On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:59 AM Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 22.08.19 11:31, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:58:32 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> >> And in 1.5 hours today it happened even with
> >> kernel-5.1.12-300.nocpufreq.fc30.aarch64. So it only matters how
Hi Jan,
On 22.08.19 11:31, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:58:32 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> And in 1.5 hours today it happened even with
>> kernel-5.1.12-300.nocpufreq.fc30.aarch64. So it only matters how often
> As a summary I have returned to Raspberry to check it more after
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:58:32 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> And in 1.5 hours today it happened even with
> kernel-5.1.12-300.nocpufreq.fc30.aarch64. So it only matters how often
As a summary I have returned to Raspberry to check it more after some time and
it all works perfectly now with updated
Hi Jan,
Am 26.06.19 um 16:58 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:05:09 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> BTW after ~6 hours of uptime kernel-5.2.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc31.aarch64 died
>> again with:
>> [22937.548815] sdhost-bcm2835 3f202000.mmc: timeout waiting for
>> hardware
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:05:09 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> BTW after ~6 hours of uptime kernel-5.2.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc31.aarch64 died
> again with:
> [22937.548815] sdhost-bcm2835 3f202000.mmc: timeout waiting for
> hardware interrupt.
>
> It was probably heavily swapping to the MicroSD
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:22:33 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:12:40 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > There's a different driver in the 5.2 rc series from
> > 5.2.0-0.rc4.git2.1 and later builds, you might want to try rc5
> >
> >
> Am 24.06.2019 um 08:47 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:11:55 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >> Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> >>> So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
> >> Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this
Hi Jan,
Am 24.06.2019 um 08:47 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:11:55 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this experimental
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:12:40 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There's a different driver in the 5.2 rc series from
> 5.2.0-0.rc4.git2.1 and later builds, you might want to try rc5
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1288824
Yes, that works. Could you backport that to the
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 7:47 AM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:11:55 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > > So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
> >
> > Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:11:55 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
>
> Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this experimental cpufreq patch,
> which is very dangerous.
>
>
Am 23.06.19 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Robinson:
>> Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
mmc/sdhci modules.
>>> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64
> Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
> >> mmc/sdhci modules.
> > kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> > kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64
Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
>> mmc/sdhci modules.
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
>
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:53:07 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Have you tested 5.1.x like .12 or the latest 5.2rc5 releases?
In my OP I have tested (as failing):
kernel-5.2.0-0.rc3.git3.1.fc31.aarch64
I have also tested (as failing): kernel-5.1.11-300.fc30.aarch64
(not yet tested 5.1.12)
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
> > mmc/sdhci modules.
>
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
>
Hi Jan,
Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
>> mmc/sdhci modules.
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
> mmc/sdhci modules.
kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:36:57 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >> It would be helpful to send me this card and i'll try to fix this.
> > I have tracked it down so far to a regression between:
> > kernel-5.0.0-300.fc30.aarch64
> > kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64
> >
> > And
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:00:20 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 23.06.19 um 10:43 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > kernel-5.0.0-300.fc30.aarch64
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1219993
wget -O -
Hi,
Am 23.06.19 um 10:43 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:36:57 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> It would be helpful to send me this card and i'll try to fix this.
> I have tracked it down so far to a regression between:
> kernel-5.0.0-300.fc30.aarch64
>
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:36:57 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> It would be helpful to send me this card and i'll try to fix this.
I have tracked it down so far to a regression between:
kernel-5.0.0-300.fc30.aarch64
kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64
And
Hi Jan,
Am 22.06.19 um 20:40 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:59:29 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> it does matter, because there is zero free documentation about the
>> sdhost controller on the BCM2835.
> "Kingston C16G JAPAN, SDC2", bought in 2009.
>
>
>> Raspbian uses their
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:59:29 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> it does matter, because there is zero free documentation about the
> sdhost controller on the BCM2835.
"Kingston C16G JAPAN, SDC2", bought in 2009.
> Raspbian uses their downstream sdhost driver
> bcm2835-sdhost, while Fedora the
Hi Jan,
Am 22.06.19 um 09:04 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> Hello,
>
> further discussion with Peter Robinson was at:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607872#c11
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:55:39 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> I've seen a lot of reports about this issue.
Hello,
further discussion with Peter Robinson was at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607872#c11
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:55:39 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> I've seen a lot of reports about this issue. Unfortunately this was only
> reproducible with specific MicroSD cards.
>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just copying from:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607872#c8
>
> On Raspberry Pi 3B+ when I boot from MicroSD from USB adapter all works fine.
> When I use the same MicroSD into the MicroSD slot of Raspberry it
Hi Jan,
On 21.06.19 12:59, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just copying from:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607872#c8
this issue isn't related to your problem. This problem occurs only on a
specific command.
>
> On Raspberry Pi 3B+ when I boot from MicroSD from USB adapter all
28 matches
Mail list logo
