I do not support the re-adding of organizations with any size of IPv4
holdings back to the wait-list.
Speaking only for myself,
Andrew
On 8/18/2020 8:39 AM, Hayee Bokhari wrote:
Seems like a plan,
Go for it.
Regards
Hayee Bokhari
514-341-1579 Ex 212
800-427-6012 Ex 212
bokh...@cronomagi
Seems like a plan,
Go for it.
Regards
Hayee Bokhari
514-341-1579 Ex 212
800-427-6012 Ex 212
bokh...@cronomagic.com
http://www.cronomagic.com
Hi all,
Alyssa and I (co-shepherds for this policy) have reviewed all of the comments.
There are 18 comments in favour of the spirit of this policy, and 5
Organizations in the waiting list went to ARIN's vetting process before they
got into waiting list, so justification already exist,
Regards
Hayee Bokhari
514-341-1579 Ex 212
800-427-6012 Ex 212
bokh...@cronomagic.com
http://www.cronomagic.com
>What is the justification to give organization who a
Speaking in a personal capacity: I do not support this policy proposal.
I’d been struggling to express my reasoning in a succinct manner, but Hayee’s
comment helped - organizations who had made business plans that were dependent
on obtaining IPv4 space through the waiting list process only have
I fully support this policy,
lot of parties suffered from this, months of planning went in the drain.
Regards
Hayee Bokhari
514-341-1579 Ex 212
800-427-6012 Ex 212
bokh...@cronomagic.com
http://www.cronomagic.com
>On 19 March 2020, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
>"ARIN-prop-282: Grand
