On 1/4/20, zap wrote:
> Hmm, okay sounds good, thanks for clearing up that mystery. Still I do
> love that risc-v is supposedly ultra lightweight. Too bad about their
> dracoian methods... ;/
not draconian: just blatantly arrogant.
> They really are like the mozilla of processors.
indeed.
>>
>> I will wait to see your
>> plans and whether you plan to make your own risc-v or openpower
>> processor then.
> both.
>
> absolute to-the-letter RV64GC compliance in *userspace*... *ONLY*.
> with full POWER compliance in ***BOTH*** userspace AND kernelspace.
Hmm, okay sounds good,
On 1/4/20, zap wrote:
> hmm... okay. I must've gotten confused then.
yes :) it's what's *not* done that matters, not what *is* done.
> I will wait to see your
> plans and whether you plan to make your own risc-v or openpower
> processor then.
both.
absolute to-the-letter RV64GC compliance
>>> like any trademark, if you make no mention of the trademark, or any
>>> claims of "compliance", you're probably ok.
>>>
>>> from the time i worked on samba-tng, you can claim *compatibility*
>>> with something that is a pun or the *inversion* of a trademark.
>>> "arcfour-compatible" rather
On 1/4/20, zap wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/2020 07:25 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On 1/3/20, zap wrote:
>>> Just to be clear, you cannot legally sell risc-v processors even if you
>>> remove the trademarks.
>> like any trademark, if you make no mention of the trademark, or any
>> claims
On 01/03/2020 07:25 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On 1/3/20, zap wrote:
>> Just to be clear, you cannot legally sell risc-v processors even if you
>> remove the trademarks.
> like any trademark, if you make no mention of the trademark, or any
> claims of "compliance", you're
On 1/3/20, zap wrote:
> Just to be clear, you cannot legally sell risc-v processors even if you
> remove the trademarks.
like any trademark, if you make no mention of the trademark, or any
claims of "compliance", you're probably ok.
from the time i worked on samba-tng, you can claim
Just to be clear, you cannot legally sell risc-v processors even if you
remove the trademarks.
And, OpenPower can be made more secure and lightweight then Risc-V.
Do I have that right?
If so, then I will recommend the Hyperbola devs work within the
OpenPower thought process for making libre,
On 2020-01-02 00:28, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
after they got the ARM7 functional, barry managed to get ARM their
very first license, ever: with Plessey. they were so happy, they
offered him a job. barry turned it down: he would have been employee
number 12, and a very rich man, now
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 00:13:16 +0800
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Thursday, January 2, 2020, Hendrik Boom
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:28:03AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > IBM takes its responsibility as a world-leader extremely seriously,
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
