If we did this, I suspect what would happen for the foreseeable future is
that all reclaimed space would be assigned out as /24s to everyone willing
to accept a /24 to fulfil their request. Anyone who insisted on a larger
block would get nothing, so there'd be no incentive to do so. That would
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Tom Pruitt wrote:
> If those organizations were watching the list, and moving up, it is likely
> that they have made
>
business decisions based on that data with the assumption that they would
> get an allocation
>
at some point. I believe the proposed
: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation
Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests
My biggest objection is limiting of an organization to a specific
size. Although I realize ARIN can change policies, I believe if an
organization has in good faith followed the existing rules and been
put
,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
*From:* ARIN-PPML *On Behalf Of *Andrew Dul
*Sent:* Monday, May 6, 2019 4:09 PM
*To:* arin-ppml@arin.net
*Subject:* [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM
4.1.8. Unmet Requests
Hello,
I'd like to bring your attention
To: David Farmer
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM
4.1.8. Unmet Requests
My biggest objection is limiting of an organization to a specific size.
Although I realize ARIN can change policies, I believe if an organization has
in good
are available then they should get the allocation.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
From: David Farmer
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 3:44 PM
To: Tom Pruitt
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding
*Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding
NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests
If /20 is too small is their another size you would propose? a /19 or a /18
maybe? Do you have an argument for why that is the right number?
When the AC looked at this there was strong support
gt;
Subject: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8.
Unmet Requests
Hello,
I'd like to bring your attention to another issue that may have been lost in
the flurry of other emails. We are currently in a 14 day feedback period for
the AC's response to the
eatly, and they
> need some clarity.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom Pruitt
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Stratus Networks
>
>
>
> [image: stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
>
>
>
> *From:* ARIN-PPML *On Behalf Of *Andrew Dul
> *Sent:*
...@arin.net>>
On Behalf Of Andrew Dul
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:09 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>
Subject: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8.
Unmet Requests
Hello,
I'd like to bring your attention to another issue that may ha
: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8.
Unmet Requests
Hello,
I'd like to bring your attention to another issue that may have been lost in
the flurry of other emails. We are currently in a 14 day feedback period for
the AC's response to the Board's suspension
Hello,
I'd like to bring your attention to another issue that may have been
lost in the flurry of other emails. We are currently in a 14 day
feedback period for the AC's response to the Board's suspension of the
wait-list. Please note the following updated text for the wait-list.
Your
12 matches
Mail list logo
