n.net"
Subject: Re: [arin-tech-discuss] ARIN IRR data verification
Just as an update, both RIPE and RADB also had objects for this route. They've
both removed them now.
That just leaves ARIN deciding to preserve this.
On 5/17/2018 2:21 PM, Tony Tauber wrote:
They're using it to docu
Just as an update, both RIPE and RADB also had objects for this route.
They've both removed them now.
That just leaves ARIN deciding to preserve this.
On 5/17/2018 2:21 PM, Tony Tauber wrote:
They're using it to document that anyone can add anything to that
IRR. :-P
On Thu, May 17, 2018 a
They're using it to document that anyone can add anything to that IRR. :-P
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Brian Rak wrote:
> Well, this is RFC3849 space so it's pretty clear that it shouldn't be in
> use. This is the simplest possible case here, it's not even that they're
> trying to use so
Well, this is RFC3849 space so it's pretty clear that it shouldn't be in
use. This is the simplest possible case here, it's not even that
they're trying to use someone else's space.
On 5/17/2018 10:36 AM, Andy Newton wrote:
Brian,
At present ARIN does not validate entries in the ARIN IRR. T
Brian,
At present ARIN does not validate entries in the ARIN IRR. This has been a
topic of much discussion over the past several years, and we just completed a
second community consultation on the topic. The implementation plan for our new
IRR will be available soon (I will send the link here
