This is probably not the right place to ask, but I'm unsure where to best ask.
And at least it's somewhat relevant given recent talk of large actors in the
CNNIC area gaming ARIN...
1) when someone submits a fraud report to ARIN, how are they supposed to
communicate additional information on
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7
Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
On 18 June 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-221
Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers as a
Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7 is below and can be
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1
Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments
On 18 June 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) recommended
ARIN-2015-1 for adoption, making it a Recommended Draft Policy.
ARIN-2015-1 is below and can be found at:
In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP), the ARIN
Advisory Council (AC) met on 18 June 2015.
Having found the following Draft Policy to be fully developed and
meeting ARIN's Principles of Internet Number Resource Policy, the AC
recommended it for adoption; it will be posted
Hello Adam,
Thank you for submitting these questions about fraud reporting.
We have found the fraud reporting system to be very helpful over the past few
years. We receive many different types of fraud reports through this system.
Some of them have helped ARIN begin investigations that have
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-5
Out of region use
On 18 June 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-219
Out of region use as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-5 is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2015_5.html
You are encouraged to discuss the
+1 Owen's remarks.
There’s another possibility which seems entirely likely to me.
Of 146 fraud reports, 2% cover legitimate fraud. Most fraud likely goes
unreported.
As noted by ARIN staff earlier in this conversation, the vast majority of
fraud reports they receive are out of scope…
General
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Richard Jimmerson richa...@arin.net
wrote:
Hello Adam,
Thank you for submitting these questions about fraud reporting.
We have found the fraud reporting system to be very helpful over the
past few years. We receive many different types of fraud reports
On 6/23/2015 1:07 PM, ARIN wrote:
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1
Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments
I am of mixed opinion on this policy. I agree that it should be quite
easy for an organization to receive their own IPv6 space. And I was
fully supportive
On Jun 23, 2015, at 19:34 , Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Richard Jimmerson richa...@arin.net
mailto:richa...@arin.net wrote:
Hello Adam,
Thank you for submitting these questions about fraud reporting.
We have found the fraud
On 6/23/2015 4:16 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and
I think I'd be ok with that... do we need language in one or the other
that explains what happens if both pass?
Matthew Kaufman
matt...@matthew.at
On 6/23/2015 5:21 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I agree with your reasoning, but as a conclusion, I support the broader-based
2015-5 as I believe it
I believe the text is compatible as-is. If section 4 says out of region
use is allowed, and then section 8 (where this one would go) also says
geographic location doesn't matter, then ARIN will follow whichever of
those they get to first, and we might just have slightly more lenient rules
for
I'll point out that at my current employer, I cannot justify obtaining PI v6
space. So I've deployed ULA + NPT in order to guarantee uniqueness.
I see IPv6 allocation making some of the same assumptions humans have made
through time (e.g. 640k should be enough for anyone ), so I'm not sure I
I presume that was in jest, but just like to confirm if you have a
legitimate beef with this draft policy.
Cheers,
GTG
-Original Message-
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman
Sent: June-23-15 8:25 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Opposed.
On 15-06-23 05:39 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I am opposed to this proposal.
It is yet another attempt to chip away at needs basis by those seeking
to provide for unlimited and unrestricted transfers.
The community has repeatedly indicated that the preservation of needs
basis is important
On 15-06-23 02:11 PM, Richard Jimmerson wrote:
If you have submitted a report in the last fourteen days, you should
hear back from us shortly. You are also welcome to contact us via our
telephone help-desk for status information.
3) why can't I submit a fraud report if I'm logged in to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and Multi-national Networks
OPPOSED.
Noted. Can you read over my comments below, and then note why you think
it's a bad
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-5
Out of region use
OPPOSED.
This draft calls for ARIN staff to make highly subjective value
judgments which will, by their nature, vary from individual to
individual and probably even from an individual's mood
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
IPv4 transfer recipients must demonstrate (and an officer of the
requesting
organization must attest) that they will use at least 50% of their
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:16 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft
On 6/23/2015 1:06 PM, ARIN wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7
Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
I support this policy, but would be even happier if we simply had a
trigger that said when ARIN is out of IPv4 addresses, this simplified
policy replaces all other
I agree with your reasoning, but as a conclusion, I support the broader-based
2015-5 as I believe it provides a more flexible solution to a wider swath of
the ARIN community.
Owen
On Jun 23, 2015, at 17:19 , Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
On 6/23/2015 1:06 PM, ARIN wrote:
Draft
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7
Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7
Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
Date: 23 June 2015
Problem statement:
ARIN
On 6/23/2015 3:36 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and Multi-national Networks
OPPOSED.
Policy violates PDP section 3.2. The policy requires ARIN to consider
addresses used outside the region but the PDP
On 6/23/2015 3:55 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us
mailto:b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net
mailto:i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and Multi-national
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and Multi-national Networks
OPPOSED.
Policy violates PDP section 3.2. The policy requires ARIN to consider
addresses used outside the region but the PDP restricts policy scope
to number resources
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and Multi-national Networks
OPPOSED.
Noted.
On Jun 23, 2015, at 14:11 , Richard Jimmerson richa...@arin.net wrote:
Hello Adam,
Thank you for submitting these questions about fraud reporting.
We have found the fraud reporting system to be very helpful over the past few
years. We receive many different types of fraud reports
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:22 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Scott Leibrand scottleibr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
IPv4 transfer recipients must demonstrate (and an officer of the
On 6/23/2015 1:06 PM, ARIN wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
Transfers and Multi-national Networks
I support this policy. For whatever reason, an entity may choose to be
utilizing its address space anywhere in the world. Where the addresses
are being used at this instant should not have any
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
On 6/23/2015 1:06 PM, ARIN wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7
Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
I support this policy, but would be even happier if we simply had a
trigger that said when
32 matches
Mail list logo
