In message <023101d41d0a$3374d440$9a5e7cc0$@iptrading.com>,
"Mike Burns" wrote:
>Whereas I am sure you will get firm agreement from everybody in this
>community regarding the abuse of address space, your language leads to
>conflating the concept of ARIN-"awarded" space and purchased space
The following has been revised:
* Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments
Revised text is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2018_4.html
You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will
evaluate the discussion in order
Ron wrote:
But I certainly do not ask or expect ARIN to take on the "Internet Police"
role with respect to those separate issues. I can and do however bemoan the
fact that the two blocks in question were issued AT ALL... apparently to two
fundamentally out-of-region players.
I bemoan these
> On Jul 16, 2018, at 5:36 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>
> Bottom line? If goofballs from outside of ARIN's North American and
> Caribbean geographical region feel the need to get chunks of IPv4 space
> and then preceed to use those to screw up the Internet, then I for one
> would
In message <7fa40add-2dc1-4e04-bb68-2e7e5920c...@arin.net>,
John Curran wrote:
>ARIN has significantly tightened our review of requester's location
>(particularly with regard to potential OFAC concerns) over the last two
>years, as it came to our attention that parties were getting more
