Thank you for the clarification Joe. I have no further discussion of this
draft at this time.
—
Brian Jones
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:15 AM Joe Provo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 01:43:25PM -0500, Brian Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:34 AM Andrew Dul
> wrote:
> >
> > >
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 01:43:25PM -0500, Brian Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:34 AM Andrew Dul wrote:
>
> > I would say as a continuing ARIN member they are responsible for keeping
> > up their POC and abuse records just like any other member.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
>
> Point being,
I'll let the proposal speak for itself. Not in favor.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:23 AM ARIN wrote:
> The following has been revised:
>
> * Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion
>
> Revised text is below and can be found at:
>
>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:34 AM Andrew Dul wrote:
> I would say as a continuing ARIN member they are responsible for keeping
> up their POC and abuse records just like any other member.
>
> Andrew
>
Point being, if those address blocks are ignored long enough, they could be
reclaimed
I would say as a continuing ARIN member they are responsible for keeping
up their POC and abuse records just like any other member.
Andrew
On 1/28/2020 11:52 AM, Brian Jones wrote:
>
> Question: Does this mean that the entity responsible for the continued
> resource holdings is subject to
Question: Does this mean that the entity responsible for the continued
resource holdings is subject to keeping up the POC and abuse contact
information for each of the locations or allocation blocks where it
continues to use ARIN resources?
—
Brian Jones
NI Virginia Tech
bjo...@vt.edu
On Tue,
The following has been revised:
* Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion
Revised text is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_12/
You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will
evaluate the discussion in
