07 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote: Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments Organizations may justify an initial assignment for addressing devices directly attached to their own network infrastructure, with an

[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments On 18 June 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) recommended ARIN-2015-1 for adoption, making it a Recommended Draft Policy. ARIN-2015-1 is below and can be found at:

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On 6/23/2015 1:07 PM, ARIN wrote: Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments I am of mixed opinion on this policy. I agree that it should be quite easy for an organization to receive their own IPv6 space. And I was fully supportive

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

I'll point out that at my current employer, I cannot justify obtaining PI v6 space. So I've deployed ULA + NPT in order to guarantee uniqueness. I see IPv6 allocation making some of the same assumptions humans have made through time (e.g. 640k should be enough for anyone ), so I'm not sure I

Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments On 6/23/2015 1:07 PM, ARIN wrote: Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments I am of mixed opinion on this policy