On 10/11/2012 08:03 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:10 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Just out of interest, which packages are you referring to? I am assuming
it is LibreOffice + a small subset of whatever is in Fedora that isn't
in EL; mainly because I had no RAM/swap/CPU issues building
On 10/11/2012 08:03 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:10 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Just out of interest, which packages are you referring to? I am assuming
it is LibreOffice + a small subset of whatever is in Fedora that isn't
in EL; mainly because I had no RAM/swap/CPU issues building
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 09:40 +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
I use iSCSI (ext4 build area on one of the hosts for the packages that
fail self-tests on NFS) and NFS (for everything else) backed by a
reasonably beefy storage box.
Why no just iSCSI ? I am guessing you have some numbers to
On 10/12/2012 09:55 AM, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 09:40 +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
I use iSCSI (ext4 build area on one of the hosts for the packages that
fail self-tests on NFS) and NFS (for everything else) backed by a
reasonably beefy storage box.
Why no just iSCSI ? I
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:46:37PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Marvell? Asking who in particular? And what configuration. There's a
lot of kirkwood chips with 128Mb or less RAM which makes it a little
pointless for a Fedora image and hence IMO not relevant.
A Seagate dockstar has only 128Mb
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:37:51PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com writes:
Personally I'd be fine if we consider Kirkwood to be server only
(i.e. headless). So to me that implies that a lack of Libreoffice is
okay. Granted, I don't know if that's okay from a
On Friday, October 12, 2012, 1:51:43 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:37:51PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com writes:
Personally I'd be fine if we consider Kirkwood to be server only
(i.e. headless). So to me that implies that a lack of Libreoffice is
On 10/10/2012 06:47 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
Might as well wait until the whole 32-bit branch can be dropped. Practically
all x86 CPU made in most of the past decade is x86-64.
Half decade maybe as Intel first introduced 64 bit CPUs in early 2005
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 10/10/2012 05:55 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in
the
official rPi builds
On 10/11/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Gordan Bobicgor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 10/10/2012 05:55 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 10/11/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Gordan Bobicgor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 10/10/2012 05:55 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood,
On 10/10/2012 09:46 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I know that RPi looks interesting, but they are still very hard to
acquire. (Limit 1, then wait a few months??)
That's no longer the case. In most cases I believe it should now be
relatively instant shipping and they're certainly no longer
On 10/10/2012 07:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 10/10/2012 10:47 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Sure, but we're a decade later. Kirkwood devices were just released
what? 3 years ago? I certainly got mine more recently than that. I
admit I've been running F12 on it, but that's only because there
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:30:24AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Tue, 9 Oct 2012 08:54:26 +0100
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name
wrote:
It seems that the disk image boots on the dockstar, but a first yum
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Jon,
Jon Masters j...@redhat.com writes:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
Might as well wait until the whole 32-bit branch can be dropped. Practically
all x86 CPU made in most of the past decade is x86-64.
Half decade maybe as Intel first introduced 64 bit CPUs in early 2005
and it took a while to spread through their
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Jon,
Jon Masters j...@redhat.com writes:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0400, Scott Sullivan wrote:
On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 9 Oct 2012 08:54:26 +0100
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0400, Scott Sullivan wrote:
On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till
Jon,
Jon Masters j...@redhat.com writes:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know
whether we should put
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Jon,
Jon Masters j...@redhat.com writes:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 10/09/2012 03:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
The x86 port still supports a Pentium, I don't see any reason to drop
support for kirkwood. Is it really that much extra effort?
It is surprisingly quite a lot of effort.
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know
whether we
On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but that doesn't mean
On 10/08/2012 02:53 PM, Scott Sullivan wrote:
On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote:
[...]
It also includes instructions to update the boot loader and supports
installing on USB, SD card and eSATA. The Fedora instructions only
mention to dd an image on a SD card on the other hand.
You'll
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0400, Scott Sullivan wrote:
On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5
Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away.
Just to get a rough gauge of interest, perhaps we should look at the
download stats for the F17 images. That won't tell us the
number of actual 'users', but will at least give
On 10/06/2012 11:07 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Gordan,
On 10/06/2012 05:58 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in
That /may/ be true. Maybe. I don't know that for sure. They certainly
were popular amongst a certain crowd. I would say the most popular board
these days is likely the rPi, followed by some of the new v7 devices,
especially the cheaper rPi-inspired AllWinner based stuff, which we
probably
On 10/06/2012 09:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but that
On 06/10/2012 15:02, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Gordan Bobicgor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because
On 10/06/2012 06:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Of course none of this is set in stone, it's a discussion and just me
putting my ideas into words.
FWIW, I likewise think we should shoot for promotion of armv7hl to
primary, leaving armv5 (or armv6) secondary. Numerous packages with
atomics
32 matches
Mail list logo
